This work presents an approach for the localization and control of helical robots during removal of superficial blood clots inside in vitro and ex vivo models. The position of the helical robot is estimated using an array of Hall-effect sensors and precalculated magnetic field map of two synchronized rotating dipole fields. The estimated position is used to implement closed-loop motion control of the helical robot using the rotating dipole fields. We validate the localization accuracy by visual feedback and feature tracking inside the in vitro model. The experimental results show that the magnetic localization of a helical robot with diameter of 1 mm can achieve a mean absolute position error of 2.35 ± 0.4 mm (n = 20). The simultaneous localization and motion control of the helical robot enables propulsion toward a blood clot and clearing at an average removal rate of 0.67 ± 0.47 mm3/min. This method is used to localize the helical robot inside a rabbit aorta (ex vivo model), and the localization accuracy is validated using ultrasound feedback with a mean absolute position error of 2.6 mm.
In this letter, we develop a magnetic localization system for an electromagnetic-based haptic interface (EHI). Haptic interaction is achieved using a controlled magnetic force applied via an EHI on a magnetic dipole attached to a wearable finger splint. The position of the magnetic dipole is estimated using two identical arrays of three-dimensional magnetic field sensors in order to eliminate the magnetic field generated by the EHI. The measurements of these arrays are used to estimate the position of the magnetic dipole by an artificial neural network. This network maps the field readings to the position of the magnetic dipole. The proposed system is experimentally validated under four cases of the magnetic field generated by the EHI. These cases are likely to be encountered during the haptic rendering of virtual shapes. In the absence of the magnetic field, the mean absolute position error (MAE) is 0.80 ± 0.30 mm (n = 125). Static and sinusoidal magnetic fields are applied, and the MAEs are 1.26 ± 0.43 mm (n = 125) and 0.91 ± 0.33 mm (n = 125), respectively. A random time-varying magnetic field is applied, and the MAE is 0.86 ± 0.33 mm (n = 125). Our statistical analysis shows that the repeatability of the magnetic localization is acceptable regardless of the field generated by the EHI, at α = 0.05 and 95% confidence level.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.