Behavioural studies in apraxic patients revealed dissociations between the processing of meaningful (MF) and meaningless (ML) gestures. Consequently, the existence of two differential neural mechanisms for the imitation of either gesture type has been postulated. While the indirect (semantic) route exclusively enables the imitation of MF gestures, the direct route can be used for the imitation of any gesture type, irrespective of meaning, and thus especially for ML gestures. Concerning neural correlates, it is debated which of the visuo-motor streams (i.e., the ventral steam, the ventro-dorsal stream, or the dorso-dorsal stream) supports the postulated indirect and direct imitation routes. To probe the hypotheses that regions of the dorso-dorsal stream are involved differentially in the imitation of ML gestures and that regions of the ventro-dorsal stream are involved differentially in the imitation of MF gestures, we analysed behavioural (imitation of MF and ML finger gestures) and lesion data of 293 patients with a left hemisphere (LH) stroke. Confirming previous work, the current sample of LH stroke patients imitated MF finger gestures better than ML finger gestures. The analysis using voxel-based lesion symptom mapping (VLSM) revealed that LH damage to dorso-dorsal stream areas was associated with an impaired imitation of ML finger gestures, whereas damage to ventro-dorsal regions was associated with a deficient imitation of MF finger gestures. Accordingly, the analyses of the imitation of visually uniform and thus highly comparable MF and ML finger gestures support the dual-route model for gesture imitation at the behavioural and lesion level in a substantial patient sample. Furthermore, the data show that the direct route for ML finger gesture imitation depends on the dorso-dorsal visuo-motor stream while the indirect route for MF finger gesture imitation is related to regions of the ventro-dorsal visuo-motor stream.
Data show that LH stroke can lead to reduced awareness not only for aphasic deficits but also for buccofacial and limb apraxia. (PsycINFO Database Record
Background and Objective: Apraxia is a deficit of motor cognition leading to difficulties in actual tool use, imitation of gestures, and pantomiming object use. To date, little data exist regarding the recovery from apraxic deficits after stroke, and no statistical lesion mapping study investigated the neural correlate of recovery from apraxia. Accordingly, we here examined recovery from apraxic deficits, differential associations of apraxia task (imitation vs. pantomime) and effector (bucco-facial vs. limb apraxia) with recovery, and the underlying neural correlates. Methods: We assessed apraxia in 39 patients with left hemisphere (LH) stroke both at admission and approximately 11 days later. Furthermore, we collected clinical imaging data to identify brain regions associated with recovery from apraxic deficits using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM). Results: Between the two assessments, a significant recovery from apraxic deficits was observed with a tendency of enhanced recovery of limb compared to bucco-facial apraxia. VLSM analyses revealed that within the lesion pattern initially associated with apraxia, lesions of the left insula were associated with remission of apraxic deficits, whereas lesions to the (inferior) parietal lobe (IPL; supramarginal and angular gyrus) and the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) were associated with persistent apraxic deficits. Conclusion: Data suggest that lesions affecting the core regions (and white matter) of the fronto-parietal praxis network cause more persistent apraxic deficits than lesions affecting other regions (here: the left insula) that also contribute to motor cognition and apraxic deficits.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.