The injection of Low Salinity Water (LSWI) as an Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) method has recently attracted a lot of attention. Extensive research has been conducted to investigate and identify the positive effects of LSWI on oil recovery. In order to demonstrate the impact of introducing low salinity water into a reservoir, simulations on the ECLIPSE 100 simulator are being done in this work. To simulate an actual reservoir, an easy static model was made. In order to replicate the effects of injecting low salinity water and normal salinity, or seawater, the reservoir is three-phase with oil, gas, and water. It has one injector and one producer. Five cases were suggested to investigate the effect of low salinity water injection with different concentrations and the period of injection. The low salinity injection period varied from twenty-five years in case one and reduced five years in each case until reached to five years in final case. Higher oil recovery factor obtained in case one with injection time twenty-five years and lower recovery factor for case five with injection time of low salinity water injection five years. Lower water concentration gives higher oil recovery for all cases where this study investigated the effect of low-salinity water flooding as slug injection. From the five cases presented, field oil recovery factor (FOE), field oil production rate (FOPR), field oil production total (FOPT), field pressure (FP), and field water cut (FWCT) were observed. Oil recovery is 56.6 percent in high salinity water flooding (HSWF), and 71.8 percent in low salinity water flooding (LSWF) for 0 percent salt concentration and 62.40 percent for 20 percent salt concentration as in case one.
Oil and natural gas may be found in commercial reservoirs, porous and easily permeable rocks. Porosity is an essential characteristic of reservoirs. This research focuses on comparing laboratory-measured porosity to log porosity. A comparison of the porosity values determined in the lab using the liquid saturation technique, density method, an ultrasonic method, and the porosity computed from wireline logs such as sonic, density, and neutron logs. Compaction is the decrease in volume caused by an external force. A discrepancy exists between the laboratory and log porosities because of the rock compaction. It is important to note that porosity may be broken down into two categories: total and effective. After calculating the bulk and grain volumes, the total porosity is determined by averaging the results of several techniques, such as gas density logs, density logs, and neutron logs. The porosity is estimated using ultrasonic equipment in the lab and compared to sonic logs. Sonic tests show a higher porosity in the lab than in the log due to the formation's rocks being compacted. An excellent correlation exists between density log porosity and density porosity from the lab, with a determination coefficient of 0.79.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.