AimsTo determine clinical outcomes and explore prognostic factors related to ulcer healing in people with a clinically infected diabetic foot ulcer.MethodsThis multicentre, prospective, observational study reviewed participants’ data at 12 months after culture of a diabetic foot ulcer requiring antibiotic therapy. From participants’ notes, we obtained information on the incidence of wound healing, ulcer recurrence, lower extremity amputation, lower extremity revascularization and death. We estimated the cumulative incidence of healing at 6 and 12 months, adjusted for lower extremity amputation and death using a competing risk analysis, and explored the relationship between baseline factors and healing incidence.ResultsIn the first year after culture of the index ulcer, 45/299 participants (15.1%) had died. The ulcer had healed in 136 participants (45.5%), but recurred in 13 (9.6%). An ipsilateral lower extremity amputation was recorded in 52 (17.4%) and revascularization surgery in 18 participants (6.0%). Participants with an ulcer present for ~2 months or more had a lower incidence of healing (hazard ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.77), as did those with a PEDIS (perfusion, extent, depth, infection, sensation) perfusion grade of ≥2 (hazard ratio 0.37, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.55). Participants with a single ulcer on their index foot had a higher incidence of healing than those with multiple ulcers (hazard ratio 1.90, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.06).ConclusionsClinical outcomes at 12 months for people with an infected diabetic foot ulcer are generally poor. Our data confirm the adverse prognostic effect of limb ischaemia, longer ulcer duration and the presence of multiple ulcers.

The ryanodine receptor of cardiac muscle performs a central role in excitation-contraction coupling. Phosphorylation of the channel on serine 2809 (in rabbit or the corresponding serine 2808 in man) alters function in vitro, although the impact of this in vivo has not been established. We have produced a pair of antisera to the serine 2809 phosphorylation site to aid description of the incidence and consequence of phosphorylation of this receptor. One of these antisera is specific for the serine 2809 phosphorylated form of the cardiac ryanodine receptor; the other antiserum is specific for the serine 2809 dephosphorylated receptor. These antibodies have been used to demonstrate that both protein kinase A and calmodulin-dependent kinase II are capable of phosphorylating serine 2809 in vitro. Both kinases phosphorylate serine 2809 to full stoichiometry, but this is accompanied by the incorporation of more (radioactive) phosphate into the receptor by calmodulin-dependent kinase II than by protein kinase A. These data suggest that calmodulin-dependent kinase II phosphorylates at least four sites in addition to serine 2809 in vitro.The ryanodine receptor (RYR2) of cardiac muscle plays a central role in the coupling of electrical excitation of the muscle to mechanical contraction. It is a Ca 2ϩ channel, which resides primarily in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) 1 at junctions between this organelle and the t-tubular system (a specialized invaginated domain of the plasma membrane). Upon depolarization of the plasma membrane, Ca 2ϩ enters the cell across the t-tubule membrane and interacts with the RYR2. Ca 2ϩ binding to RYR2 opens the channel, and Ca 2ϩ stored in the SR moves through the channel into the cytosol to initiate contraction (1).A variety of strategies are used by the cell to regulate RYR2 channel activity. It is anticipated that these regulatory strategies facilitate the fine control of E-C coupling, although evidence for this in live cells is rather limited. In vitro studies have shown that the binding of Ca 2ϩ (2), Mg 2ϩ (3), ATP (4), cADP ribose (5), calmodulin (6), and FKBP12.6 (7) affect channel activity, as does the binding of pharmacological agents such as the plant alkaloid ryanodine (which was originally used to identify the channel protein; Ref. 8). In addition the channel is phosphorylated on at least a single residue, and this phosphorylation alters channel behavior in vitro (7,9).In an effort to understand the regulatory role of RYR2 phosphorylation, research has focused on three aspects of the process. First, the identity of sites of phosphorylation in the receptor and kinases capable of using these sites; second, the functional consequence of site-specific phosphorylation in vitro; and third, the incidence and functional consequence of sitespecific phosphorylation of the receptor in living cells. To date Ser-2809 (in the rabbit sequence (10) or the corresponding Ser-2808 in man (11)) has been identified as a site of phosphorylation on RYR2, which is used in vitro (7,9). It has a counterpart in...

No abstract

ObjectiveTo determine the extent of agreement and patterns of disagreement between wound swab and tissue samples in patients with an infected diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).DesignMulticentre, prospective, cross-sectional study.SettingPrimary and secondary care foot ulcer/diabetic outpatient clinics and hospital wards across England.ParticipantsInclusion criteria: consenting patients aged ≥18 years; diabetes mellitus; suspected infected DFU. Exclusion criteria: clinically inappropriate to take either sample.InterventionsWound swab obtained using Levine’s technique; tissue samples collected using a sterile dermal curette or scalpel.Outcome measuresCoprimary: reported presence, and number, of pathogens per sample; prevalence of resistance to antimicrobials among likely pathogens. Secondary: recommended change in antibiotic therapy based on blinded clinical review; adverse events; sampling costs.Results400 consenting patients (79% male) from 25 centres.Most prevalent reported pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (43.8%), Streptococcus (16.7%) and other aerobic Gram-positive cocci (70.6%). At least one potential pathogen was reported from 70.1% of wound swab and 86.1% of tissue samples. Pathogen results differed between sampling methods in 58% of patients, with more pathogens and fewer contaminants reported from tissue specimens.The majority of pathogens were reported significantly more frequently in tissue than wound swab samples (P<0.01), with equal disagreement for S. aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Blinded clinicians more often recommended a change in antibiotic regimen based on tissue compared with wound swab results (increase of 8.9%, 95% CI 2.65% to 15.3%). Ulcer pain and bleeding occurred more often after tissue collection versus wound swabs (pain: 9.3%, 1.3%; bleeding: 6.8%, 1.5%, respectively).ConclusionReports of tissue samples more frequently identified pathogens, and less frequently identified non-pathogens compared with wound swab samples. Blinded clinicians more often recommended changes in antibiotic therapy based on tissue compared with wound swab specimens. Further research is needed to determine the effect of the additional information provided by tissue samples.Trial registration numberISRCTN52608451.

BackgroundPressure ulcers represent a major burden to patients, carers and the healthcare system, affecting approximately 1 in 17 hospital and 1 in 20 community patients. They impact greatly on an individual’s functional status and health-related quality of life. The mainstay of pressure ulcer prevention practice is the provision of pressure redistribution support surfaces and patient repositioning. The aim of the PRESSURE 2 study is to compare the two main mattress types utilised within the NHS: high-specification foam and alternating pressure mattresses, in the prevention of pressure ulcers.Methods/DesignPRESSURE 2 is a multicentre, open-label, randomised, double triangular, group sequential, parallel group trial. A maximum of 2954 ‘high-risk’ patients with evidence of acute illness will be randomised on a 1:1 basis to receive either a high-specification foam mattress or alternating-pressure mattress in conjunction with an electric profiling bed frame. The primary objective of the trial is to compare mattresses in terms of the time to developing a new Category 2 or above pressure ulcer by 30 days post end of treatment phase. Secondary endpoints include time to developing new Category 1 and 3 or above pressure ulcers, time to healing of pre-existing Category 2 pressure ulcers, health-related quality of life, cost-effectiveness, incidence of mattress change and safety. Validation objectives are to determine the responsiveness of the Pressure Ulcer Quality of Life-Prevention instrument and the feasibility of having a blinded endpoint assessment using photography. The trial will have a maximum of three planned analyses with unequally spaced reviews at event-driven coherent cut-points. The futility boundaries are constructed as non-binding to allow a decision for stopping early to be overruled by the Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee.DiscussionThe double triangular, group sequential design of the PRESSURE 2 trial will provide an efficient design through the possibility of early stopping for demonstrating either superiority, inferiority of mattresses or futility of the trial. The trial optimises the potential for producing robust clinical evidence on the effectiveness of two commonly used mattresses in clinical practice earlier than in a conventional design.Trial registration ISRCTN01151335. Registered on 14 May 2013. Protocol version: 5.0, dated 25 September 2015Trial sponsor: Clare Skinner, Faculty Head of Research Support, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT; 0113 343 4897; C.E.Skinner@leeds.ac.uk.

BackgroundThere is inadequate evidence to advise clinicians on the relative merits of swabbing versus tissue sampling of infected diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).ObjectivesTo determine (1) concordance between culture results from wound swabs and tissue samples from the same ulcer; (2) whether or not differences in bacterial profiles from swabs and tissue samples are clinically relevant; (3) concordance between results from conventional culture versus polymerase chain reaction (PCR); and (4) prognosis for patients with an infected DFU at 12 months’ follow-up.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional, multicentre study involving patients with diabetes and a foot ulcer that was deemed to be infected by their clinician. Microbiology specimens for culture were taken contemporaneously by swab and by tissue sampling from the same wound. In a substudy, specimens were also processed by PCR. A virtual ‘blinded’ clinical review compared the appropriateness of patients’ initial antibiotic regimens based on the results of swab and tissue specimens. Patients’ case notes were reviewed at 12 months to assess prognosis.ResultsThe main study recruited 400 patients, with 247 patients in the clinical review. There were 12 patients in the PCR study and 299 patients in the prognosis study. Patients’ median age was 63 years (range 26–99 years), their diabetes duration was 15 years (range 2 weeks–57 years), and their index ulcer duration was 1.8 months (range 3 days–12 years). Half of the ulcers were neuropathic and the remainder were ischaemic/neuroischaemic. Tissue results reported more than one pathogen in significantly more specimens than swabs {86.1% vs. 70.1% of patients, 15.9% difference [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.8% to 20.1%], McNemar’sp-value < 0.0001}. The two sampling techniques reported a difference in the identity of pathogens for 58% of patients. The number of pathogens differed in 50.4% of patients. In the clinical review study, clinicians agreed on the need for a change in therapy for 73.3% of patients (considering swab and tissue results separately), but significantly more tissue than swab samples required a change in therapy. Compared with traditional culture, the PCR technique reported additional pathogens for both swab and tissue samples in six (50%) patients and reported the same pathogens in four (33.3%) patients and different pathogens in two (16.7%) patients. The estimated healing rate was 44.5% (95% CI 38.9% to 50.1%). At 12 months post sampling, 45 (15.1%) patients had died, 52 (17.4%) patients had a lower-extremity ipsilateral amputation and 18 (6.0%) patients had revascularisation surgery.LimitationsWe did not investigate the potential impact of microbiological information on care. We cannot determine if the improved information yield from tissue sampling is attributable to sample collection, sample handling, processing or reporting.ConclusionsTissue sampling reported both more pathogens and more organisms overall than swabbing. Both techniques missed some organisms, with tissue sampling missing fewer than swabbing. Results from tissue sampling more frequently led to a (virtual) recommended change in therapy. Long-term prognosis for patients with an infected foot ulcer was poor.Future workResearch is needed to determine the effect of sampling/processing techniques on clinical outcomes and antibiotic stewardship.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

We investigated the effects of a protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor, H-89 {N-[2-(p-bromocinnamylamino)ethyl]-5-iso-quinolinesulphonamide}, on Ca2+ regulation in Fura-2-loaded ferret myocytes. H-89 (10 micromol/l) decreased the amplitude of the Fura-2 transient to 28. 2+/-4.3% (P<0.001) of control and prolonged its duration, characterized by a decrease in the rate of decline of Ca2+ to diastolic levels: t1/2 increased from 311+/-35 ms to 547+/-43 ms (P<0.001, n=7). Reduced Ca2+ uptake by the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) in the presence of H-89 was also indicated by a decrease in the SR Ca2+ content, as assessed with caffeine. The apparent slowing of the SR Ca2+-ATPase was not caused by changes in phosphorylation of phospholamban (PLB). However, Ca2+ uptake in microsomal vesicles prepared from canine hearts and fast-twitch rat skeletal muscle (which lacks PLB) was decreased by 34.1 and 46.8% (n=3), respectively, suggesting that H-89 has a direct inhibitory effect on the SR Ca2+-ATPase. In electrophysiological experiments, 5.0 micromol/l H-89 decreased the L-type Ca2+ current (ICa) by 39.5% (n=6) and slowed the upstroke of the action potential and, in some cases, caused loss of excitability without changes in the resting membrane potential. In summary, data show that [Ca2+ ]i regulation, and hence contraction, is sustained by PKA-mediated phosphorylation, even in the absence of beta-agonists. However, the use of H-89 as a tool to study the role of this signalling pathway is limited by the non-specific effects of H-89 on the SR Ca2+-ATPase.

IntroductionAccurate identification of pathogens, rather than colonising bacteria, is a prerequisite for targeted antibiotic therapy to ensure optimal patient outcome in wounds, such as diabetic foot ulcers. Wound swabs are the easiest and most commonly used sampling technique but most published guidelines recommend instead removal of a tissue sample from the wound bed, which is a more complex process. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance between culture results from wound swabs and tissue samples in patients with suspected diabetic foot infection.Methods and analysisPatients with a diabetic foot ulcer that is thought to be infected are being recruited from 25 sites across England in a cross-sectional study. The coprimary endpoints for the study are agreement between the two sampling techniques for three microbiological parameters: reported presence of likely isolates identified by the UK Health Protection Agency; resistance of isolates to usual antibiotic agents; and, the number of isolates reported per specimen. Secondary endpoints include appropriateness of the empiric antibiotic therapy prescribed and adverse events. Enrolling 400 patients will provide 80% power to detect a difference of 3% in the reported presence of an organism, assuming organism prevalence of 10%, discordance of 5% and a two-sided test at the 5% level of significance. Assumed overall prevalence is based on relatively uncommon organisms such as Pseudomonas. We will define acceptable agreement as κ>0.6.Ethics and disseminationConcordance in diabetic foot ulcer infection (CODIFI) will produce robust data to evaluate the two most commonly used sampling techniques employed for patients with a diabetic foot infection. This will help determine whether or not it is important that clinicians take tissue samples rather than swabs in infected ulcers. This study has been approved by the Sheffield NRES Committee (Ref: 11/YH/0078) and all sites have obtained local approvals prior starting recruitment.Study registrationNRES Ref: 11/YH/0078, UKCRN ID: 10440, ISRCTN: 52608451