In recent years, the United States (US) has experienced a resurrection in hydrocarbon recovery owing to the extraction of oil and gas from unconventional resources. Due to the ultra-low permeability nature of these reservoirs and their oil-wet characteristics, oil production declines are steep and oil recoveries remain very low (< 12% of OOIP). This challenge endures even with the assistance of hydraulic fracturing advancements and well spacing optimizations. The billions of barrels of remaining oil is a good target for chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technologies. In this study, after comprehensive laboratory testing, a series of customized chemical formulations was developed to improve oil recovery under the challenging conditions of the Middle Bakken and Niobrara formations (temperature >110 °C, salinity>220,000 ppm, and hardness>15,000 ppm). To examine the performance of the selected formulation in the field-scale, a single well enhancement trial was carried out. A detailed review of the lab and field data (pre-and post- treatment) is discussed in this study. Oil rate decline analysis and numerical simulations were used to obtain more insight about the true effectiveness of the chemical treatments. The results of this field trial reveal that injecting a proper wettability altering agent can improve oil recovery from shale oil reservoirs by up to 25% of the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR). The results of numerical simulations also show that the additional oil recovered in this field trial cannot be achieved by either well shut-in or straight water injection. The lessons learned from this study provide practical information to optimize similar field trial designs leading to more profitable projects. The concepts and information here can be also translated to other unconventional basins and gas condensate or wet/dry gas reservoirs.
Colloidal Dispersion Gels (CDG's) have been successfully tested in Argentina, China, USA, and recently in Colombia. However, questions remain whether CDG's can be injected in large volumes and propagate deep into the formation without reducing injectivity and also improve sweep efficiency. This paper summarizes 31 implemented and ongoing CDG projects in Argentina, Colombia and the U.S. since 2005. Project summary review includes main reservoir properties, operating conditions, pore volume of chemical injected, general project performance, and especially, a detailed analysis of injection logs addressing the injectivity of CDG. Additionally, a general approach for history matching CDG floods is described. CDG injection volumes in projects reviewed vary from a few thousand barrels to hundreds of thousands of barrels. Projects evaluated did not show injectivity reduction even after more than 600,000 barrels injected in one well. Polymer concentration and polymer: crosslinker ratios ranged from 250 to 1,200 ppm and 20:1 to 80:1, respectively. Aluminum citrate is the most common crosslinker used in field projects. However, chromium triacetate has been used in high salinity and hardness conditions. Key variables to sustain the injection of large volumes of CDG below maximum operating pressure are polymer: crosslinker ratios, polymer concentration, and injection rates to a lesser extent. CDG projects have evolved from small to large treatment volumes showing a positive impact on oil recoveries. Despite large volumes of CDG injected production of polymer in offset producers has rarely been detected. Wellhead pressure response, CDG viscosity, and adsorption/retention (RRF) represents the most important variables needed to match CDG floods. This study provides the status of the technology and field evidence that CDG's can be injected in large volumes and can propagate into the reservoir without injectivity constraints. This review will also provide guidance to successfully design and evaluate CDG pilot projects. Lessons learned from operating and modeling CDG projects will also be presented.
This paper describes the interpretation of a successful inter-well field trial of a novel reservoir-triggered polymer technology, making use of pressure transient analysis and numerical simulation. The polymer has been engineered to improve sweep in oil-bearing formations whilst reducing the impact of two of the key operational and economic challenges facing polymer enhanced oil recovery (EOR). The polymer employs a chemical strategy to render it resistant to shear during injection and in the high flux region at the sand face. In addition, the injection solution has a viscosity similar to that of water until triggered in the reservoir, which sustains injectivity. We demonstrate the use of laboratory kinetics, rheology data, high-resolution surveillance of the injector, and comprehensive analysis of produced fluids to constrain the simulation of the in-situ viscosification of this polymer. Numerical models using commercial and in-house R&D codes were calibrated to tracer effluent data, pressure fall-off tests, and injection pressures, to interpret the size and mobility of the polymer bank and its response to water injection. The field trial has qualified the polymer to be considered for deployment. A comprehensive surveillance programme and downhole sampling was used to successfully demonstrate that the polymer was protected from shear degradation upon injection and propagation, and it viscosified under flow at the designed location in the reservoir. Kinetic and rheology data from laboratory testing, combined with reservoir-scale simulations and field trial surveillance, enabled the reaction and adsorption characteristics of the polymer to be estimated. Simulations of the injection pressure demonstrate that this polymer has significantly better injectivity under matrix conditions than would be obtained with a conventional polymer of an equivalent deep-reservoir viscosity.
Several surfactant formulations that had been tested successfully in oil-wet unconventional reservoirs were tested in mixed-wet to oil-wet unconventional reservoir cores and did not generate the expected results. To study the mechanisms of oil recovery and understand the uniqueness of these shale reservoirs, a series of studies were performed utilizing Eagle Ford (EF) and Canadian Bakken shale rocks and fluids. In this study customized chemical formulations for improving production from the EF and the Canadian Bakken were developed. Previously related formulation development for the Bakken and Permian basins relied upon wettability alteration as the oil recovery mechanism; however, no significant oil recovery compared to brine was seen from wettability-altering formulations using EF and Canadian Bakken shale rock and fluids. Several imbibition tests showed that baseline oil recovery by brine was 20-30% of original oil in place (OOIP) for both formations. High oil recovery by brine was attributed to the mixed to water-wet nature of the pore surface. A well-connected fracture system may have also contributed. Further, there was no correlation between oil recovery and contact angle measurements. Failure of wettability alteration as an oil recovery mechanism led to investigation of interfacial tension (IFT) reduction as an alternative mechanism. Testing this hypothesis, a change in the EF formulation reduced IFT to 0.03 dyne/cm and had oil recoveries above 60% OOIP. However, these formulations were not stable at 320 °F. Formulation KPIs were set as lowering IFT and being stable up to 320 °F. Out of many formulations tested, two containing multiple actives in a specific mixture of solvents passed the KPIs and were tested for imbibition oil recovery. A synergistic mixture had a final oil recovery above 56% OOIP as compared to 20-25% OOIP for brine alone. The imbibition oil recovery results indicate that although the ultimate oil recovery by brine alone is significant, the early oil production is significantly slower than by surfactant solutions. Upscaling the laboratory time to the field time emphasizes the value of implementing customized surfactant formulation in both early and late oil production. Similarly, there was no correlation between wettability contact angle measurements and oil recovery for the Canadian Bakken shale. Surfactant formulations which exhibited low IFT (~0.01 dyne/cm) significantly accelerated the oil production and recovered an additional 30-45% OOIP in the tertiary mode from the imbibition tests. Further laboratory studies via the Washburn method, imbibition tests, and zeta potential measurements validated lowering IFT, not altering the wettability, as a primary oil recovery mechanism in the mixed-wet EF and Canadian Bakken. Optimal formulations for EF and Canadian Bakken will be tested in the field by mid-2018.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.