Recent studies have demonstrated a suboptimal humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in patients diagnosed with hematologic malignancies, however data about cellular immunogenicity is scarce. In this study we aimed to evaluate both the humoral and cellular immunogenicity one month after the second dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine. Antibody titers were measured by the Elecsys and LIAISON Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay while T-cell response was assessed by Interferon-Gamma-Release-immuno-Assay technology. Overall, 76.3% (184/241) of patients developed humoral immunity and the cellular response rate was 79% (184/233). Hypogammaglobulinemia, lymphopenia, active hematological treatment and anti-CD20 therapy during the last 6 months were associated with an inferior humoral response. Conversely, age over 65 years, active disease, lymphopenia and immunosuppressive treatment for GvHD were associated with an impaired cellular response. A significant dissociation between humoral and cellular response was observed in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy, being the humoral response of 17.5% whereas the cellular response was 71.1%. In these patients B-cell aplasia was confirmed while T cell counts were preserved. In contrast, humoral response was observed in 77.3% of patients under immunosuppressive treatment for GvHD, while only 52.4% had cellular response. The cellular and humoral response to the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccine in patients with hematological malignancies is highly influenced by the presence of treatments like anti-CD20 therapy and immunosuppressive agents. This observation has implications for the further management of these patients.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has caused high mortality in patients with hematological malignancies (HM). 1 The newly emerged omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2 harbor multiple novel spike protein mutations that raise concerns about vaccine efficiency and antiviral efficacy of the available therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. 2 The first published clinical data in immunocompetent patients have found that infection with omicron variants is associated with reduced vaccine efficiency compared to the delta variants, but decreased hospital admission and mortality. 3,4 Preliminary, prepublished, data from a large case-control study have shown that the vaccine effect against omicron in immunocompromised patients, including HM patients, is even more reduced, but data regarding clinical outcomes are lacking. 5 The aim of this study was to describe risk factors, antiviral treatment and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant infection in 593 HM patients included in the EPICOVIDEHA registry.EPICOVIDEHA is an international open web-based registry for patients with HM infected with SARS-CoV-2. 1,6 Both hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients are eligible for inclusion. The questionnaire includes data on the HM, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status, risk factors for severe COVID-19 infection, SARS-CoV-2 virus variant, antiviral treatment, and outcomes including mortality (eFigure 1 and eTable 4).

BackgroundThe outcome of COVID-19 in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients is almost uniformely considered poor. The aim of present study was to retrospectively analyse the outcome and risk factors for mortality in a large series of patients who developed COVID-19 infection after an allogeneic HSCT.MethodsThis multicenter retrospective study promoted by the European Hematology Association – Infections in Hematology Study Working Group, included 326 adult HSCT patients who had COVID-19 between January 2020 and March 2022.ResultsThe median time from HSCT to the diagnosis of COVID-19 was 268 days (IQR 86-713; range 0-185 days). COVID-19 severity was mild in 21% of the patients, severe in 39% and critical in 16% of the patients. In multivariable analysis factors associated with a higher risk of mortality were, age above 50 years, presence of 3 or more comorbidities, active hematologic disease at time of COVID-19 infection, development of COVID-19 within 12 months of HSCT, and severe/critical infections. Overall mortality rate was 21% (n=68): COVID-19 was the main or secondary cause of death in 16% of the patients (n=53).ConclusionsMortality in HSCT recipients who develop COVID-19 is high and largely dependent on age, comorbidities, active hematologic disease, timing from transplant and severity of the infection.

No abstract

No abstract

Limited data have been published on the epidemiology and outcomes of breakthrough COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancy (HM) after anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Adult HM who received at least one dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and diagnosed with breakthrough COVID-19 between January 2021 and March 2022 and registered in EPICOVIDEHA were included in this analysis. A total of 1548 cases were included, mainly with lymphoid malignancies (1181 cases, 76%). After viral genome sequencing in 753 cases (49%), Omicron variant was prevalent (517, 68.7%). Most of the patients received at least two vaccine doses before COVID-19 (1419, 91%), mostly mRNA-based (1377, 89%). Overall, 906 patients (59%) received specific treatment for COVID-19. After 30-days follow-up from COVID-19 diagnosis, 143 patients (9%) died. The mortality rate in patients with Omicron variant was of 7.9%, comparable to that reported for the other variants. The 30-day mortality rate was significantly lower than in the pre-vaccine era (31%). In the univariable analysis, older age (p<0.001), active HM (p<0.001), severe and critical COVID-19 (p=0.007 and p<0.001, respectively) were associated with mortality. Conversely, patients receiving monoclonal antibodies, even for severe or critical COVID-19, had a lower mortality rate (p<0.001). In the multivariable model, older age, active disease, critical COVID-19 and at least 2-3 comorbidities were correlated with a higher mortality, whereas the administration of monoclonal antibodies, alone (p<0.001) or combined with antivirals (p=0.009), was observed protective. While mortality is significantly lower than in the pre-vaccination era, breakthrough COVID-19 in HM is still associated with considerable mortality. Death rate was lower in patients who received monoclonal antibodies, alone or in combination with antivirals. EPICOVIDEHA (www.clinicaltrials.gov; National Clinical Trials identifier NCT04733729) is an international open web-based registry for patients with HMs infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a thrombotic microangiopathy caused by anti-ADAMTS13 antibodies. Caplacizumab is approved for adults with an acute episode of iTTP in conjunction with PEX and immunosuppression. The objective of this study is to analyze and compare the safety and efficacy of caplacizumab versus the standard of care and assess the effect of the concomitant use of rituximab. A retrospective study from the Spanish TTP Registry of patients treated with caplacizumab vs those who did not receive it was conducted. A total of 155 iTTP patients (77 caplacizumab, 78 no caplacizumab) were included. Patients initially treated with caplacizumab had fewer exacerbations (4.5% vs 20.5% p<0.05) and less refractoriness (4.5% vs 14.1% p<0.05) than those that were not treated. Time to clinical response was shorter when caplacizumab was used as initial treatment vs caplacizumab used after refractoriness or exacerbation. The multivariate analysis showed that its use in the first 3 days after plasma exchange (PEX) was associated with a lower number of PEX (OR 7.5, CI 2.3-12.7; p<0.05) and days of hospitalization (OR 11.2, CI 5.6-16.9; p<0.001) compared to standard therapy. There was no difference in time to clinical remission in patients treated with caplacizumab compared to the use of rituximab. No severe adverse event was described in the caplacizumab group. In summary, caplacizumab reduced exacerbations and refractoriness compared to standard of care regimens. When administered within the first 3 days after PEX it also provided a faster clinical response, reducing hospitalization time and the need for PEX.

No abstract