In 2017, blowouts and then explosions occurred in a Middle Eastern oilfield. A root cause of the incident is lack of study and investigation of the past kicks and blowouts data. Therefore, as a pioneer work in the region, data gathering and analysis of past kicks and blowouts were made in the studied oilfield to learn lessons and find gaps. Out of the 149 drilled wells, a total of 117 kicks and three (3) blowouts occurred. In this work, a list of drilling parameters to be considered in data gathering and analysis were suggested as a guideline for future works elsewhere. The statistical analysis not only showed all the three exploration wells kicked which is not a surprise, but it also showed that 39 out of 146 (26.71%) also experienced kicks during reservoir drilling. The large number of kicks in development wells proved that possibility of kick occurrence in development wells is not low. In exploration wells, the predominant kick causes were gas-cut mud and insufficient mud weight which indicates the necessity of using pressure while drilling in addition to drilling rate control systems in exploration wells. However, in development wells, lost circulation was the predominant kick cause indicating the necessity of using low-weight drilling fluids and managed pressure drilling systems. The direct role of human error exists at least in 60% of kicks occurred in this field, which shows the great importance of improved drilling personnel training. Although only 3.45% kicks in development wells occurred due to improper hole fill-up during tripping, this cause should not only be deemed trivial, but it should also be taken seriously as being the cause of the blowout. The 2.56% possibility of kick conversion to blowouts and 67% risk of blowout conversion to explosion emphasize the necessity of maintaining primary well control and using efficient and early kick detection systems. Bullhead was the more commonly used method than standard well control methods; as this kill method may not always be safe, its application should be revised.
Coring is a considerably costly drilling operation, but vital to retrieve valuable sources of ground-truth data in the oil and gas industry. To justify the high cost of this operation, essentially, cores should not undergo jamming and mechanical damage. Core jamming not only indicates an unprecedented termination of the operation, but also causes severe damage to the core column already taken in the barrel. This means that the cores cannot be retrieved with sufficient key performance indicators (KPIs); thus, it would not reliably represent reservoir properties. Reaching this significant target can be ensured not only by proper design, but also by online monitoring and investigation of the drilling parameters. This investigation predicated on several case studies in the Middle East to identify the effect of imperfect decisions made by the driller. Based on the experience and observations, the paper provides practical recommendations to alleviate the impact of such negative actions. The drilling parameters observed in the mud logging data of six coring case studies (of several runs from three wells in carbonate reservoirs) were investigated at the depth interval just prior to jamming occurrence. These parameters consist of rate of penetration (ROP), torque, weight on the bit (WOB), rotary speed (revolutions per minute, RPM), circulation rate, and standpipe pressure (SPP). In this work, a main cause of the core jamming occurrences is discussed; that is, the improper drilling parameters application, as mismanaged by the driller. Finally, as indications of jamming, sudden variations of the drilling parameters at the specified depth were investigated. Such study can contributeto the better monitoring for future coring operations. Based on the observations in six case studies in three wells, WOB was identified as the most significant reason causing core jamming; that is, jamming occurred when the WOB was not steadily maintained on the bit probably due to the driller’s inexperience, shift change, etc. For monitoring, torque decrease, ROP decrease, and SPP variation or decrease (following initial increases) were identified as indications of core jamming. Torque showed to be a significant parameter forjamming detection when it decreases or its trend becomes completely straight, i.e., without any variations, indicating that the core head may not be in contact with the formation. Next, drilling issues during coring (such as pump failure) can contribute to subsequent jamming. The case studies in this paper provide several observations and indications of core jamming occurrences in a limestone reservoir which can be attributed to non-optimized drilling parameters. The paper also provides several practical recommendations and measures to prevent core jamming and core damage.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.