Major professional organizations have called for psychosocial risk screening to identify specific psychosocial needs of children with cancer and their families and facilitate the delivery of appropriate evidence-based care to address these concerns. However, systematic screening of risk factors at diagnosis is rare in pediatric oncology practice. Subsequent to a brief summary of psychosocial risks in pediatric cancer and the rationale for screening, this review identified three screening models and two screening approaches (Distress Thermometer [DT], Psychosocial Assessment Tool [PAT]), among many more papers calling for screening. Implications of broadly implemented screening for all patients across treatment settings are discussed.
Interventions using delivery methods varying from traditional counseling to computers achieved moderate to strong efficacy and merit replication. Survivor needs related to transition to adult-oriented health care and school reentry were not addressed by existing interventions. This review also revealed the absence of health behavior interventions for survivors in middle childhood and late adolescence. Intervention formats that are cost-effective and reduce participant burden should be prioritized for further testing. To broaden the reach and appeal of interventions, alternative delivery methods, such as mobile phone software applications, should be evaluated.
Background
While poor adherence to hormonal therapies such as aromatase inhibitors (AIs) is widely documented, less is known about whether health beliefs predict treatment non-adherence. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between health beliefs (perceived susceptibility to breast cancer, perceived benefits of AI treatment, perceived barriers to AI treatment) and adherence to AIs.
Methods
Postmenopausal women with early stage estrogen receptor positive breast cancer who were currently on an AI completed the three-factor Health Beliefs and Medication Adherence in Breast Cancer (HBMABC) scale and questionnaires about their demographics and symptoms. Adherence data (treatment gaps and premature discontinuation) were abstracted from participants’ medical charts. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between health beliefs and adherence.
Results
Among 437 participants, 93 (21.3%) were non-adherent. Those who perceived greater barriers to their AI treatment were more likely to display AI non-adherence behaviors by the end of their treatment period than those who reported fewer barriers to AI therapy (adjusted odds ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval: 1.03 – 2.86, p = 0.04). In contrast, perceived susceptibility to cancer recurrence and perceived benefits of AIs did not predict AI adherence. Minorities had lower perceived susceptibility to breast cancer recurrence and higher perceived barriers to AI treatment (p < 0.05 for both).
Conclusions
Greater perceived barriers predicted non-adherence to AIs. Interventions addressing women’s negative beliefs about the challenges of AI treatment are needed to help optimize adherence in breast cancer survivors.
Perceptions of ageing related to arthralgia and depressive symptoms predicted non-adherence to AIs. These findings suggest that interventions that address negative beliefs about ageing due to AI-related arthralgia and depressive mood can potentially improve rates of adherence to AIs.
Background
Supporting the family-as-a-whole presents challenges in palliative care, although family meetings are increasingly used in routine practice. The Family Focused Grief Therapy (FFGT) Model guides clinicians in using a range of intervention strategies.
Aim
To examine the therapists’ techniques used in assessing ‘at risk’ families in palliative care to better illuminate what helps and what remains challenging.
Method
Recorded sessions 1 and 2 were coded using the FFGT fidelity coding measure, with its glossary of definitions. Inter-rater reliability between three coders was satisfactory at 88%. Frequencies of strategy utilization were computed, with extraction of examples of both successful and problematic approaches.
Setting/participants
From within a larger study of family therapy during palliative care at a comprehensive cancer center, the first two sessions (n = 144) delivered to 74 families (299 individuals) by 32 therapists were coded and analyzed.
Results
Therapists readily explored the story of illness and families’ ways of coping (97%) and assessed communication and cohesiveness in the majority. Exploration of relational patterns occurred in 89% of sessions, use of a genogram in 80%, understanding members’ roles in 65% and family values and beliefs In 62%. Less use was made of summaries (39%), family mottos (34%), exploration of family conflict (35%) and the formalization of a comprehensive family treatment plan (20%).
Conclusions
Challenges exist in therapy with difficult families. Therapy in the home brings special issues. Therapists can apply most of the interventions prescribed by the FFGT model.
Findings from a representative survey of youth in northern Uganda suggest that former female child soldiers experience a range of distress symptoms, have initial problems reintegrating, and have fewer education and employment opportunities than males. Given the multiple layers of needs, the findings pose a question of where best to intervene. Would broad-based economic programs address this population's poverty while also indirectly addressing mental health symptoms by reducing stress and improving social capital? This article describes how these findings led to the development and evaluation of an economic and social program designed to reduce daily stressors and improve this population's economic, social, and psychological outcomes through livelihoods training, a cash grant for small business development, and follow-up support.In the aftermath of mass violence, agencies and policymakers are faced with tough decisions about how to allocate limited resources to help individuals, families, and communities recover and rebuild. In postconflict settings like
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.