Background and Objective: Guided bone regeneration allows new bone formation in anatomical sites showing defects preventing implant rehabilitation. Material and Methods: The present case series reported the outcomes of five patients treated with customized titanium meshes manufactured with a digital workflow for achieving bone regeneration at future implant sites. A significant gain in both width and thickness was achieved for all patients. Results: From a radiographic point of view (CBTC), satisfactory results were reached both in horizontal and vertical defects. An average horizontal gain of 3.6 ± 0.8 mm and a vertical gain of 5.2 ± 1.1 mm. Conclusions: The findings from this study suggest that customized titanium meshes represent a valid method to pursue guided bone regeneration in horizontal, vertical or combined defects. Particular attention must be paid by the surgeon in the packaging of the flap according to a correct method called the “poncho” technique in order to reduce the most frequent complication that is the exposure of the mesh even if a partial exposure of one mesh does not compromise the final outcome of both the reconstruction and the healing of the implants.
We performed this clinical study in order to evaluate the reliability of the Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) surgical technique through the use of customized CAD CAM titanium meshes (Yxoss CBR® Reoss) in order to show an alternative method of bone augmentation. Materials and methods: Nine patients presenting 10 bone defects were referred to solve oral dysfunction due to edentulous atrophic ridges. Guided bone regeneration was performed with titanium meshes combined with autogenous bone grafting and heterologous bovine bone mineral grafting, and exclusively a “poncho technique” soft tissue approach for all the cases. After a mean 9 months of graft healing (range 6–12 months), titanium meshes were removed, and implant surgery was subsequently performed. The results we obtained were positive in terms of volumetric increases in height, length and thickness of the atrophic ridges without biological complications detectable before implant surgery. Results: Out of nine, one site met titanium mesh exposure: however, in all 10 sites a three-dimensional volumetric bone implementation was obtained. The statistical results were estimated by uploading and superimposing cbct scans before and after CBR surgery for each patient, so it was possible evaluate the maximum linear vertical and horizontal bone gain through dedicated Cad Cam software (Exocad GmbH®). The average horizontal gain was 6.37 ± 2.17 mm (range 2.78–9.12 mm) and vertical gain was 5.95 ± 2.06 mm (range 2.68–9.02 mm). A total of 18 implants were placed into the grafted sites with a 100% survival rate (clearly they are relative percentages to be compared to the short time elapsed). Conclusions: The results we obtained in this study suggest that this CBR procedure (Yxoss® by Reoss) is reliable and safe for bone regeneration to allow implant-prosthetic restoration in horizontal, vertical and combined bone defects. The soft tissue management is diriment: all the cases were managed with a “poncho” flap approach to decrease exposure complication.
We describe two clinical cases of occasional radiographic findings on orthopantomography (OPG) that were performed routinely, for which the definitive diagnosis may be uncertain. After an accurate remote and recent anamnesis, for reasons of exclusion, we hypothesize a rare case of the retention of a contrast medium in the parenchyma of the major salivary glands (parotid, submandibular, and sublingual) and their excretory ducts as a consequence of sialography examination. In the first case we analyzed, we found it difficult to classify the radiographic signs on the sublingual glands, left parotid, and submandibular, while in the second case, only the right parotid was involved. Using CBCT, the spherical findings were highlighted, with multiple having different dimensions, as well as radiopaque in their peripheral portion and more radiolucent inside them. We could immediately exclude salivary calculi, which usually have a more elongated/ovoid shape and appear homogeneously radiopaque without radiolucency areas. These two cases (of hypothetic medium contrast retention with unusual and atypical clinical-radiographic presentation) have very rarely been comprehensively and correctly documented in the literature. No papers have a follow-up longer than 5 years. We conducted a review of the literature on the PubMed database, finding only six articles reporting similar cases. Most of them were old articles, demonstrating the low frequency of this phenomenon. The research was performed using the following keywords: “sialography”, “contrast medium”, “retention” (six papers) and “sialography”, and “retention” (13 papers). Some articles were present in both searches, and the really significant ones (defined after a careful reading of the entire article and not only of the abstract) resulted only in six occurrences in a time span from 1976 to 2022.
Since its inception, modern dentistry has been a discipline in continuous evolution. Thanks to this progress, the prosthetic rehabilitation of the edentulous patient can now be effectively addressed by multiple therapeutic approaches rooted in the decision-making marriage between patient and clinician in both partial and total edentulous patients. From a historical perspective, the aesthetic-functional restoration of the completely edentulous maxillary arch has been subverted in the possibilities of intervention by the introduction of implantology, which has made it possible to overcome the otherwise mandatory use of removable devices with complete mucous support (1). The current study is intended to be an example of this evolution by describing one out of five clinical cases performed. Furthermore, it is intended to demonstrate how the newly proposed implant-prosthetic techniques, where a fixed implant rehabilitation is not possible due to age constraints, lack of bone support or unfavourable mechanical-aesthetics parameters, allow the rehabilitation of the upper total edentulous jaw with a removable device without a solidarizing intermediate bar to rely upon for the implants. The implants and the whole rehabilitation are, however, consolidated thanks to the stability provided by the presence of a telescopic connection, combining viable long-term survival (2) with optimal results for the patient in terms of cost (3), comfort, chewing capability (4), aesthetics and home hygiene.
The aim of this study was to compare Orthopantomograms (OPT) and Computed Tomography (CT) with Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in patients with Medication-Related OsteoNecrosis of the Jaws (MRONJ). The study included 25 patients (6 males and 19 females) with MRONJ who had a history of long-term bisphosphonate therapy or one of the recently re-entered MRONJ drugs and underwent OPT, CT and/or CBCT for determination of the extent of disease. We excluded patients with maxillary neoplasia. Considering the presence of early and late signs, OPT was diagnostic in 6 out of 17 cases (35%), while CT and CBCT were diagnostic in 25 out of 25 cases (100%). Analysing the different radiant doses delivered by the selected radiological methods on a phantom, it was found that a more significant effective dose was spread by CT (2.6 mSv) than CBCT (0.164 mSv) or OPT (0.02 mSv). CBCT, from our experience, is a candidate to replace OPT in the first diagnostic step in patients with suspected MRONJ, generating less effective doses and artefacts from metal components than CT.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.