The cemetery at Świbie (site 16), in the district of Gliwice, Upper Silesia (southern Poland), is a large biritual necropolis associated with communities collectively known as the Upper Silesia-Lesser Poland group (Pl.: grupa górnośląsko-małopolska) of the Lusatian culture, which developed in this area and in western Lesser Poland from the Late Bronze Age. This regional grouping stands out among other Central European groups of the Urnfield culture by the prevalence of the inhumation rite. The site itself is located about 2 km north of the buildings of the village of Świbie, on the eastern side of a dirt road, on the top and southern slope of a small sandy dune. While the site was discovered in 1936 and the initial excavations were carried out at that time, the main archaeological research was carried out by archaeologists from the Museum in Gliwice, Anna Stankiewicz-Węgrzykowa and Halina Wojciechowska, from 1961 to 1992. As a result, an extensive cemetery was uncovered, occupying an area of approximately 55 acres, in which, following a reinterpretation of the sources, 548 archaeological features were identified, including 420 inhumation graves, 28 biritual graves (inhumation graves with cremation burials) and 100 cremation graves (including 49 urned cremations, 50 cremations in pits and one urn-pit grave). Prior to the establishment of the large early Iron Age biritual cemetery at Świbie, the area had been used repeatedly by Stone Age and aarly Bronze Age communities. The few ceramic remains discovered in the southern zone of the necropolis have been classified as Nemun culture (Neolithic of the forest zone), Corded Ware culture, and Mierzanowice culture. The late Stone Age and early Bronze Age materials discovered at Świbie, although few in number and poorly preserved, document a trend in the development of communities living in the forest zone that is quite rare in Silesia. These groupings were largely an ‚alternative’ world to the ‚classical’ Neolithic societies. They grew out of traditions different from those of communities sharing the Anatolian-Balkan model of the Neolithic, and formed primarily on the basis of early Holocene Mesolithic traditions.
By applying the seriation method to a group of 129 assemblages distinguished by a ‘non-male’ model of grave furnishing and containing at least two distinctive metal objects, it was possible to divide the lifespan of the cemetery into three chronological stages. These were characterised by stylistically different (but interlocking) sets of ornaments and dress items. An attempt to relate these phases to the periodisation systems developed for the areas to the north, west, and south confirmed contacts with the Oder zone as early as during the early phase, which we synchronise with Ha C1b. What has also emerged in the course of the present study is another factor characteristic of this early phase, one that has not been taken into account in previous studies, namely the evidence of contacts with the northern lowland zone. These are legible mainly in the distinctive style of neck and hand ornaments: necklaces of the Wendelringe or unidirectionally twisted type, with loops or fastened with a hook, usually occurring no further south than Greater Poland, and bracelets with distant Pomeranian references. The presence of this style seems to have contributed in subsequent phases to the production of local types of ring ornaments (e.g., pointed necklaces of the Mąkolice type). The presence of northern bronzes of possibly such an early chronology (Ha C1) in the Polish Plain, especially at its southern edge, has so far been only sporadically reported, especially in the range of the Upper Silesian-Lesser Poland group. Nevertheless, contacts with the north at the turn of the Bronze Age and early Iron Age have already been suggested in the context of the northwards ‘diffusion’ of the idea of inhumation. early phase reveal strong influences coming evidently from the south, from the Moravian Gate region. This is indicated by the appearance of bracelets with thickened ends (e.g., Kietrz type) or richly decorated necklaces fastened with a hook (Domasław type) in many graves of this phase. The exact temporal relationship between the two groups of finds is difficult to determine – they appear inseparable on the seriation diagram (Figs. 4.1–2), with the Silesian Hallstatt style continuing much longer, into the middle phase. In addition, the early phase provides evidence that the Świbie community had access to very valuable goods from southern Europe, such as beads made of vitreous materials (glass and glassy faience, still scarce at the time) or flat iron axes with broad heads (Ärmchenbeile of type III3). It is with this phase that the most impressive burial in Świbie, grave 102, is connected. It belonged to a woman furnished with a local button diadem and the largest set of imports in the cemetery, comprising of a glass bead necklace with a unique ‘star’ shaped bead, a bronze harp fibula decorated with chains, a bronze necklace, and perhaps also bracelets (Garbacz-Klempka et al., Chapter 15). Another noteworthy burial from the early phase is grave 125, in which a dyed fabric of dense yarn, undoubtedly imported from eastern Alpine region, was found (Słomska-Bolonek, Antosik, Chapter 12). A phenomenon typical of the early phase is emphasising the status of some women (but from many families) by furnishing their burials not only with prestigious imports but also with sumptuous local ornaments. Among the latter, the most important markers of status and local identity (of traditional dress?) were headbands with sewn-on bronze (less often lead) buttons. In the burial ritual, the primacy of inhumation is evident. This means that an exclusively local population substrate, cultivating traditions derived from previous eras, continued to play significant role, while the role of exogamy was perhaps still limited. Most likely before the end of the early phase, and certainly in the middle phase (Ha C2), we observe a gradual disappearance of northern stylistic inspiration in ornament making. Meanwhile, permanent contacts with the strongly Hallstattized communities from the right-bank Upper Silesia and Central Silesia continued, noticeable mainly in the spectrum of ornaments. Some references to the necropolis at Domasław are evident (decorated necklaces, painted pottery), but there are also clear differences, including the lack of adoption of costume fastened with a brooch or brooches (Fibeltracht) and the absence of aristocratic burials furnished with swords. There are also no direct parallels in Świbie for sumptuous tomb constructions (chambered graves), although this may be due to the well- established local traditions of lining the bottoms of graves with wood, building grave boxes, or using coffins. The increasing occurrence of cremation, sometimes as burials added to earlier inhumation graves (resulting in ‘biritual graves’), may be seen as an expression of the increasing openness of the local population to external influences or as a move away from endogamy. All these phenomena become more pronounced in the late phase, which we synchronise with the developed Ha C2 and Ha D1. From this stage come most of the glass beads found in Świbie. This applies to both complete necklaces and beads placed to graves in smaller numbers, and the number of burials furnished with such beads is higher than in the early phase. Silesian painted vessels, essentially absent in the early phase, now appear in more than a dozen graves, both with and without indicators of high status (Chapter 5). Most of the graves with amber come from this phase. The growing frequency of these middle-class imports is indicative of increasing egalitarianism, which is also reflected by the insignificant proportion of late phase assemblages among the richest grave furnishings in the ranking developed for the cemetery as a whole (Fig. 5.2). This was not due to the disappearance of local ways of prestige signalling – traditional headbands (diadems), for example, are still present, and are even richer (up to 140 buttons). At the same time, from the late phase onwards, all locally manufactured types of ornaments (necklaces, pins, bracelets, ankle-rings) are basically made of iron. Morphologically, these are familiar types, but the raw material from which they are made gradually changes during the middle phase. The change in raw material is often accompanied by a simplification of the original patterns. Given all the evidence for long-distance networks becoming increasingly accessible for a growing proportion of the local community, the rise in popularity of cremation, evident in the late phase and especially towards the end of cemetery’s lifespan, should come as no surprise (Fig. 6.1), as this phenomenon remains, in our view, linked to the growing role of exogamy in marital exchange. The natural and increasingly important partners in this exchange were the Silesian populations, who were also the providers of the above-mentioned goods, and who had for centuries been traditionally following cremation as their burial rite. The most recent burials deposited at Świbie are cremation burials in large pots as urns, such as grave 486 with an iron belt clasp, dated to the turn of the Ha D1/D2 period, deposited on the northern edge of the necropolis.
The most common form of furnishing in the inhumation graves was pottery, which was found in 289 features. Vessels were deposited in two sets. One was placed next to the burial, customarily in the northern part behind the head of the deceased, less frequently in other parts of the grave. The other set of vessels was placed at the level of the pit ceiling, among the stones of the pavement or between its successive layers. The sets differ in both number and the choice of ceramic forms. The vessels by the burial are the classic ‘Upper Silesian set’, consisting of a pot, a bowl and a scoop, and there was often more than one such set. The sets placed higher in the pit are dominated by large vase-shaped vessels, plates, and the classic pot, bowl and scoop sets. Inhumation graves from the Świbie cemetery are marked by a significant saturation in metal artefacts, made of bronze (215 graves), iron (166 graves) and, less frequently, lead (seven graves). In this respect, Świbie is unique among the other necropolises of the Upper Silesia-Lesser Poland group. The assortment of metal objects includes ornaments and dress items, as well as tools and weapons. The raw material criterion must have also played a role in their selection as grave gifts, as ornaments were made of both bronze and iron (especially in the younger phase), while tools were exclusively made of iron. The deceased were buried in full ceremonial dress, and the sets of ornaments and parts of the dress preserved at inhumation burials enable its reconstruction. One distinctive element, even a hallmark of the Upper Silesia-Lesser Poland group, is the head ornaments, often of elaborate forms. Remnants of headbands (plaited or textile) were identified in the cemetery, to which spirals (called temple rings) were attached on the side, or additionally rows of bronze buttons were sewn on. The buttons were placed above the forehead (half-diadems) or all around (diadems). Other small bronze appliqués (salta leone beads or glass and amber beads) were sometimes also attached to the headbands. Diadems/bands made with lead elements, uncovered in six graves, are rare finds. Necklaces made usually of bronze, less often of iron, and necklaces of glass and glassy faience beads were strung around the neck. On the chest, the deceased had bronze and iron pins with differently shaped heads (which may have fastened the robe or adorned it). Bracelets were placed around the wrists, and ankle-rings around the ankles. The deceased were buried with tools: iron knives, sickles, axes (flat or socketed) and stone battle axes, and occasionally also items of weaponry, such as iron spearheads or bronze arrowheads.
For years, the Hallstatt period necropolis at Świbie, north of Gliwice (S Poland), has been mentioned on a par with such Early Iron Age sites as Kietrz, Domasław, Wicina and Biskupin. This eminent sepulchral site was surveyed in its entirety between 1961 and 1992, thanks to the commitment of Gliwice archaeologists Anna Stankiewicz-Węgrzykowa and Halina Wojciechowska. On the 30th anniversary of the completion of the field research, the researchers’ home institution, the Museum in Gliwice, together with the Profil-Archeo Publishing House, published a two-volume monograph devoted to the site. The first volume is a catalogue of 548 graves and archaeological finds, with more than 350 plates with drawings of the grave plans and artefacts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.