No abstract

A proof-labeling scheme, introduced by Korman, Kutten and Peleg [PODC 2005], is a mechanism enabling to certify the legality of a network configuration with respect to a boolean predicate. Such a mechanism finds applications in many frameworks, including the design of fault-tolerant distributed algorithms. In a prooflabeling scheme, the verification phase consists of exchanging labels between neighbors. The size of these labels depends on the network predicate to be checked. There are predicates requiring large labels, of polylogarithmic size (e.g., MST), or even polynomial size (e.g., Symmetry). In this paper, we introduce the notion of randomized proof-labeling schemes. By reduction from deterministic schemes, we show that randomization enables the amount of communication to be exponentially reduced. As a consequence, we show that checking any network predicate can be done with probability of correctness as close to one as desired by exchanging just a logarithmic number of bits between neighbors. Moreover, we design a novel space lower bound technique that applies to both deterministic and randomized proof-labeling schemes. Using this technique, we establish several tight bounds on the verification complexity of classical distributed computing problems, such as MST construction, and of classical predicates such as acyclicity, connectivity, and cycle length.

Abstract. Verifying that a network configuration satisfies a given boolean predicate is a fundamental problem in distributed computing. Many variations of this problem have been studied, for example, in the context of proof labeling schemes (PLS), locally checkable proofs (LCP), and nondeterministic local decision (NLD). In all of these contexts, verification time is assumed to be constant. Korman, Kutten and Masuzawa [15] presented a proof-labeling scheme for MST, with poly-logarithmic verification time, and logarithmic memory at each vertex. In this paper we introduce the notion of a t-PLS, which allows the verification procedure to run for super-constant time. Our work analyzes the tradeoffs of t-PLS between time, label size, message length, and computation space. We construct a universal t-PLS and prove that it uses the same amount of total communication as a known one-round universal PLS, and t factor smaller labels. In addition, we provide a general technique to prove lower bounds for space-time tradeoffs of t-PLS. We use this technique to show an optimal tradeoff for testing that a network is acyclic (cycle free). Our optimal t-PLS for acyclicity uses label size and computation space O((log n)/t). We further describe a recursive O(log * n) space verifier for acyclicity which does not assume previous knowledge of the run-time t.

Distributed proofs are mechanisms that enable the nodes of a network to collectively and efficiently check the correctness of Boolean predicates on the structure of the network (e.g., having a specific diameter), or on objects distributed over the nodes (e.g., a spanning tree). We consider well known mechanisms consisting of two components: a prover that assigns a certificate to each node, and a distributed algorithm called a verifier that is in charge of verifying the distributed proof formed by the collection of all certificates. We show that many network predicates have distributed proofs offering a high level of redundancy, explicitly or implicitly. We use this remarkable property of distributed proofs to establish perfect tradeoffs between the size of the certificate stored at every node, and the number of rounds of the verification protocol.

No abstract