Objectives: Even with excellent fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), there will be a substantial risk of biological complications, such as caries, if proper oral hygiene is not maintained. This study aimed to evaluate the risks of developing secondary caries with FDPs in relation to the patient oral hygiene status.Material and Methods: Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed for patients to collect data related to their FDP complications and oral hygiene status. The main clinical parameter analyzed was secondary caries.Complications such as a fracture, debonding, or the need for endodontic therapy were also analyzed. The interval survival rate and the cumulative survival rate of FDPs from the time of treatment to the time of follow-up were analyzed.Results: A total of 423 patients (with a total of 1116 FDPs) were examined in this study, with a mean age of 43.7 years and a mean follow-up time of 7 years.Regarding complications, secondary caries was detected in 94 FDPs (8.4%), fracture (or chipping) in 85 (7.6%) cases, need for endodontic treatment in 42 cases (3.7%), and debonding in four (0.3%) cases. Secondary caries was found in nine out of 219 FDPs (4%) in patients with good oral hygiene, 35 out of 634 FDPs (5.5%) in patients with fair oral hygiene, and 50 out of 272 FDPs (18.4%) in patients with poor oral hygiene (p ≤ .001).Conclusions: Good oral hygiene has a great influence on reducing the risk of secondary caries in patients with FDPs. The occurrence of secondary caries is a common complication in patients with poor oral hygiene.

This case report evaluates the use of a customized healing abutment of a dental implant to upright a mesially tilted molar using elastic separating rings. The external surface of the healing abutment was roughened by air particle abrasion, and a flowable composite was applied as a collar around it. The size of the resin collar was increased several times during the molar uprighting treatment by replacing the elastic ring. The uprighting procedure was evaluated after 2 months using radiographic and clinical evaluations. After treatment, the mesiodistal space above the implant was increased from 6 mm to 9 mm as follows: 2 mm by uprighting the second molar and 1 mm by mesial shifting the second premolar, and then a screw‐retained zirconia crown was placed to restore the implant. The healing abutment of the implant can be modified by adding a resin collar and used as orthodontic anchorage for uprighting the adjacent tilted molar to facilitate the prosthetic procedure. Neither special instruments nor an orthodontic background are required for this minor tooth movement.