. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.The copyright holder for this preprint (which . http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/373555 doi: bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jul. 22, 2018; Main Text 1 Type 1 narcolepsy (T1N) is a sleep disorder that affects 1/3,000 individuals across ethnic 2 groups 1-3 . Onset is typically in childhood through early adulthood. Symptoms are caused by the 3 destruction of hypocretin/orexin neurons, a small neuronal subpopulation of the hypothalamus 4 . 4Although the disease is considered autoimmune, the exact mechanism leading to hypocretin cell 5 death is still unclear. Indeed, T1N is strongly associated with alleles encoding the heterodimer 6 DQ0602 haplotype (HLA-DQA1*01:02~DQB1*06:02, 97% vs. 25%) across ethnic groups 5,6 . 7Other loci previously associated with the disease include T cell receptor (TCR) loci alpha (TRA) 8 and beta (TRB), receptors of HLA-peptide presentations, and other autoimmune associated 9 genes (CTSH, P2RY11, ZNF365, IFNAR1 and TNFSF4) [7][8][9][10] . 11Triggers of T1N point to the immune system, including influenza and Streptococcus Pyogenes 12 infections 9,11,12 , as well as immunization with Pandemrix®, an influenza-A vaccine developed 13 specifically against the H1N1 "swine flu" strain 13-20 suggest a strong environmental modifier of 14 disease risk for narcolepsy. Increased T1N incidence following the Pandemrix® vaccination was 15 first seen in Northern Europe [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] with 8-fold increase in incidence in (0.79/100,000 to 16 6.3/100,000) in children. The specificity was striking, as increased T1N was later detected in all 17 countries where Pandemrix® was used, whereas countries using other pH1N1 vaccine brands 18 did not detect vaccination-associated increases in incidence [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] . is defined by antigen presentation, mediated through specific T cell receptor chains, and 27 modulated by influenza-A as a critical trigger. 28. CC-BY 4.0 International license It is made available under a was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.The copyright holder for this preprint (which . http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/373555 doi: bioRxiv preprint first posted online Jul. 22, 2018; examined using LD Score Regression 33 , the shared heritability was largest with type-1 diabetes Genetics of vaccination-triggered narcolepsy. We have previously shown that both influenza 21 infections and, in rare cases, immunization with Pandemrix® can trigger narcolepsy 13,18,19,42,43 . 22The baseline for narcolepsy in unvaccinated vs. Pandemrix® vaccinated individuals was 23 0.7/100,000 vs. 9/100,000 person years with on average 10-fold increase in risk 13,18,19,[42][43][44] was not peer-reviewed) is t...

To search for discriminating biomarkers, 30 patients with idiopathic rapid‐eye‐movements sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) were compared with 17 patients with RBD within narcolepsy type 1. Both groups underwent extensive examinations, including skin biopsy searching for phosphorylated α‐synuclein deposits and whole‐night video‐polysomnography. Skin biopsy was positive for phosphorylated α‐synuclein deposits in 86.7% of iRBD patients and in none of narcoleptic patients. The analysis of video‐polysomnographic motor events showed differences in their occurrence throughout the night in the two groups. iRBD and RBD due to narcolepsy do have different clinical and pathological findings, confirming a different pathophysiology.

No abstract

Study Objectives Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) is a chronic rare hypersomnia of central origin requiring a combination of behavioral and pharmacological treatments. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, in Italy the population was forced into a lockdown. With this study, we aimed to describe the lockdown impact on NT1 symptom management, according to different patients' working schedule. Methods In the period between 10 April and 15 May 2020, we performed routine follow‐up visits by telephone (as recommended during the COVID‐19 emergency) to 50 patients >18 years old (40% males) under stable long‐term treatment. We divided patients into three groups: unchanged working schedule, forced working/studying at home, and those who lost their job (“lost occupation”). Current sleep–wake habit and symptom severity were compared with prelockdown assessment (six months before) in the three patient groups. Results At assessment, 20, 22, and eight patients belonged to the unchanged, working/studying at home, and lost occupation groups, respectively. While in the lost occupation group, there were no significant differences compared with prepandemic assessment, the patients with unchanged schedules reported more nocturnal awakenings, and NT1 patients working/studying at home showed an extension of nocturnal sleep time, more frequent daytime napping, improvement of daytime sleepiness, and a significant increase in their body mass index. Sleep‐related paralysis/hallucinations, automatic behaviors, cataplexy, and disturbed nocturnal sleep did not differ. Conclusions Narcolepsy type 1 patients working/studying at home intensified behavioral interventions (increased nocturnal sleep time and daytime napping) and ameliorated daytime sleepiness despite presenting with a slight, but significant, increase of weight.

ObjectiveTo perform a rigorous in-depth proteomics analysis to identify circulating biomarker signatures for idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD), capable of providing new insights into the underlying pathogenic mechanisms and putative α-synuclein-related neurodegenerative processes.MethodsSerum samples from patients with idiopathic RBD (n = 9) and healthy controls (n = 10) were subjected to a thorough liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (MS)/MS proteomics analysis using ultimate 3,000 nanoLC interfaced to an ESI-orbitrap velos. Data were analyzed with a systems biology approach to identify altered pathways in RBD.ResultsWe identified 259 proteins, 11 of which displayed significantly altered expression level in patients with RBD as compared to controls. Significant reduction in serum levels of dopamine β-hydroxylase (DBH) and vitamin D binding protein (GC) were consistent with alterations in the norepinephrinergic (NErgic) and dopaminergic systems, respectively. Additional altered protein profiles indicated that immunity, inflammation, complement, and coagulation also play a role in RBD pathophysiology.ConclusionsOur results shed light on the protein signature profile, molecular pathways, and mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of RBD and its clinical manifestation. This knowledge opens a new avenue towards more accurate and timely diagnosis and characterization of RBD, which might ultimately translate into new therapeutic strategies with disease-modifying effects. Further evaluation of the identified markers is required to confirm their diagnostic value and potential to guide clinical decision-making.

Background Brazil requires the performance of both a test for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and a test for antibodies to the core of hepatitis B for blood donor screening. Blood centres in regions of high HBV endemicity struggle to maintain adequate stocks in face of the high discard rates due to anti-HBc reactivity. We evaluated the potential infectivity of donations positive for anti-HBc in search of a rational approach for the handling of these collections. Study Design and Methods We tested anti-HBc reactive blood donations from the state of Amazonas for the presence of HBV DNA and for titres of anti-HBs. The study population consists of village-based donors from the interior of Amazonas state. Results Among 3600 donations, 799 were anti-HBc reactive (22·2%). We were able to perform real-time PCR for the HBV S gene on specimens from 291 of these donors. Eight of these samples were negative for HBsAg and positive for HBV DNA and were defined as occult B virus infections (2·7%). Six of those eight specimens had anti-HBs titres above 100 mIU/ml, indicating the concomitant presence of the virus with high antibody titres. Conclusion A small proportion of anti-HBc reactive donors carry HBV DNA and anti-HBs testing is not useful for predicting viremia on them. This finding indicates the possibility of HBV transmission from asymptomatic donors, especially in areas of high HBV prevalence. Sensitive HBV DNA nucleic acid testing may provide another level of safety, allowing eventual use of anti-HBc reactive units in critical situations.

We report the case of a 14-year-old girl with a wide non-compressive pineal cyst, associated with the inability to control her sleep-wake schedule. Actigraphic monitoring showed a 24-hour free-running disorder (tau 26.96 hours). A 24-hour serum melatonin curve assay, with concomitant video-polysomnographic and body-core temperature monitoring, was performed. Melatonin curve showed a blunted nocturnal peak, lower total quantity of melatonin, and prolonged melatonin secretion in the morning, with normal temperature profile and sleep parameters. Treatment with melatonin up to 14 mg at bedtime was initiated with complete realignment of the sleep-wake rhythm (tau 23.93 hours). The role of the pineal cyst in the aforementioned alteration of melatonin secretion and free-running disorder remains controversial, but our case supports the utility of monitoring sleep/wake, temperature, and melatonin rhythms in the diagnostic work-up of pineal cysts associated with free-running disorder.

Study Objectives Arterial blood pressure (ABP) decreases during sleep compared with wakefulness and this change is blunted in mouse models of and adult patients with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1). We tested whether: (1) pediatric patients with NT1 have similar cardiovascular autonomic abnormalities during nocturnal sleep; and (2) these abnormalities can be linked to hypocretin-1 cerebrospinal fluid concentration (CSF HCRT-1), sleep architecture, or muscle activity. Methods Laboratory polysomnographic studies were performed in 27 consecutive drug-naïve NT1 children or adolescents and in 19 matched controls. Nocturnal sleep architecture and submentalis (SM), tibialis anterior (TA), and hand extensor (HE) electromyographic (EMG) activity were analyzed. Cardiovascular autonomic function was assessed through the analysis of pulse transit time (PTT) and heart period (HP). Results PTT showed reduced lengthening during total sleep and REM sleep compared with nocturnal wakefulness in NT1 patients than in controls, whereas HP did not. NT1 patients had altered sleep architecture, higher SM EMG during REM sleep, and higher TA and HE EMG during N1–N3 and REM sleep when compared with controls. PTT alterations found in NT1 patients were more severe in subjects with lower CSF HRCT-1, but did not cluster or correlate with sleep architecture alterations or muscle overactivity during sleep. Conclusion Our results suggest that pediatric NT1 patients close to disease onset have impaired capability to modulate ABP as a function of nocturnal wake–sleep transitions, possibly as a direct consequence of hypocretin neuron loss. The relevance of this finding for cardiovascular risk later in life remains to be determined.