Three-dimensional (3D) maps of the hydropathic environments of protein amino acid residues are information-rich descriptors of preferred conformations, interaction types and energetics, and solvent accessibility. The interactions made by each residue are the primary factor for rotamer selection and the secondary, tertiary, and even quaternary protein structure. Our evolving basis set of environmental data for each residue type can be used to understand the protein structure. This work focuses on the aromatic residues phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan and their structural roles. We calculated and analyzed side chain-to-environment 3D maps for over 70,000 residues of these three types that reveal, with respect to hydrophobic and polar interactions, the environment around each. After binning with backbone ϕ/ψ and side chain χ1, we clustered each bin by 3D similarities between map–map pairs. For each of the three residue types, four bins were examined in detail: one in the β-pleat, two in the right-hand α-helix, and one in the left-hand α-helix regions of the Ramachandran plot. For high degrees of side chain burial, encapsulation of the side chain by hydrophobic interactions is ubiquitous. The more solvent-exposed side chains are more likely to be involved in polar interactions with their environments. Evidence for π–π interactions was observed in about half of the residues surveyed [phenylalanine (PHE): 53.3%, tyrosine (TYR): 34.1%, and tryptophan (TRP): 55.7%], but on an energy basis, this contributed to only ∼4% of the total. Evidence for π–cation interactions was observed in 14.1% of PHE, 8.3% of TYR, and 26.8% of TRP residues, but on an energy basis, this contributed to only ∼1%. This recognition of even these subtle interactions in the 3D hydropathic environment maps is key support for our interaction homology paradigm of protein structure elucidation and possibly prediction.

Atomic-resolution protein structural models are prerequisites for many downstream activities like structure-function studies or structure-based drug discovery. Unfortunately, this data is often unavailable for some of the most interesting and therapeutically important proteins. Thus, computational tools for building native-like structural models from less-than-ideal experimental data are needed. To this end, interaction homology exploits the character, strength and loci of the sets of interactions that define a structure. Each residue type has its own limited set of backbone angle-dependent interaction motifs, as defined by their environments. In this work, we characterize the interactions of serine, cysteine and S-bridged cysteine in terms of 3D hydropathic environment maps. As a result, we explore several intriguing questions. Are the environments different between the isosteric serine and cysteine residues? Do some environments promote the formation of cystine S–S bonds? With the increasing availability of structural data for water-insoluble membrane proteins, are there environmental differences for these residues between soluble and membrane proteins? The environments surrounding serine and cysteine residues are dramatically different: serine residues are about 50% solvent exposed, while cysteines are only 10% exposed; the latter are more involved in hydrophobic interactions although there are backbone angle-dependent differences. Our analysis suggests that one driving force for –S–S– bond formation is a rather substantial increase in burial and hydrophobic interactions in cystines. Serine and cysteine become less and more, respectively, solvent-exposed in membrane proteins. 3D hydropathic environment maps are an evolving structure analysis tool showing promise as elements in a new protein structure prediction paradigm.

The pyridoxal 5′‐phosphate (PLP) homeostasis protein (PLPHP) is a ubiquitous member of the COG0325 family with apparently no catalytic activity. Although the actual cellular role of this protein is unknown, it has been observed that mutations of the PLPHP encoding gene affect the activity of PLP‐dependent enzymes, B6 vitamers and amino acid levels. Here we report a detailed characterization of the Escherichia coli ortholog of PLPHP (YggS) with respect to its PLP binding and transfer properties, stability, and structure. YggS binds PLP very tightly and is able to slowly transfer it to a model PLP‐dependent enzyme, serine hydroxymethyltransferase. PLP binding to YggS elicits a conformational/flexibility change in the protein structure that is detectable in solution but not in crystals. We serendipitously discovered that the K36A variant of YggS, affecting the lysine residue that binds PLP at the active site, is able to bind PLP covalently. This observation led us to recognize that a number of lysine residues, located at the entrance of the active site, can replace Lys36 in its PLP binding role. These lysines form a cluster of charged residues that affect protein stability and conformation, playing an important role in PLP binding and possibly in YggS function.

Graphical abstract

Pyridoxal 5′-phosphate (PLP), the active form of vitamin B6, serves as a cofactor for scores of B6-dependent (PLP-dependent) enzymes involved in many cellular processes. One such B6 enzyme is dopa decarboxylase (DDC), which is required for the biosynthesis of key neurotransmitters, e.g., dopamine and serotonin. PLP-dependent enzymes are biosynthesized as apo-B6 enzymes and then converted to the catalytically active holo-B6 enzymes by Schiff base formation between the aldehyde of PLP and an active site lysine of the protein. In eukaryotes, PLP is made available to the B6 enzymes through the activity of the B6-salvage enzymes, pyridoxine 5′-phosphate oxidase (PNPO) and pyridoxal kinase (PLK). To minimize toxicity, the cell keeps the content of free PLP (unbound) very low through dephosphorylation and PLP feedback inhibition of PNPO and PLK. This has led to a proposed mechanism of complex formation between the B6-salvage enzymes and apo-B6 enzymes prior to the transfer of PLP, although such complexes are yet to be characterized at the atomic level, presumably due to their transient nature. A computational study, for the first time, was used to predict a likely PNPO and DDC complex, which suggested contact between the allosteric PLP tight-binding site on PNPO and the active site of DDC. Using isothermal calorimetry and/or surface plasmon resonance, we also show that PNPO binds both apoDDC and holoDDC with dissociation constants of 0.93 ± 0.07 μM and 2.59 ± 0.11 μM, respectively. Finally, in the presence of apoDDC, the tightly bound PLP on PNPO is transferred to apoDDC, resulting in the formation of about 35% holoDDC.