Efforts to limit global warming to below 2°C in relation to the pre‐industrial level are under way, in accordance with the 2015 Paris Agreement. However, most impact research on agriculture to date has focused on impacts of warming >2°C on mean crop yields, and many previous studies did not focus sufficiently on extreme events and yield interannual variability. Here, with the latest climate scenarios from the Half a degree Additional warming, Prognosis and Projected Impacts (HAPPI) project, we evaluated the impacts of the 2015 Paris Agreement range of global warming (1.5 and 2.0°C warming above the pre‐industrial period) on global wheat production and local yield variability. A multi‐crop and multi‐climate model ensemble over a global network of sites developed by the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP) for Wheat was used to represent major rainfed and irrigated wheat cropping systems. Results show that projected global wheat production will change by −2.3% to 7.0% under the 1.5°C scenario and −2.4% to 10.5% under the 2.0°C scenario, compared to a baseline of 1980–2010, when considering changes in local temperature, rainfall, and global atmospheric CO2 concentration, but no changes in management or wheat cultivars. The projected impact on wheat production varies spatially; a larger increase is projected for temperate high rainfall regions than for moderate hot low rainfall and irrigated regions. Grain yields in warmer regions are more likely to be reduced than in cooler regions. Despite mostly positive impacts on global average grain yields, the frequency of extremely low yields (bottom 5 percentile of baseline distribution) and yield inter‐annual variability will increase under both warming scenarios for some of the hot growing locations, including locations from the second largest global wheat producer—India, which supplies more than 14% of global wheat. The projected global impact of warming <2°C on wheat production is therefore not evenly distributed and will affect regional food security across the globe as well as food prices and trade.
This paper evaluates the usefulness of the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) for monitoring transpiration and water status in almond trees, and proposes a methodology for assessing crop yield derived from the relation between canopy temperature and transpiration. For this purpose, a Non-Water Stress Baseline (NWSB) was developed from canopy temperature measurements taken with Infrared Thermometers (IRT) installed permanently over well-watered trees for three years. Tree transpiration was measured continuously with sap flow probes installed in the same trees than the IRT sensors. The calculated CWSI was closely related to water potential and stomatal conductance measured during kernel filling, as well as with transpiration and the ratio kT/GC (the transpiration coefficient over the ground cover). Taking into consideration this relation and the water production function recently published, the seasonal CWSI was compared to final yield and the regression yielded good results (R 2 =0.80). An empirical relationship between the CWSI acquired remotely from two flights performed during the kernel filling stage and crop yield was determined for this orchard. The estimated yield from the proposed methodology was compared to ground-truth measurements of crop yield measured in 80 trees during 2014 and 2015. The result obtained a RMSE that yielded 1.54 kg/tree. This study thus demonstrates that CWSI is closely related to the transpiration and the ratio kT/GC. This relation settles the basis for the development of methodologies for estimating water-limited crop yield from thermal derived information.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.