Cet article étudie la manière dont l’œuvre de Walter Benjamin a été récemment revisitée sous une lumière créative plutôt que du point du vue purement théorique et critique. De quelle façon les textes Benjamin sont-ils repris sous la forme d’expérimentations littéraires et artistiques ? Quelles dimensions de sa biographie, de son style et de sa méthode ont été particulièrement importantes dans l’émergence de ces approches créatives ? Quelles versions de New York mettent-elles en évidence ? Cet article se penche sur deux ouvrages et une exposition qui partent du Livre des passages pour adopter la perspective de la philosophie spéculative, de « l’écriture sans écriture » et du commissariat d’exposition : The Manhattan Project de David Kishik (2015), Capital. New York, Capital of the 20th Century de Kenneth Goldsmith (2017) et l’exposition The Arcades. Contemporary Art and Walter Benjamin organisée par le Jewish Museum de New York (2017).Ces trois exemples sont ancrés dans New York et offrent une perspective américaine sur Le Livre des passages.
Richard Powers's The Overstory (2018) offers a re-centering of human history and literature around trees and forests as highly relevant, even unsurpassable, biotic and semiotic systems. Trees become an alternative measure of all things in an attempt to question anthropocentrism and to represent humans and trees growing together in a joint narrative in which the emphasis is displaced from the former towards the latter. Divided into four parts entitled "Roots", "Trunk", "Crown" and "Seeds", the novel explicitly follows an organic model that functions as an all-encompassing metanarrative (the "overstory" spelled out in the title). While this model suggests connectiveness, circulation, dissemination and growth, it also entails a reframing of temporality and history, and ultimately a reassessment of literature in general and of the novel as a genre in particular. 1 The Overstory encodes a reflection on the thematic and formal potential of literature activated by a tree-based approach. This article seeks to elucidate the ways in which Powers's engagement with trees and forests invites a reconsideration of American geography, history and literature in general. The novel builds on Transcendentalism, nature writing and environmentalist philosophies, reworking their most radical strands in its ambition to question the place of the human and to embrace a bold version of tree-inspired ethics and imagination. Margaret Atwood compared Powers to Melville in terms of literary scope and vision (Atwood 2006). The Overstory appears to grant non-human creatures (trees) the same central role and encyclopedic treatment that Moby-Dick granted whales in 19 th -century American literature. However, Powers's novel goes much further in wrenching nonhuman creatures from subordination to human goals and fantasy, and in promoting trees to the "active voice" that Val Plumwood argued in favor of, reflecting on how agency, point of view and voice can be granted to trees. Early in the novel, the character of Nicholas Hoel and his ancestor who planted the chestnut tree that dominates the first section come to the realization that art, just like trees, "makes you
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.