Purpose: To assess the prevalence of defective homologous recombination (HR)-based DNA repair in sporadic primary breast cancers, examine the clincopathologic features that correlate with defective HR and the relationship with neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.Experimental Design: We examined a cohort of 68 patients with sporadic primary breast cancer who received neoadjuvant anthracylcine-based chemotherapy, with core biopsies taken 24 hours after the first cycle of chemotherapy. We assessed RAD51 focus formation, a marker of HR competence, by immunofluorescence in postchemotherapy biopsies along with geminin as a marker of proliferative cells. We assessed the RAD51 score as the proportion of proliferative cells with RAD51 foci.Results: A low RAD51 score was present in 26% of cases (15/57, 95% CI: 15%-40%). Low RAD51 score correlated with high histologic grade (P ¼ 0.031) and high baseline Ki67 (P ¼ 0.005). Low RAD51 score was more frequent in triple-negative breast cancers than in ER-and/or HER2-positive breast cancer (67% vs. 19% respectively; P ¼ 0.0036). Low RAD51 score was strongly predictive of pathologic complete response (pathCR) to chemotherapy, with 33% low RAD51 score cancers achieving pathCR compared with 3% of other cancers (P ¼ 0.011).Conclusions: Our results suggest that defective HR, as indicated by low RAD51 score, may be one of the factors that underlie sensitivity to anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Defective HR is frequent in triple-negative breast cancer, but it is also present in a subset of other subtypes, identifying breast cancers that may benefit from therapies that target defective HR such as PARP inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res; 16(24); 6159-68. Ó2010 AACR.DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination (HR) is required for the repair of DNA damage arising from many currently used DNA-damaging chemotherapy agents (1), as well as DNA single-strand breaks that are generated by inhibitors of poly(ADP ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP; ref. 2). The tumor suppressor genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 encode proteins that are required for HR (3), and tumors arising in carriers of germline mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2 are defective in HR and, consequently, are highly sensitive to DNA-damaging chemotherapy (4, 5) and PARP inhibitors (6). Increasing evidence suggests that a proportion of sporadic breast cancers may also have defects in HR (1). Sporadic basallike breast cancers have low BRCA1 expression (7-9) and BRCA1 promoter methylation is found in approximately 10% of sporadic breast cancers including nonbasal tumors (7). Recently, it has also been proposed that loss of PTEN expression may also lead to a defect in HR (3,10,11).In this study, we set out to develop a functional assay for HR with the purpose of assessing the prevalence of a functional defect in HR in sporadic breast cancer and examine whether defective HR correlated with clinicopathologic features and sensitivity to chemotherapy. The protein RAD51 is a DNA recombinase and key component of HR (12). In response to DNA double-strand bre...

Contralateral breast cancer risk depends on age at first breast cancer and on the affected BRCA gene, and this risk should be considered in treatment planning.

Purpose: Digital PCR is a highly accurate method of determining DNA concentration. We adapted digital PCR to determine the presence of oncogenic amplification through noninvasive analysis of circulating free plasma DNA and exemplify this approach by developing a plasma DNA digital PCR assay for HER2 copy number.Experimental Design: The reference gene for copy number assessment was assessed experimentally and bioinformatically. Chromosome 17 pericentromeric probes were shown to be suboptimal, and EFTUD2 at chromosome position 17q21.31 was selected for analysis. Digital PCR assay parameters were determined on plasma samples from a development cohort of 65 patients and assessed in an independent validation cohort of plasma samples from 58 patients with metastatic breast cancer. The sequential probability ratio test was used to assign the plasma DNA digital PCR test as being HER2-positive or -negative in the validation cohort.Results: In the development cohort, the HER2:EFTUD2 plasma DNA copy number ratio had a receiver operator area under the curve (AUC) ¼ 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.86-0.99, P ¼ 0.0003]. In the independent validation cohort, 64% (7 of 11) of patients with HER2-amplified cancers were classified as plasma digital PCR HER2-positive and 94% (44 of 47) of patients with HER2-nonamplified cancers were classified as digital PCR HER2-negative, with a positive and negative predictive value of 70% and 92%, respectively.Conclusion: Analysis of plasma DNA with digital PCR has the potential to screen for the acquisition of HER2 amplification in metastatic breast cancer. This approach could potentially be adapted to the analysis of any locus amplified in cancer.

IntroductionWhile it has been reported that the risk of contralateral breast cancer in patients from BRCA1 or BRCA2 positive families is elevated, little is known about contralateral breast cancer risk in patients from high risk families that tested negative for BRCA1/2 mutations.MethodsA retrospective, multicenter cohort study was performed from 1996 to 2011 and comprised 6,235 women with unilateral breast cancer from 6,230 high risk families that had tested positive for BRCA1 (n = 1,154) or BRCA2 (n = 575) mutations or tested negative (n = 4,501). Cumulative contralateral breast cancer risks were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and were compared between groups using the log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was applied to assess the impact of the age at first breast cancer and the familial history stratified by mutation status.ResultsThe cumulative risk of contralateral breast cancer 25 years after first breast cancer was 44.1% (95%CI, 37.6% to 50.6%) for patients from BRCA1 positive families, 33.5% (95%CI, 22.4% to 44.7%) for patients from BRCA2 positive families and 17.2% (95%CI, 14.5% to 19.9%) for patients from families that tested negative for BRCA1/2 mutations. Younger age at first breast cancer was associated with a higher risk of contralateral breast cancer. For women who had their first breast cancer before the age of 40 years, the cumulative risk of contralateral breast cancer after 25 years was 55.1% for BRCA1, 38.4% for BRCA2, and 28.4% for patients from BRCA1/2 negative families. If the first breast cancer was diagnosed at the age of 50 or later, 25-year cumulative risks were 21.6% for BRCA1, 15.5% for BRCA2, and 12.9% for BRCA1/2 negative families.ConclusionsContralateral breast cancer risk in patients from high risk families that tested negative for BRCA1/2 mutations is similar to the risk in patients with sporadic breast cancer. Thus, the mutation status should guide decision making for contralateral mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Invasive lobular breast cancer (BC) is the second most common BC subtype. Prognostic parameters (tumor classification, lymph node status, histologic grade, Oncotype DX recurrence score [RS], progesterone receptor status, and Ki67 index) were retrospectively studied in a large, prospective clinical trial encompassing 2585 patients who had hormone receptor-positive early BC (the West German Study Group PlanB trial). METHODS: BCs were centrally reviewed and classified as lobular (n = 353; 14%) or nonlobular (n = 2232; 86%). The median follow-up was 60 months. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) estimates were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic parameters were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Lobular BC was associated with higher tumor classification, higher lymph node status, lower histologic grade, lower Ki67 index, and low or intermediate RS. The prevalence of high RS (RS range, 26-100) was 3-fold lower in patients who had lobular BC compared with those who had nonlobular BC (8% vs 24%; P < .001). However, 5-year DFS estimates for lobular and nonlobular BC were similar (92.1% and 92.3%, respectively; P = .673). In multivariate analyses, prognostic parameters for DFS in lobular BC included grade 3 (hazard ratio, 5.06; 95% CI, 1.91-13.39) and a pathologic lymph node status (pN) of pN3 (

503 Background: Optimal use of de-escalated, particularly chemotherapy(CT)-free, neoadjuvant regimens in HER2+ early breast cancer (EBC) is currently unclear as there are limited survival data so far. In ADAPT-HR-/HER2+, we previously showed an excellent pCR rate of 90% after 12-week neoadjuvant paclitaxel (Pac) +pertuzumab (P) +trastuzumab (T) and a substantial and clinically meaningful pCR rate of 34% after P+T alone in HR-/HER2+ EBC. Here, we present first survival data. Methods: The prospective multicenter WSG-ADAPT-HR-/HER2+ phase II-trial is part of the ADAPT-umbrella protocol. Patients with cT1-cT4c, cN0-3 HR-/HER2+ EBC (n = 134) were randomized to 4 cycles of P+T +/- pac d1,8,15 q3w. All tumors were HR-negative (ER and PR < 1%) and HER2-positive (central lab, i.e., 2+ FISH positive or 3+ by immunohistochemistry. Primary endpoint was pCR (ypT0/is/ypN0); omission of further CT was allowed in pts with pCR. Trial objective was to compare pCR in P+T+pac arm vs. early responders in P+T arm (defined as low cellularity and/or Ki67 decrease >30% after 3 weeks). The trial was stopped early due to the observed pCR superiority in the P+T+pac arm. Secondary endpoints included safety, 5-y (distant)-DFS, OS and translational research. Cox-regression analysis was applied. PAM50 subtype was assessed using the BC360 panel. Results: 134 patients were randomized to P+T (n = 92) or P+T+pac (n = 42). 60% of tumors were cT2-4, 42% clinically node-positive. After a median follow-up of 5 years, no significant differences between study arms were observed regarding DFS, dDFS, and OS; only 13 iDFS events (7 dDFS) were observed in the whole ITT population. pCR (vs. non-pCR) after the 12-week study treatment (irrespective of study arm) was strongly associated with improved iDFS (5y DFS 98.5% vs. 82%, HR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.64). Of the 69 patients with pCR, 39 (56.5%) received no further CT (P+T arm: n = 9, 29% vs. (P+T+pac arm n = 30, 79%); only 1 distant relapse (1.4%) was observed in these patients. In the CT-free P+T arm, no pCR was observed in patients with low HER2 expression (IHC 1+/2+ and FISH positive) and/or basal-like subtype by PAM50 (n = 17, 19%). In the total study population, low HER2 expression and/or no early response was strongly associated with worse dDFS (p =.029) and iDFS (p =.068). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: For the first time, we have shown both excellent pCR and survival in patients treated by de-escalated neoadjuvant CT+P+T irrespective of further CT use in a prospective multicenter study. Investigation of CT-free regimens may need to be focussed on selected patients only (e.g. with high HER2 expression/non-basal-like tumors). In ADAPT HR-/HER2+, early pCR after only 12 weeks of neoadjuvant P+T+pac was strongly associated with improved outcome and may thus serve as a predictive clinical marker for further treatment (de)-escalation. Clinical trial information: NCT01779206.

Invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common breast carcinoma (BC) subtype and is mainly driven by loss of E-cadherin expression. Correct classification of BC as ILC is important for patient treatment. This study assessed the degree of agreement among pathologists for the diagnosis of ILC. Two sets of hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative BCs were independently reviewed by participating pathologists. In set A (61 cases), participants were provided with hematoxylin/eosin (HE)-stained sections. In set B (62 cases), participants were provided with HE-stained sections and E-cadherin immunohistochemistry (IHC). Tumor characteristics were balanced. Participants classified specimens as non-lobular BC versus mixed BC versus ILC. Pairwise inter-observer agreement and agreement with a pre-defined reference diagnosis were determined with Cohen's kappa statistics. Subtype calls were correlated with molecular features, including CDH1/E-cadherin mutation status. Thirty-five pathologists completed both sets, providing 4,305 subtype calls. Pairwise inter-observer agreement was moderate in set A (median κ = 0.58, interquartile range [IQR]: 0.48-0.66) and substantial in set B (median κ = 0.75, IQR: 0.56-0.86, p < 0.001). Agreement with the reference diagnosis was substantial in set A (median κ = 0.67, IQR: 0.57-0.75) and almost perfect in set B (median κ = 0.86, IQR: 0.73-0.93, p < 0.001). The median frequency of CDH1/E-cadherin mutations in specimens classified as ILC was 65% in set A (IQR: 56-72%) and 73% in set B (IQR: 65-75%, p < 0.001). Cases with variable subtype calls included E-cadherin-positive ILCs harboring CDH1 missense mutations, and E-cadherin-negative ILCs with tubular elements and focal P-cadherin expression. ILCs with trabecular growth pattern were often misclassified as non-lobular BC in set A but not in set B. In conclusion, subtyping of BC as ILC achieves almost perfect agreement with a pre-defined reference standard, if assessment is supported by E-cadherin IHC. CDH1 missense mutations associated with preserved E-cadherin protein expression, E-to P-cadherin switching in ILC with tubular elements, and trabecular ILC were identified as potential sources of discordant classification.

Abstract. Non-steroidal nuclear receptors play a major role in breast cancer development. A correlation among, and possible prognostic function of, the members of the nuclear receptor superfamily has been discussed controversially over the years. Hence, we conducted a quantification of the different expression levels of the thyroid receptor (TR), retinoid X receptor (RXR), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) and vitamin D receptor (VDR) in malignant breast tumour tissue samples. Patients diagnosed and treated for breast cancer between 1990 and 2000 were included. Receptor expression was detected by immunohistochemical staining.