Protein Ser/Thr phosphatase-1 (PP1) catalyzes the majority of eukaryotic protein dephosphorylation reactions in a highly regulated and selective manner. Recent studies have identified an unusually diversified PP1 interactome with the properties of a regulatory toolkit. PP1-interacting proteins (PIPs) function as targeting subunits, substrates and/or inhibitors. As targeting subunits, PIPs contribute to substrate selection by bringing PP1 into the vicinity of specific substrates and by modulating substrate specificity via additional substrate docking sites or blocking substrate-binding channels. Many of the nearly 200 established mammalian PIPs are predicted to be intrinsically disordered, a property that facilitates their binding to a large surface area of PP1 via multiple docking motifs. These novel insights offer perspectives for the therapeutic targeting of PP1 by interfering with the binding of PIPs or substrates.

The ubiquitous protein Ser/Thr phosphatase-1 (PP1) interacts with dozens of regulatory proteins that are structurally unrelated. However, most of them share a short, degenerate "RVxF"-type docking motif. Using a broad in silico screening based on a stringent definition of the RVxF motif, in combination with a multistep biochemical validation procedure, we have identified 78 novel mammalian PP1 interactors. A global analysis of the validated RVxF-based PP1 interactome not only provided insights into the conserved features of the RVxF motif but also led to the discovery of additional common PP1 binding elements, described as the "SILK" and "MyPhoNE" motifs. In addition to the doubling of the known mammalian PP1 interactome, our data contribute to the design of PP1 interaction networks. Notably, an interaction network linking PP1 interactors discloses a pleiotropic role of PP1 in cell polarity.

Ser/Thr protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) is a single‐domain hub protein with nearly 200 validated interactors in vertebrates. PP1‐interacting proteins (PIPs) are ubiquitously expressed but show an exceptional diversity in brain, testis and white blood cells. The binding of PIPs is mainly mediated by short motifs that dock to surface grooves of PP1. Although PIPs often contain variants of the same PP1 binding motifs, they differ in the number and combination of docking sites. This molecular‐lego strategy for binding to PP1 creates holoenzymes with unique properties. The PP1 binding code can be described as specific, universal, degenerate, nonexclusive and dynamic. PIPs control associated PP1 by interference with substrate recruitment or access to the active site. In addition, some PIPs have a subcellular targeting domain that promotes dephosphorylation by increasing the local concentration of PP1. The diversity of the PP1 interactome and the properties of the PP1 binding code account for the exquisite specificity of PP1 in vivo.

Presenilins 1 and 2 are unglycosylated proteins with apparent molecular mass of 45 and 50 kDa, respectively, in transfected COS-1 and Chinese hamster ovary cells. They colocalize with proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus in transfected and untransfected cells. In COS-1 cells low amounts of intact endogeneous presenilin 1 migrating at 45 kDa are detected together with relative larger amounts of presenilin 1 fragments migrating between 18 and 30 kDa. The presenilins have a strong tendency to form aggregates (mass of 100 -250 kDa) in SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, which can be partially resolved when denatured by SDS at 37°C instead of 95°C. Sulfation, glycosaminoglycan modification, or acylation of the presenilins was not observed, but both proteins are posttranslationally phosphorylated on serine residues. The mutations Ala-246 3 Glu or Cys-410 3 Tyr that cause Alzheimer's disease do not interfere with the biosynthesis or phosphorylation of presenilin 1. Finally, using low concentrations of digitonin to selectively permeabilize the cell membrane but not the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, it is demonstrated that the two major hydrophilic domains of presenilin 1 are oriented to the cytoplasm. The current investigation documents the posttranslational modifications and subcellular localization of the presenilins and indicates that postulated interactions with amyloid precursor protein metabolism should occur in the early compartments of the biosynthetic pathway.

Most interactors of protein phosphatase-1 (PP1) contain a variant of a so-called "RVXF" sequence that binds to a hydrophobic groove of the catalytic subunit. A combination of sequence alignments and site-directed mutagenesis has enabled us to further define the consensus sequence for this degenerate motif as [RK]-X 0 -1 -[VI]-{P}-[FW], where X denotes any residue and {P} any residue except Pro. Naturally occurring RVXF sequences differ in their affinity for PP1, and we show by swapping experiments that this binding affinity is an important determinant of the inhibitory potency of the regulators NIPP1 and inhibitor-1. Also, inhibition by NIPP1-(143-224) was retained when the RVXF motif (plus the preceding Ser) was swapped for either of two unrelated PP1-binding sequences from human inhibitor-2, i.e. KGILK or RKLHY. Conversely, the KGILK motif of inhibitor-2 could be functionally replaced by the RVXF motif of NIPP1. Our data provide additional evidence for the view that the RVXF and KGILK motifs function as anchors for PP1 and thereby promote the interaction of secondary binding sites that determine the activity and substrate specificity of the enzyme.The ubiquitous protein serine/threonine phosphatases of type 1 (PP1) 1 and type 2A (PP2A) interact with dozens of different polypeptides that function as substrates, inhibitors, chaperones, anchoring/scaffolding proteins, or substrate-specifiers and are often multifunctional (1-3). For example, the glycogen-associated G-subunits not only target PP1 to the glycogen particles but also increase the specific activity of PP1 toward the substrate glycogen synthase. Similarly, protein kinase Nek2 is a substrate for associated PP1 and targets the centrosomal protein C-Nap1 for dephosphorylation by PP1. In addition, Nek2 mediates cell cycle-dependent control of centrosomal PP1. The promiscuity of PP1 and PP2A in their interaction with other polypeptides accounts for the presence of these enzymes in a large variety of different holoenzymes. The sharing of catalytic subunits between holoenzymes also explains why higher eukaryotes can manage with 15 times fewer protein serine/threonine phosphatases than protein serine/threonine kinases (4).Mammalian genomes contain three genes that encode isoforms of PP1 (1, 3). These isoforms (35-38 kDa) are about 90% identical, and the differences are mainly concentrated in the extremities. Although some PP1 interactors such as the neurabins (5, 6) interact with PP1 in an isoform-specific manner, most interactors do not discriminate between PP1 isoforms, implying that the major interactor binding sites reside in the catalytic core, i.e. the central three-quarters of the protein. The surface of the catalytic core is too small to harbor specific binding sites for each of the 65 known mammalian interactors. The available evidence rather suggests that PP1 interactors compete for a limited number of common or overlapping binding sites (discussed in Ref.

The transient mitotic histone H3 phosphorylation by various protein kinases regulates chromosome condensation and segregation, but the counteracting phosphatases have been poorly characterized [1-8]. We show here that PP1γ is the major histone H3 phosphatase acting on the mitotically phosphorylated (ph) residues H3T3ph, H3S10ph, H3T11ph, and H3S28ph. In addition, we identify Repo-Man, a chromosome-bound interactor of PP1γ [9], as a selective regulator of H3T3ph and H3T11ph dephosphorylation. Repo-Man promotes H3T11ph dephosphorylation by an indirect mechanism but directly and specifically targets H3T3ph for dephosphorylation by associated PP1γ. The PP1γ/Repo-Man complex opposes the protein kinase Haspin-mediated spreading of H3T3ph to the chromosome arms until metaphase and catalyzes the net dephosphorylation of H3T3ph at the end of mitosis. Consistent with these findings, Repo-Man modulates in a PP1-dependent manner the H3T3ph-regulated chromosomal targeting of Aurora kinase B and its substrate MCAK. Our study defines a novel mechanism by which PP1 counteracts Aurora B.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a life-threatening brain tumor. Accumulating evidence suggests that eradication of glioma stem-like cells (GSCs) in GBM is essential to achieve cure. The transcription factor FOXM1 has recently gained attention as a master regulator of mitotic progression of cancer cells in various organs. Here, we demonstrate that FOXM1 forms a protein complex with the mitotic kinase MELK in GSCs, leading to phosphorylation and activation of FOXM1 in a MELK kinase-dependent manner. This MELK-dependent activation of FOXM1 results in a subsequent increase in mitotic regulatory genes in GSCs. MELK-driven FOXM1 activation is regulated by the binding and subsequent trans-phosphorylation of FOXM1 by another kinase PLK1. Using mouse neural progenitor cells (NPCs), we found that transgenic expression of FOXM1 enhances, while siRNA-mediated gene silencing diminishes neurosphere formation, suggesting that FOXM1 is required for NPC growth. During tumorigenesis, FOXM1 expression sequentially increases as cells progress from NPCs, to pretumorigenic progenitors and GSCs. The antibiotic Siomycin A disrupts MELK-mediated FOXM1 signaling with a greater sensitivity in GSC compared to neural stem cell. Treatment with the first-line chemotherapy agent for GBM, Temozolomide, paradoxically enriches for both FOXM1 (+) and MELK (+) cells in GBM cells, and addition of Siomycin A to Temozolomide treatment in mice harboring GSC-derived intracranial tumors enhances the effects of the latter. Collectively, our data indicate that FOXM1 signaling through its direct interaction with MELK regulates key mitotic genes in GSCs in a PLK1-dependent manner and thus, this protein complex is a potential therapeutic target for GBM. Stem Cells 2013;31:1051–1063

Chromatin remodeling through histone posttranslational modifications (PTMs) and DNA methylation has recently been implicated in cognitive functions, but the mechanisms involved in such epigenetic regulation remain poorly understood. Here, we show that protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) is a critical regulator of chromatin remodeling in the mammalian brain that controls histone PTMs and gene transcription associated with long-term memory. Our data show that PP1 is present at the chromatin in brain cells and interacts with enzymes of the epigenetic machinery including HDAC1 (histone deacetylase 1) and histone demethylase JMJD2A (jumonji domaincontaining protein 2A). The selective inhibition of the nuclear pool of PP1 in forebrain neurons in transgenic mice is shown to induce several histone PTMs that include not only phosphorylation but also acetylation and methylation. These PTMs are residue-specific and occur at the promoter of genes important for memory formation like CREB (cAMP response element-binding protein) and NF-B (nuclear factor-B). These histone PTMs further co-occur with selective binding of RNA polymerase II and altered gene transcription, and are associated with improved long-term memory for objects and space. Together, these findings reveal a novel mechanism for the epigenetic control of gene transcription and long-term memory in the adult brain that depends on PP1.