494 Several randomised pediatric trials have demonstrated that intensification of Asparaginase (ASP) treatment in ALL can contribute to improved outcome. In adult ALL few data are availabe and optimal ASP preparation, schedule and intensity with respect to efficacy and tolerability have to be defined. The optimisation of ASP treatment is therefore an essential aim of the GMALL. Treatment: Induction treatment of the ongoing study 07/2003 consists of dexamethasone, vincristine, daunorubicine, pegylated asparaginase (PEG-ASP) (phase I), mercaptopurine, cyclophosphamide and cytarabine (phase II) as previously described (Brueggemann et al, Blood 2006: 107; 1116). During the study the dose for PEG-ASP was increased from 1000 to 2000 U/m2 in induction and from 500 to 2000 U/m2 in consolidation (combined with HDMTX and MP) for pts aged between 15 and 55 years. 1 application for high risk and 7 applications for standard risk (SR) were scheduled during the first year and the aim was improvement of overall survival (OS) and remission duration (RD). Patients: From more than 100 centers in Germany 1226 pts with a median age of 35 (15-55) yrs were evaluable. 826 pts were treated with 1000 U/m2 (cohort 1) and 400 pts with 2000 U/m2 (cohort 2) and both groups were comparable regarding major entry criteria. The analysis was restricted to pts who received one of the scheduled PEG-ASP doses during induction. Outcome: CR rate after induction was 91% vs 91% in cohort 1 and 2 resp., with comparable rates for early death (4% vs 5%) and failure (5% vs 4%). Data on molecular response (MRD below 10−4) after induction are available in a subset and showed no difference between both cohorts after induction (79% vs 82%). OS after 3 years was improved in cohort 2 (60% vs 67%; p>.05). The positive effect was specifically evident in SR patients (N=407 vs 190) with respect to OS (68% vs 80%; p=.02) and RD (61% vs 74%; p=.02). It was demonstrated in younger pts (15-45 yrs) (71% vs 82%; p=.02) and older pt (45-55 yrs) (56% vs 74%; p>.05). Excellent results were achieved in young adults (15-25 years) with respect to OS (77% vs 86%; p>.05) and RD (60% vs 78%; p>.05). Toxicity: The analysis of toxicity was focused on grade III-IV events during induction with potential correlation to PEG-ASP (764/382 pts in cohort 1/cohort 2)). Incidences are as follows: GOT or GPT (30%/30%), bilirubine (10%/16%), thrombosis (5%/5%) and hypersensitivity (<1%/<1%). In a subset of pts additional AEs were assessed as amylase (5%/13%), lipase (23%/15%) and glucose (10%/12%). Significantly less toxicity was observed during consolidation cycles. Bilirubine °III/IV occurred median 16d after PEG-ASP during phase II of induction. In univariate analysis it was correlated to dose (10% vs 16%; p=.004), age <> 45 yrs (11% vs 17%; p=.005), BMI <> 30 (12% vs 18%; p=.04) and rituximab application (11% vs 18%; p=.009). Hepatomegaly, infections or imatinib application had no significant effect. In multivariate analysis dose and age remained independent significant prognostic factors. Bilirubine increase during induction was associated with treatment delays and inferior prognosis. Conclusions: This is the largest cohort of adult ALL treated with PEG-ASP. Due to prolonged activity fewer applications are required which is a pre-requisite for realisation of ASP intensification in the context of an intensive multidrug chemotherapy for adult ALL. Although CR rate and molecular CR were not significantly improved PEG-ASP intensification was associated with an improved OS and RD. The improvement was specifically evident in SR pts treated with up to 7 doses of PEG-ASP. Overall intensified PEG-ASP was feasible. The rate of grade III-IV bilirubine elevation increased after dose escalation and led to treatment delays in individual pts which were prognostically relevant. It would be an important goal to identify parameters to predict severe ASP related toxicity. Further intensification of ASP by additional applications would be of interest. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe 70–2657-Ho2 and partly BMBF 01GI 9971 and Medac GmbH. Disclosures: Goekbuget: Medac: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Hoelzer: Medac: Speakers Bureau.
1493 Few older ALL pts are entered into prospective trials and data on characteristics and outcome are scarce. The GMALL started a prospective trial in older ALL (>55 yrs) in 2003. In Ph-neg ALL a prephase (Dexa, Cyclo, MTX i.th.) was followed by induction I (Dexa, VCR, Idarubicin), induction II (Cyclo, AraC), alternating consolidation with IDMTX (d 1,15) ×3, VM26/AraC ×2, reinduction (VCR, Ida, Cyclo, AraC) and maintenance (MP, MTX) up to 2 yrs. In CD20+ ALL Rituximab ×8 was added. CNS-prophylaxis consisted of i.th. triple combination (MTX, AraC, Dexa) ×4 during induction, ×8 during consolidation/maintenance. The original protocol (group 1) was amended to optimize CNS prophylaxis and consolidation (group 2). I.th. therapy was then performed with liposomal cytarabine, 3x during induction, 3x during consolidation. IDMTX dose was increased from 500 to 1000 mg/m2 and native E.coli ASP (10.000 U/m2) was added on d2 and d16 of IDMTX. VM26/AraC was replaced by IDAraC (1000 mg/m2 d1,3,5). In a further amendment the original i.th. prophylaxis was reinserted until final analysis of liposomal AraC became available. Furthermore, after induction, one cycle with pegylated ASP (500 U/m2) (PEG-ASP) was scheduled to evaluate feasibility in older pts (group 3). Results of induction were compared for groups 1–3; outcome analysis was restricted to 1–2 due to still short follow-up for group 3. 268 pts with a median age of 67 (55–85) yrs treated in 94 hospitals were evaluable (180, 43 and 45 pts in groups 1, 2 and 3 resp.). 39% were aged 55–65 yrs, 51% 66–75 yrs and 10% above 75 yrs. 67% had c/pre-B-ALL, 18% pro-B-ALL and 15% T-ALL. WBC was >30/nL in 27%. Poor ECOG status (≥2) before (ECOGb) or after (ECOGa) onset of ALL was described in 7% or 38% resp. 78% had any comorbidity and 9% had a Charlson score (ChS) ≥3. No significant differences were detected between groups 1–3. Overall 76% (N=203) achieved CR after induction, 14% experienced early death (ED) and 10% did not achieve CR. In groups 1–3 CR rates were 72%, 86% and 82% resp. and ED rates 18%, 0% and 11% resp. (p=.03). CR rates were 84%, 74% and 52% in three age groups (p=.002) with ED rates of 7%, 14% and 37% resp. (p=.0004). Immunophenotype and WBC (<> 30.000) correlated with CR but not ED rate. ECOGb 0–1 vs ≥2 correlated with CR (82% vs 33%;p<.0001) and ED (7% vs 53%;p<.0001). Also ECOGa correlated with CR (85% vs 67%;p=.003) and ED (6% vs 19%;p=.003). CR and ED rates were not influenced by comorbidity itself but by ChS < vs ≥3: CR (78% vs 59%;p=.003) and ED (11% vs 33%;p=.0007). Multivariate analysis confirmed ECOGb, WBC and age for CR rate, and ECOGb, age and ChS for ED. Overall survival (OS) at 5 yrs was 23%; 33% at 2 yrs for group 1 and 52% for group 2 resp. (p=.01). Mortality in CR was 6% and 15% of the pts were withdrawn in CR. Probability of continuous complete remission (CCR) was 32% at 5 yrs, 42% and 43% at 2 yrs for group 1 and group 2 resp. (p=>.05). Age (42% vs 37% vs 8%;p=.0007), WBC (43% vs 15%;p<.0006), ECOGb (40% vs 14%;p=.0008) and ECOGa (42% vs 30%;p=.0023) were correlated with OS in contrast to comorbidity and ChS. Age, treatment group, WBC, ECOGb and ECOGa were confirmed in multivariate analysis. Pts younger than 75 yrs with ECOGb below 2 had an 86% CR rate with 10% ED and 36% OS at 3 yrs. WBC and MRD were significant prognostic factors for CCR. MRD results after consolidation I were available in 33 pts. CCR was 11% in molecular failure vs 68% in molecular CR. Preliminary results confirmed feasibility of PEG-ASP. With this age adapted regimen a favorable CR rate was achieved in a large patient group with a median age of 67 yrs. CR was increased (86%) and mortality was decreased (0%) significantly with liposomal cytarabine compared to triple i.th. prophylaxis during induction, since the latter probably induced more bone marrow toxicity. Reduced ED contributed considerably to improved OS. Moderate intensive consolidation was feasible and ASP, including PEG-ASP, was well tolerated. Age was correlated with outcome and 75 yrs appears to be the upper limit for this regimen. General condition was an additional highly relevant prognostic factor whereas comorbidity, measured by Charlson score was associated with ED but not with OS. These results encourage further treatment optimisation in older ALL pts, including those with comorbidities, based on comprehensive diagnostics, geriatric assessment, MRD evaluation, intensified consolidation, use of ASP, dose-reduced stem cell transplantation and integration of new, targeted drugs. Disclosures: Goekbuget: Medac: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Glaxo: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Micromet/AMGEN: Consultancy; Sigma Tau: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Liposomal cytarabine in prophylaxsis of CNS relapse in ALL.
170 The effect of Rituximab in conjunction with a chemo induction and consolidation therapy was studied in CD20+, Ph/BCR-ABL negative B-precursor ALL (Pre-B/Common) in the GMALL Study 07/2003. The rationale were encouraging results with combined intensive chemotherapy and Rituximab in CD20+ adult Burkitt lymphoma / leukemia. Furthermore that in previous GMALL studies, improvement of B-precursor ALL by intensification of chemotherapy was limited and the observation that patients with CD20+ cells (antigen expression >20%) had an inferior outcome in adult ALL (Thomas et al. Blood 2009. 113;6330). Aim: In standard risk (SR) patients the aim was to increase the rate of molecular remission (Mol. CR) thereby decreasing the relapse rate and in high risk (HR) patients to reduce the pre-transplant tumour-load and thereby reducing the relapse rate after SCT which was 30–40% in previous GMALL studies. Materials and Methods: Adult ALL patients (15 – 55 years) with standard risk B-precursor ALL being CD20 pos. received Rituximab 375 mg/m2 at day -1 before each induction course (phase I and II), the re-induction course and before each of the six consolidations for a total of 8 doses. High Risk patients, defined as WBC > 30.000 and/or late CR > 4 weeks, which are candidates for a stem cell transplantation in CR 1 after wk 16, received Rituximab three times (d -1 ind. I/II and Cons. I) before SCT. Patients receiving Rituximab were compared with earlier CD20+ patients in the GMALL study 07/2003 with identical chemo- and supportive therapy but no Rituximab. MRD method and chemo backbone was described earlier [Brüggemann, Blood 2006: 107;1116]. Results: A total of 263 CD20 pos. patients were analyzed in the GMALL study 07/2003; 196 were SR and 67 HR patients. 181 received Rituximab (R+ arm) and were compared to a cohort of 82 patients earlier recruited without Rituximab (R- arm). In the SR there was no difference in the results of induction therapy with a CR rate of 94 % and 91 % in the R+ vs. R- patients. There was also no difference in ED rate 5% vs. 3% or failure/PR 1% vs. 5%. However, MRD course differed substantially. Decrease in MRD load in the R+ vs. R- arm was faster with a Mol CR (MRD <10-4) rate of 57% vs. 27% at day 24 and of 90% vs. 59% at wk 16. Probability for continuous complete remission (CCR) at 5 years was 80% vs. 47% for R+ vs. R- pts. and for overall survival 71% vs. 57%. In the cohort of 67 HR patients the CR rate for R+ vs. R- was 81% vs. 88% due to a higher rate of failure/PR 12% vs. 8%. The ED rates in the R+ vs. R- arm were 7% vs. 4%. There was a higher Mol CR rate at wk 16 in the R+ arm vs. R- with 64% vs. 40%. Overall survival for HR patients at 5 yrs was 55% vs. 36% in the R+ vs. R- group. When only the HR cohort with SCT in CR1 is considered (in 69 % +R and 90% -R SCT in CR1 were performed) the CCR probability was superior for the R+ vs. R- with 67% vs. 37%, due to a lower relapse rate. Conclusion: Intensive chemo- plus immunotherapy with Rituximab is feasible in adult patients with B-precursor ALL in the context of the GMALL protocol 07/2003. In standard risk patients, the complete remission rate was comparable. There was however a faster and higher Mol. CR rate in the Rituximab cohort, with an improvement in remission duration and overall survival. In high risk patients the Mol. CR rate was also higher in the R+ arm and the relapse rate after SCT lower, but probably more Rituximab doses are needed in this patient cohort to reduce the tumour load before SCT further. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe 70–2657-Ho2 and in part by Hoffmann La Roche. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Rituximab: activity against CD20 pos. ALL cells.
670 Introduction: Relapsed/refractory B-precursor ALL in adults has a dismal prognosis with only 35–40% of patients reaching a hematological complete remission (CR) with a median overall survival of 4–6 months. An exploratory phase II trial was conducted in this patient population with blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engaging (BiTE®) antibody that directs cytotoxic T-cells to CD19 expressing target cells. Methods: The primary endpoint was hematological CR or CR with partial hematological recovery (CRh*) within 2 cycles of blinatumomab. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Blinatumomab was administered by continuous intravenous infusion for 28 days followed by a 14-day treatment-free interval. Responding patients had the option to receive 3 additional cycles of treatment or to proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Three dosing regimens were explored (Table 1) to identify the optimal regimen with respect to efficacy and toxicity. Results: 36 patients were treated; 26 out of the 36 treated patients (72%) achieved a hematological CR/CRh*. Ten out of 26 (38%) responders had a CRh*. 24 out 26 (92%) responders achieved also a molecular response (minimal residual disease level below 10−4 as measured by PCR) within the first 2 cycles. Twenty out of 21 (95%) patients in first relapse responded whereas only 6 out of 15 (40%) of the remaining patients achieved a hematological CR/CRh*. Thirteen patients proceeded to allogeneic HSCT in CR/CRh* after blinatumomab treatment, and one of them developed a medullary CD19− relapse after allogeneic HSCT. The other 13 responders did not receive allogeneic HSCT. Eight of these 13 patients relapsed: 2 relapses were CD19− (1 medullary and 1 extramedullary); 3 were CD19+ (1 medullary and 2 extramedullary), and 3 were with pending CD19 status (all 3 medullary). The median survival for all 36 treated patients is 9.0 months with a median follow-up time for OS of 10.7 months. For patients who achieved a CR/CRh*, the median survival is 14.1 months whereas for patients who failed blinatumomab therapy the median survival is 6.6 months. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and CNS events were reported as medically important events. Two patients with high tumor burden and no cytoreductive prephase required treatment interruption or discontinuation. CRS syndrome could be either prevented or treated by adapting a dexamethasone regimen for patients resulting in no further treatment interruption due to CRS. Fully reversible adverse drug events of the CNS leading to treatment interruption were observed in 6 patients: 3 patients with seizures and 3 patients with encephalopathy. CNS symptoms fully resolved, and all 6 patients were able to resume treatment at a lower dose; however, 2 out of these 6 patients had a recurrent event and permanently discontinued. One patient stopped treatment due to fungal infection leading to death. As final dose and schedule, 5 μg/m2/day in week 1 and 15 μg/m2/day for the remaining treatment (as in cohorts 2a and 3) was selected for further investi-gation based on safety and efficacy considerations. In the extension cohort, cohort 3 (n=18), the most common treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) were pyrexia (70%), headache (39%), tremor (30%) and fatigue (30%). Summary: The final dosing regimen of blinatumomab produced exceptionally high complete hematological and molecular remission rates and was well-tolerated. Updated follow-up information regarding duration of response and survival will be presented. A global phase II study to confirm these data is being conducted. Disclosures: Topp: Amgen: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy. Goekbuget:AMGEN: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Zugmaier:Amgen: Employment. Mergen:Amgen Research Munich GmbH: Employment. Bargou:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.