Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are the primary binding sites for nicotine within the brain. Using alpha(α)2 nAChR subunit-null mutant mice, the current study evaluates whether the absence of this gene product during mecamylamine-precipitated nicotine withdrawal eliminates neuronal activity within selective midbrain and limbic brain regions, as determined by the expression of the immediate early gene, cfos. Our results demonstrate that nicotine withdrawal enhances neuronal activity within the interpeduncular nucleus and dorsal hippocampus, which is absent in mice null for α2-containing nAChRs. In contrast, we observe that α2-null mutant mice exhibit a suppression of neuronal activity in the dentate gyrus in mice undergoing nicotine withdrawal. Interestingly, α2-null mutant mice display potentiated neuronal activity specifically within the stratum lacunosum moleculare layer of the hippocampus, independent of nicotine withdrawal. Overall, our findings demonstrate that α2-null mutant mice have altered cfos expression in distinct populations of neurons within selective midbrain and limbic brain structures that mediate baseline and nicotine withdrawal-induced neuronal activity.
Objectives
Determine the ability of three staging systems to stratify the risk of nodal metastases in cases of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Examine differential staging of tumors across the three systems and the resulting implications for clinical decision making.
Study Design
Retrospective chart review.
Methods
This study included 118 patients who underwent excision of primary cSCC of the head and neck as well as elective neck dissection for the same tumor between 2006 and 2017. Tumors were staged using the 2010 7th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC 7) staging system, the 2016 8th edition AJCC staging system (AJCC 8), and the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) alternative tumor staging system published in 2013.
Results
There were 28 patients (23.7%) with positive nodal metastases at the time of tumor excision. Almost all tumors staged as tumor (T)2 using AJCC 7 were upstaged to T3 or T4 using the new AJCC 8, and these two groups accounted for the majority of the nodal metastases. Similarly, the BWH‐staged T3 group contained the highest number of tumors with nodal metastases. None of the three staging systems significantly stratified tumors in a manner that predicted the presence of nodal metastases.
Conclusion
Individuals with cSCC tumors staged T3 or higher in the AJCC 8 and BWH staging systems should undergo neck dissection, whereas those with lower staging should be discussed with the patient on a case‐by‐case basis.
Level of Evidence: 4
ObjectivePatients with advanced laryngeal cancer are typically presented with divergent treatment options, namely chemoradiation versus total laryngectomy. This study aims to understand general perspectives of the factors involved in this decision‐making process.MethodsSurveys were constructed using specialized conjoint analysis software. Seven attributes integral to the decision‐making process for advanced laryngeal cancer treatment were included.ResultsThree hundred one healthy adult volunteers completed the decision‐making program. The relative impact of each treatment attribute on decision making across all participants was scored with an average importance score (standard deviation) as follows: Lifespan 22.2% (±8.5), Voicing 21.4% (±5.9), Swallowing 19.1% (±7.3), Cancer Cure 14.9% (±6.2), Mode of Breathing 11.0% (±3.7), Self‐Image 6.7% (±2.9), and Treatment Type 4.8% (±3.0).ConclusionsGeneral public opinion ranked lifespan, voicing, and swallowing aspects as similarly important, and all were ranked more important than probability of cure. These data demonstrate a variety of priorities among participants and the need for tailored discussions when determining treatment choice for advanced laryngeal cancer.Level of EvidenceLevel 4.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.