Background and Study Aims Stereotactic biopsy is a versatile, minimally invasive technique to obtain tissue safely from intracranial lesions for their histologic diagnosis and therapeutic management. Our objective was to determine the anatomical, radiologic, and technical factors that can affect the diagnostic yield of this technique. We suggest recommendations to improve its use in clinical practice. Methods This retrospective study evaluated 407 patients who underwent stereotactic biopsies in the past 34 years. The surgical methodology changed through time, distinguished by three distinct periods. Different stereotactic frames (Todd-Wells, CRW, Leksell), neuroimaging tests, and planning programs were used. Using SPSS software v.23, we analyzed a total of 50 variables for each case. Results The series included 265 men (65.1%) and 142 women (34.9%) (average age 53.8 years). The diagnostic yield was 90.4%, morbidity was 5.65% (n = 17), and mortality was 0.98% (n = 4). Intraoperative biopsy improved accuracy (p = 0.024). Biopsies of deep lesions (p = 0.043), without contrast enhancement (p = 0.004), edema (p = 0.036), extensive necrosis (p = 0.028), or a large cystic component (p = 0.023) resulted in a worse diagnostic yield. Neurosurgeons inexperienced in stereotactic techniques obtained more nondiagnostic biopsies (p = 0.043). Experience was the clearest predictive factor of diagnostic yield (odds ratio: 4.049). Conclusions Increased experience in stereotactic techniques, use of the most suitable magnetic resonance imaging sequences during biopsy planning, and intraoperative evaluation of the sample before finalizing the collection are recommended features and ways to improve the diagnostic yield of this technique.

Although a higher level of training is necessary, we believe that the described technique is a very effective decision in cases of spondylolisthesis, isthmic or degenerative, refractory to conservative treatment, for the obtaining the best clinical results and rates of fusion, with similar risks to those of the other published techniques. Our statistical analysis could contribute to improve outcomes after surgery.

Our results show that the modifications that we performed on the technique originally described have made it into a simpler, more efficacious and safer procedure, without lessening its essential objectives.

Background: Stereotactic biopsy is a well-established procedure in neurosurgery. Our objective is to define the clinical, radiological, and technical factors that can condition the emergence of postbiopsy symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Based on our findings, we suggest recommendations to improve its usual clinical practice. Methods: We made a retrospective study of 429 cases with stereotactic biopsies performed in the past 37 years. The surgical procedure-was adapted in terms of the stereotactic frames (Todd-Wells, CRW, Leksell), neuroimaging tests, and planning programs available in the hospital. Fifty-three variables were analyzed for each patient (SPSS.23). Results: The diagnostic yield was 90.7%. Forty-one patients (9.5%) suffered a symptomatic postbiopsy hemorrhage; only 17 (3.9%) had permanent morbidity. The mortality was 0.93% (n = 4). A postsurgical CT scan was requested only in 99 patients (23%) of our series. Lesion mass effect, cystic component, contrast enhancement, histological nature, or number of targets were not associated with a greater risk of symptomatic postbiopsy hemorrhage (P > 0.05). On the other hand, the biopsies made by nonexpert neurosurgeons (P = 0.01) or under general anesthesia (P = 0.02) resulted in a greater risk of symptomatic postbiopsy hemorrhage. Anesthetic type was the clearest predictive factor of bleeding with this technique (OR: 0.24). Conclusion: Stereotactic biopsy is a very valuable tool. To optimize its safety and minimize the risk of intracranial bleeding, it requires both a knowledge of stereotactic techniques and very careful surgical planning. While the patient’s stay in intensive vigilance units after the procedure is a useful strategy, the request for control CT scans should be conditioned by the clinical evolution of each patient.