Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA):Jepsen, M. L., Ewert, S. D., & Dau, T. (2008 A model of computational auditory signal-processing and perception that accounts for various aspects of simultaneous and nonsimultaneous masking in human listeners is presented. The model is based on the modulation filterbank model described by Dau et al. ͓J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 2892 ͑1997͔͒ but includes major changes at the peripheral and more central stages of processing. The model contains outer-and middle-ear transformations, a nonlinear basilar-membrane processing stage, a hair-cell transduction stage, a squaring expansion, an adaptation stage, a 150-Hz lowpass modulation filter, a bandpass modulation filterbank, a constant-variance internal noise, and an optimal detector stage. The model was evaluated in experimental conditions that reflect, to a different degree, effects of compression as well as spectral and temporal resolution in auditory processing. The experiments include intensity discrimination with pure tones and broadband noise, tone-in-noise detection, spectral masking with narrow-band signals and maskers, forward masking with tone signals and tone or noise maskers, and amplitude-modulation detection with narrow-and wideband noise carriers. The model can account for most of the key properties of the data and is more powerful than the original model. The model might be useful as a front end in technical applications.

This study considered consequences of sensorineural hearing loss in ten listeners. The characterization of individual hearing loss was based on psychoacoustic data addressing audiometric pure-tone sensitivity, cochlear compression, frequency selectivity, temporal resolution, and intensity discrimination. In the experiments it was found that listeners with comparable audiograms can show very different results in the supra-threshold measures. In an attempt to account for the observed individual data, a model of auditory signal processing and perception [Jepsen et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 124, 422-438 (2008)] was used as a framework. The parameters of the cochlear processing stage of the model were adjusted to account for behaviorally estimated individual basilar-membrane input-output functions and the audiogram, from which the amounts of inner hair-cell and outer hair-cell losses were estimated as a function of frequency. All other model parameters were left unchanged. The predictions showed a reasonably good agreement with the measured individual data in the frequency selectivity and forward masking conditions while the variation of intensity discrimination thresholds across listeners was underestimated by the model. The model and the associated parameters for individual hearing-impaired listeners might be useful for investigating effects of individual hearing impairment in more complex conditions, such as speech intelligibility in noise.

The audibility of partials was measured for complex tones with partials uniformly spaced on an ERBN-number scale. On each trial, subjects heard a sinusoidal “probe” followed by a complex tone. The probe was mistuned downwards or upwards (at random) by 3% or 4.5% from the frequency of one randomly selected partial in the complex (the “target”). The subject indicated whether the target was higher or lower in frequency than the probe. The probe and the target were pulsed on and off and the ramp times and inter-pulse intervals were systematically varied. Performance was better for longer ramp times and longer inter-pulse intervals. In a second experiment, the ability to detect which of two complex tones contained a pulsed partial was measured. The pattern of results was similar to that for experiment 1. A model of auditory processing including an adaptation stage was able to account for the general pattern of the results of experiment 2. The results suggest that the improvement in ability to hear out a partial in a complex tone produced by pulsing that partial is partly mediated by a release from adaptation produced by the pulsing, and does not result solely from reduction of perceptual confusion.

Fast-acting compression can restore modulation detection thresholds for listeners with hearing loss to the values observed for listeners with NH. Despite this normalization of the modulation detection thresholds, compression does not seem to provide a benefit for speech intelligibility. Furthermore, fast-acting compression may not be able to restore MDD thresholds to the values observed for listeners with NH, suggesting that the two measures of amplitude modulation sensitivity represent different aspects of temporal processing. For listeners with NH, the ability to discriminate modulation depth was highly correlated with speech intelligibility in stationary noise.

The perceptual organization of two-tone sequences into auditory streams was investigated using a modeling framework consisting of an auditory pre-processing front end [Dau et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 2892-2905 (1997)] combined with a temporal coherence-analysis back end [Elhilali et al., Neuron 61, 317-329 (2009)]. Two experimental paradigms were considered: (i) Stream segregation as a function of tone repetition time (TRT) and frequency separation (Δf) and (ii) grouping of distant spectral components based on onset/offset synchrony. The simulated and experimental results of the present study supported the hypothesis that forward masking enhances the ability to perceptually segregate spectrally close tone sequences. Furthermore, the modeling suggested that effects of neural adaptation and processing though modulation-frequency selective filters may enhance the sensitivity to onset asynchrony of spectral components, facilitating the listeners' ability to segregate temporally overlapping sounds into separate auditory objects. Overall, the modeling framework may be useful to study the contributions of bottom-up auditory features on "primitive" grouping, also in more complex acoustic scenarios than those considered here.