Checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) is an integral component of the cell cycle as well as the DNA Damage Response (DDR) pathway. Previous work has demonstrated the effectiveness of inhibiting CHK1 with small-molecule inhibitors, but the role of CHK1 mediated DDR in medulloblastoma is unknown. CHK1, both at the mRNA and protein level, is highly expressed in medulloblastoma and elevated CHK1 expression in Group3 medulloblastoma is an adverse prognostic marker. CHK1 inhibition with the small-molecule drug AZD7762, results in decreased cell growth, increased DNA damage and cell apoptosis. Furthermore, AZD7762 acts in synergy with cisplatin in reducing cell proliferation in medulloblastoma. Similar phenotypic changes were observed with another CHK1 inhibitor, PF477736, as well as genetic knockdown using siRNA against CHK1. Treatments with small-molecule inhibitors of CHK1 profoundly modulated the expression of both upstream and downstream target proteins within the CHK1 signaling pathways. This suggests the presence of a feedback loop in activating CHK1. Overall, our results demonstrate that small-molecule inhibition of CHK1 in combination with, cisplatin, is more advantageous than either treatment alone, especially for Group 3 medulloblastoma, and therefore this combined therapeutic approach serves as an avenue for further investigation.
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of preoperative locoregional cytokine therapy (IRX-2 regimen) in early-stage breast cancer, and to evaluate for intratumoral and peripheral immunomodulatory activity.Patients and Methods: Sixteen patients with stage I-III earlystage breast cancer (any histology type) indicated for surgical lumpectomy or mastectomy were enrolled to receive preoperative locoregional immunotherapy with the IRX-2 cytokine biological (2 mL subcutaneous  10 days to periareolar skin). The regimen also included single-dose cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m 2 ) on day 1 to deplete T-regulatory cells and oral indomethacin to modulate suppressive myeloid subpopulations. The primary objective was to evaluate feasibility (i.e., receipt of therapy without surgical delays or grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events). The secondary objective was to evaluate changes in stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte score. The exploratory objective was to identify candidate pharmacodynamic changes for future study using a variety of assays, including flow cytometry, RNA and T-cell receptor DNA sequencing, and multispectral immunofluorescence.Results: Preoperative locoregional cytokine administration was feasible in 100% (n ¼ 16/16) of subjects and associated with increases in stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (P < 0.001). Programmed death ligand 1 (CD274) was upregulated at the RNA (P < 0.01) and protein level [by Ventana PD-L1 (SP142) and immunofluorescence]. Other immunomodulatory effects included upregulation of RNA signatures of T-cell activation and recruitment and cyclophosphamide-related peripheral T-regulatory cell depletion.Conclusions: IRX-2 is safe in early-stage breast cancer. Potentially favorable immunomodulatory changes were observed, supporting further study of IRX-2 in early-stage breast cancer and other malignancies.
e14149 Background: Multiple therapeutic components in IRX-2 including IL-2, IL-1, IFN-γ, TNFα, IL-6, GM-CSF, and IL-8 work synergistically to activate various immune cells including T cells, dendritic cells, and natural killer cells to recognize and kill tumors. Previous Phase 1 and Phase 2a clinical trials in head and neck cancer with IRX-2 have shown a benign safety profile. Immunologically stimulating host immunity using IRX-2, while simultaneously blocking PD-1/PD-L1-mediated immune suppression, may have the potential to enhance the outcome of current immunotherapy using IRX-2 alone. Methods: Healthy C3H mice were inoculated with SCC7 murine head and neck cancer cells. Fourteen days after inoculation, the tumor-bearing mice were treated with subcutaneous injection of IRX-2 once a week for 3 weeks, followed with anti-mPD-L1(i.p.) injection after each IRX-2 administration. Tumor size and survival were monitored for the therapeutic efficacy evaluation. Two weeks after the last IRX-2 administration, all mice were sacrificed and spleen, blood and residual tumor samples were harvested for immune function assays. Results: High levels of PD-L1 were expressed on SCC7 cell line and fresh tumors. The FCM data suggested that PD-L1 was preferentially expressed on the ALDHhigh SCC7 cancer stem cells. IRX-2 alone significantly inhibited SCC7 tumor growth, and the anti-tumor efficacy of IRX-2 was significantly enhanced by anti-mPD-L1 injection in a dose dependent manner in the immunocompetent hosts. Serum IgG from animals subjected to IRX-2 plus anti-mPD-L1 treatment mediated significantly (p < 0.05) higher cytotoxicity on SCC7 cells via ADCC than the IgG from animals treated with IRX-2 alone. CD8+ lymphocytes isolated from purified, activated and expanded CD3+ splenic T cells harvested from the animals subjected to IRX-2+anti-mPD-L1 treatment mediated significantly (p < 0.05) higher cytotoxicity than those subjected to IRX-2 or anti-PD-L1 mono-therapy against SCC7 tumor cells. Conclusions: Co-administration of IRX-2 and anti-PD-L1 promoted more powerful antitumor immunity with both B cell and T cell modulation. The combination treatment increased the specific IgG production that could kill tumor cells via ADCC, and enhanced the T cell CTL activity. Therefore, IRX-2 therapy plus anti-PD-L1 administration may represent a promising novel strategy to treat cancer patients.
BackgroundMarrow infiltrating lymphocytes (MILsTM) are the product of activating and expanding bone marrow T cells.1 The bone marrow is a specialized niche in the immune system enriched for antigen-experienced, memory T cells. In patients with multiple myeloma and other hematological malignancies that relapse post-transplant, MILs have been shown to contain tumor antigen-specific T cells and adoptive cell therapy (ACT) using MILs has demonstrated antitumor activity.2 3 The bone marrow has been shown to harbor tumor-antigen specific T cells in patients with melanoma,4 5 glioblastoma,6 breast,7 non-small-cell lung8 and pancreatic cancers.9 Here, we sought to determine if tumor-specific MILs could be expanded from the bone marrow of patients with a range of different solid tumors.MethodsBone marrow and blood samples were collected from patients with advanced and metastatic cancers. To date, samples have been collected from a minimum of four patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), prostate cancer, head and neck cancer, glioblastoma, and breast cancer. Samples from patients with multiple myeloma were used as a reference control. Utilizing a 10-day proprietary process, MILs and peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) were activated and expanded from patient bone marrow and blood samples, respectively. T cell lineage-specific markers (CD3, CD4 and CD8) were characterized by flow cytometry pre- and post-expansion.Tumor-specific T cells were quantitated in expanded MILs and PBLs using a previously described cytokine-secretion assay [2]. Briefly, autologous antigen-presenting cells (APCs) were pulsed with lysates from allogeneic cancer cell lines and co-cultured with activated MILs or PBLs. APCs pulsed with irrelevant mis-matched cancer cell line lysates or media alone were used as negative controls. Tumor-specific T cells were defined as the IFNgamma-producing population by flow cytometry.ResultsMILs were successfully expanded from all patient bone marrow samples tested, regardless of tumor type. Cytokine-producing tumor-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were detected in each of the expanded MILs. In contrast, tumor-specific T cells were not detected in any of the matched activated and expanded PBLs.ConclusionsMILs have been successfully grown for all solid tumor types evaluated, including NSCLC, prostate, head and neck, glioblastoma and breast cancer. Clinical studies have been completed in patients with multiple myeloma and other hematological cancers. 2 3 A phase IIa trial to evaluate MILs in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor is underway in patients with anti-PD1/PDL1-refractory NSCLC (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04069936). The preclinical data presented herein demonstrate that expanding MILs is feasible. MILs-based therapies hold therapeutic promise across a wide range of tumor indications.Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by each participating instituion’s IRB.ReferencesBorrello I and Noonan KA. Marrow-Infiltrating Lymphocytes - Role in Biology and Cancer Therapy. Front Immunol 2016 March 30; 7(112)Noonan KA, Huff CA, Davis J, et al. Adoptive transfer of activated marrow-infiltrating lymphocytes induces measurable antitumor immunity in the bone marrow in multiple myeloma. Sci. Transl. Med 2015;7:288ra78.Biavati L, Noonan K, Luznik L, Borrello I. Activated allogeneic donor-derived marrow-infiltrating lymphocytes display measurable in vitro antitumor activity. J Immunother 2019 Apr;42(3):73–80.Müller-Berghaus J, Ehlert K, Ugurel S, et al. Melanoma-reactive T cells in the bone marrow of melanoma patients: association with disease stage and disease duration. Cancer Res 2006;66(12):5997–6001.Letsch A, Keilholz U, Assfalg G, et al., Bone marrow contains melanoma-reactive CD8+ effector T Cells and, compared with peripheral blood, enriched numbers of melanoma-reactive CD8+ memory T cells. Cancer Res 2003 Sep 1;63(17):5582–5586.Chongsathidkiet P, Jackson C, Koyama S, et al., Sequestration of T cells in bone marrow in the setting of glioblastoma and other intracranial tumors. Nature Medicine 2018 Aug 13; 24:1459–1468.Feuerer M, Rocha M, Bai L, et al. Enrichment of memory T cells and other profound immunological changes in the bone marrow from untreated breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer 2001; 92(1):96–105.Safi S, Yamauchi Y, Stamova S, et al. Bone marrow expands the repertoire of functional T cells targeting tumor-associated antigens in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncoimmunology 2019;8(12):e1671762.Schmitz-Winnenthal FH, Volk C, Z’Graggen K, et al. High frequencies of functional tumor-reactive T cells in bone marrow and blood of pancreatic cancer patients. Cancer Res 2005;65(21):10079–87.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.