This is the first report on morphologically different strains of cyanobacteria: Arthrospira maxima, Nostoc cf-muscorum and Nodularia sphaerocarpa used for enantioselective bioreduction of selected, structurally different diethyl esters of oxophosphonic acids. The efficiency of the asymmetric hydrogen transfer was strongly dependent on the chemical structure of the substrates. Arthrospira maxima was active only toward diethyl (S)-2-oxopropylphosphonate (20% of yield, 99% of ee), whereas the application of Nostoc cf-muscorum as a biocatalyst allowed diethyl (S)-2-hydroxy-2-phenylethylphosphonate with a high enantiomeric excess (99%) and with 26% conversion degree to be obtained. Employing Nodularia sphaerocarpa led to the most spectacular result -diethyl (S)-2-hydroxy-2-phenylethylphosphonate with a degree of conversion of 99% and an optical purity of 92%. Enantioselective bioconversion of oxophosphonate with an aromatic side group located in the immediate vicinity of the carbonyl functionality was achieved for the first time. Additionally, flow cytometry showed excellent resistance of the cells of Nodularia sphaerocarpa against the examined xenobiotic -2-oxo-2-phenylethylphosphonate, these cells remain viable at the concentration of 10 mM of the bioconversion substrate compared to the 1 mM described previously for a fungal biocatalyst. The effect of cultivation medium, light source and light cycle (light : dark) on the effectiveness of the biotransformation process was examined.
This report, based on the previous studies, compares the reductive activity of different modes of following photobiocatalysts (on laboratory and preparative scale): Arthrospira maxima, Nostoc cf. muscorum and Nodularia sphaerocarpa, toward diethyl esters of 2-oxopropylphosphonate (1), 2-oxo-2-phenylethylphosphonate (2), and 2-oxobutylphosphonate (3). It was confirmed that immobilization in alginate matrix do not affect the activity and viability of the biocatalysts. Corresponding (S)-hydroxyphosphonates (1a-3a) were obtained with similar efficiency compared to the free-cell mode with the yield and of the optical purity e.e respectively (e.g., N. sphaerocarpa experiments): (1) yield: 21 %, e.e. 84 %; (2) yield 97 %, e.e. 97; (3) yield 21 %, e.e. 89 %. Scaling up the processes for the best biocatalyst, N. sphaerocarpa, indicated that the use of free-living cells of cyanobacteria is more effective (640 mg of substrate 2, 44 % of yield, 91 % of e.e.), compared to the column bioreactor packed with immobilized cells of this photobiocatalyst (384 mg of substrate 2, 38 % of yield, 86 % of e.e). In the case of free and immobilized cells of N. cf. muscorum, agitation of the medium was the crucial activity mediator. Shaking culture of free cells of N. cf. muscorum converted the diethyl 2-oxo-2-phenylethylphosphonate (2) with the yield of 43 % (99 % of e.e.) compared to 18 % (99 % of e.e., stationary culture). Immobilized cells of this cyanobacterium were also more active toward (2) under shaking conditions (28 % of yield, 99 % of e.e.) than free ones without agitation.
The influence of different cultivation conditions (medium, pH values, temperatures of the process, air access) on the ability of amino acid mineralization via oxidative deamination by Serratia marcescens (facultative anaerobic bacterial strain) was examined. Among 11 tested substrates -amino acids serine and proline, of both optical configurations, were chosen as model substrates for the determination of the acceptable range of the value of external factors influencing the mineralization process. Both pH and oxygen access were found to be limiting factors. While the acidic pH switched off the mineralization, restricted aeration significantly reduced the effectiveness of the process, extending the time for its completion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.