Roughened implant surfaces are thought to enhance osseointegration. Torque removal forces have been used as a biomechanical measure of anchorage or osseointegration in which the greater forces required to remove implants may be interpreted as an increase in the strength of osseointegration. The purpose of this study was to compare the torque resistance to removal of screw shaped titanium implants having an acid etched (HC1/H2SO4) surface (Osseotite) with implants having a machined surface. Two custom screw shaped implants, 1 acid etched and the other machined, were placed into the distal femurs of 10 adult New Zealand White rabbits. These implants were 3.25 mm in diameter x 4.00 mm in length without holes, grooves or slots to resist rotation. Following a 2 month healing period, the implants were removed under reverse torque rotation with a digital torque measuring device. Two implants with the machined surface preparation failed to achieve osseointegration. All other implants were found to be anchored to bone. Resistance to torque removal was found to be 4 x greater for the implants with the acid etched surface as compared to the implants with the machined surface. The mean torque values were 20.50 +/- 6.59 N cm and 4.95 +/- 1.61 N cm for the acid etched and machined surfaces respectively. The results of this study suggest that chemical etching of the titanium implant surface significantly increases the strength of osseointegration as determined by resistance to reverse torque rotation.
Background The incidence of oral mucositis (any grade) after everolimus treatment is 58% in the general population and 81% in Asian patients. This study hypothesized that professional oral care (POC) before everolimus treatment could reduce the incidence of everolimus‐induced oral mucositis. Materials and Methods This randomized, multicenter, open‐label, phase III study evaluated the efficacy of POC in preventing everolimus‐induced mucositis. Patients were randomized into POC and control groups (1:1 ratio) and received everolimus with exemestane. Patients in the POC group underwent teeth surface cleaning, scaling, and tongue cleaning before everolimus initiation and continued to receive weekly POC throughout the 8‐week treatment period. Patients in the control group brushed their own teeth and gargled with 0.9% sodium chloride solution or water. The primary endpoint was the incidence of all grades of oral mucositis. We targeted acquisition of 200 patients with a 2‐sided type I error rate of 5% and 80% power to detect 25% risk reduction. Results Between March 2015 and December 2017, we enrolled 175 women from 31 institutions, of which five did not receive the protocol treatment and were excluded. Over the 8 weeks, the incidence of grade 1 oral mucositis was significantly different between the POC group (76.5%, 62 of 82 patients) and control group (89.7%, 78 of 87 patients; p = .034). The incidence of grade 2 (severe) oral mucositis was also significantly different between the POC group (34.6%, 28 of 82 patients) and control group (54%, 47 of 87 patients; p = .015). As a result of oral mucositis, 18 (22.0%) patients in the POC group and 28 (32.2%) in the control group had to undergo everolimus dose reduction. Conclusion POC reduced the incidence and severity of oral mucositis in patients receiving everolimus and exemestane. This might be considered as a treatment option of oral care for patients undergoing this treatment. Clinical trial identification number: NCT 02069093. Implications for Practice The Oral Care‐BC trial that prophylactically used professional oral care (POC), available worldwide, did not show a greater than 25% difference in mucositis. The 12% difference in grade 1 or higher mucositis and especially the ∼20% difference in grade 2 mucositis are likely clinically meaningful to patients. POC before treatment should be considered as a treatment option of oral care for postmenopausal patients who are receiving everolimus and exemestane for treatment of hormone receptor‐positive, HER2‐negative advanced breast cancer and metastatic breast cancer. However, POC was not adequate for prophylactic oral mucositis in these patients, and dexamethasone mouthwash prophylaxis is standard treatment before everolimus.
Objectives Dry socket and post-extraction pain are typical discomforts experienced by patients after tooth extraction. In this study, we inserted gauze coated with oxytetracycline-hydrocortisone ointment into the extraction socket immediately after lower third molar extraction and then evaluated the occurrence of dry socket and post-extraction pain compared with gauze non-insertion. Methods This retrospective study was carried out on patients undergoing lower third molar extraction in the Department of Oral Surgery at Shizuoka Prefectural General Hospital in Shizuoka, Japan from November 2018 to October 2019. A comparison was carried out between a gauze-insertion group and a non-insertion group. The occurrence versus non-occurrence of dry socket was determined, and degree of pain was assessed based on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and on patients reporting the number of loxoprofen sodium oral analgesic tablets (60mg/tablet) that they had taken. Dry socket was defined as patient-reported spontaneous pain that did not subside 1 to 3 days postoperatively. Spontaneous post-extraction pain was recorded four times: on the operative day, on the first postoperative day (POD1), on POD3, and during suture removal (POD7). Results The occurrence of dry socket was lower in the gauze-insertion group than in the non-insertion group (0.9%, 2/215 vs. 19.6%, 9/46, p<0.001). The results also showed that both VAS-defined pain level and the number of analgesic tablets taken were lower in the gauze-insertion group than in the non-insertion group on POD3 and POD7. Conclusions and clinical relevance Inserting gauze coated with oxytetracycline-hydrocortisone ointment into the extraction socket immediately after third molar extraction reduces the occurrence of both dry socket and post-extraction pain.
The expression of Fc receptors (FcR) for IgA (Fc alpha R) as well as for IgE (Fc epsilon R) on T lymphocytes (T cells) is enhanced or up regulated by the corresponding class of immunoglobulins (Ig). The production of class-specific regulatory factors binding to IgA and IgE (IgA binding factor [IgA-BF]; IgE binding factor [IgE-BF]) is also induced by these respective ligands. Murine IgA-BFs produced by a T hybridoma T2D4 and concanavalin A-activated spleen cells suppressed the in vitro IgA antibody responses of pokeweed mitogen-stimulated mouse spleen cells class-specifically. Human IgA antibody response was also suppressed by the murine IgA-BF. Similar suppressive IgA-BF is also produced by a human natural killer (NK)-like cell line (YT), which has no rearrangement of the T cell receptor beta-chain gene, indicating that non-T non-B/LGL cells may also be involved in the regulation of the class-specific antibody responses. It appears that, in human as well as murine systems, T- and NK-cells have the capacity to co-express multiple class-specific FcRs and to produce the corresponding immunoglobulin binding factors. While the Fc epsilon R expression is abnormally enhanced in the diseases with hyperimmunoglobulinemia E, disregulation of Fc alpha R is associated with certain human diseases involving the altered IgA regulation. In IgA nephropathy, which is characterized by increased serum IgA level and IgA deposition in the mesangium, there is an enhancement of the expression of Fc alpha R. In contrast, IgA failed to induce Fc alpha R significantly on the lymphocytes from the patients with selective IgA deficiency, indicating that Fc alpha R plays an important role in the IgA regulation in vivo.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.