This paper compares two methods for retrofitting an existing hospital concrete structure to improve its seismic performance: internal and external retrofitting. Internal retrofitting involves adding chevron braces, reinforcing shear walls with Fibre-reinforced plastic (FRP) coating, and wrapping the walls, columns, and beams using steel jackets. External retrofitting uses two braced exterior steel frames connected to the concrete building using dampers. The paper also proposes a new design objective for hospital structures that ensures immediate occupancy performance level under earthquake hazard level-1 and prevents collapse under higher ground motion intensity. The paper evaluates the base structure, the two retrofitting schemes, and the proposed design method using pushover and nonlinear dynamic analyses under 20 selected earthquake records. The paper then compares the probabilistic seismic risk models using fragility curves. The results show that external retrofitting is more effective and economical than internal retrofitting and that the proposed design objective can significantly reduce the seismic risk of hospital structures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.