Background: COVID-19 can be accompanied by acute neurological complications of both central and peripheral nervous systems (CNS and PNS). In this study, we estimate the frequency of such complications among hospital inpatients with COVID-19 in Assiut and Aswan university hospitals. Materials and Methods: We screened all patients with suspected COVID-19 admitted from 1 June to 10 August 2020 to the university hospitals of Assiut and Aswan in Upper Egypt. Clinical and laboratory tests, CT/MRI of the chest and brain, and neurophysiology study were performed for each patient if indicated. Results: 439 patients had confirmed/probable COVID-19; neurological manifestations occurred in 222. Of these, 117 had acute neurological disease and the remainder had nonspecific neuropsychiatric symptoms such as headache, vertigo, and depression. The CNS was affected in 75 patients: 55 had stroke and the others had convulsions (5), encephalitis (6), hypoxic encephalopathy (4), cord myelopathy (2), relapse of multiple sclerosis (2), and meningoencephalitis (1). The PNS was affected in 42 patients: the majority had anosmia and ageusia (31) and the others had Guillain-Barré syndrome (4), peripheral neuropathy (3), myasthenia gravis (MG, 2), or myositis (2). Fever, respiratory symptoms, and headache were the most common general symptoms. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and ischemic heart disease were the most common comorbidities in patients with CNS affection. Conclusion: In COVID-19, both the CNS and PNS are affected. Stroke was the most common complication for CNS, and anosmia and/or ageusia were common for PNS diseases. However, there were 6 cases of encephalitis, 2 cases of spinal cord myelopathy, 2 cases of MG, and 2 cases of myositis.

Background: COVID 19 can be accompanied by acute neurological complications of both central and peripheral nervous systems (CNS and PNS). In this study we estimate the frequency of such complications among hospital in-patients with COVID-19 in Assiut and Aswan University Hospitals. Material and Methods: We screened all patients with suspected COVID-19 admitted from 1 June to 10 August 2020 to the university hospitals of Assiut and Aswan in Upper Egypt. Clinical and laboratory data, CT/MRI of chest and brain, and neurophysiology were performed for each patient if indicated. Results: 439 patients had confirmed/probable COVID-19; neurological manifestations occurred in 222. Of these 117 had acute neurological disease; the remainder had non-specific neuropsychiatric symptoms such as headache, vertigo, and depression. The CNS was affected in 75 patients: 55 had stroke; the others had convulsions (5), encephalitis (6), hypoxic encephalopathy (4), cord myelopathy (2), relapse of RR-MS (2), and meningoencephalitis (1). The PNS was affected in 42 patients: the majority had anosmia and ageusia (31); the others had GBS (4), peripheral neuropathy (3), myasthenia gravis (2), or myositis (2). Fever, respiratory symptoms and headache, were the most common general symptoms. Hypertensions, Diabetes Mellitus, ischemic heart disease were the most common comorbidities in patients with CNS affection. Conclusion: In COVID‑19, both the CNS and PNS are affected. Stroke was the most common complication for CNS and anosmia and/or ageusia were common for PNS diseases. However there were 6 cases encephalitis, 2 cases of spinal cord myelopathy, 2 cases of MG and 2 cases of myositis.

No abstract

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that both high and low frequency rTMS may have therapeutic effects on motor performance of Parkinson's disease. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to conduct the first direct comparison of the two approaches. METHODS: 52 PD patients were randomly classified into two groups. The first group received 20Hz and the 2 nd group received 1Hz rTMS with a total of 2000 pulses over M1of each hemisphere for ten days. Effects were assessed with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS), Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL), and a self-assessment score (SA) before, after the last session, and one month later. Cortical excitability was measured before and after the end of sessions. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement on all rating scales after either 1 Hz or 20 Hz rTMS, although but the effect was greaterpersisted for longer at after 20 Hz (treatment X time interaction for UPDRS and IADL (P = 0.075 and 0.04 respectively). Neither treatment affected motor thresholds, but 20 Hz rTMS increased MEP amplitude and the duration of transcallosal inhibition. In an exploratory analysis, Eeach group was subdivided into akinetic-rigid and tremor dominant subgroups and the effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz treatment recalculated. There is was weak evidence that patients with an akinetic-rigid presentation may respond better than those with predominant tremor. CONCLUSION: Both 20 Hz and 1 Hz rTMS improve motor function in PD, but 20 Hz rTMS is more effective and patients with an akinetic-rigid respond better than predominant tremor.

No abstract