A 65-year-old

A 53-year-old man developed bilateral pleural effusion with respiratory failure. The amylase level in the pleural effusion was elevated. He had neither abdominal symptoms nor abdominal physical findings. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) also showed no abnormalities. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) was non-diagnostic, but endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and subsequent CT showed a fistula connecting the pancreatic duct with the right pleural cavity. The pleural effusion was refractory to drug therapy, leading to the need for surgical intervention. The pathological findings revealed chronic pancreatitis without pseudocysts. The elevated pancreatic amylase in the pleural effusion offered an important clue to the correct diagnosis.

A 63-year-old female presented with abnormal lung shadows but had, apart from this, few symptoms. Computed tomography (CT) revealed multiple nodules and blockage of the pulmonary artery. She was immediately diagnosed with pulmonary artery sarcoma based on a careful differential diagnosis and underwent surgery. Her tumor was pathologically diagnosed as leiomyosarcoma (i.e. intimal sarcoma). Pulmonary artery sarcoma can be easily confounded with thromboembolism in a clinical setting and some cases are diagnosed post mortem only. In our case, clinical prediction scores (Wells score, Geneva score, and revised Geneva score) for the pulmonary embolism showed low probability. Moreover, chest CT showed uncommon findings for pulmonary thromboembolism, as the nodules were too big for thrombi. Because surgical resection can provide the only hope of long-term survival in cases of pulmonary artery sarcoma, clinicians should consider this possibility in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Clinical prediction scores and CT findings might help to reach the correct diagnosis of pulmonary artery sarcoma.

No abstract

No abstract