No abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidural block are often used for analgesia after open nephrectomy surgery. Subcostal anterior quadratus lumborum block may be an alternative. We therefore tested the hypothesis that the continuous subcostal anterior quadratus lumborum block is noninferior to epidural block for analgesia in patients having open partial nephrectomies. METHODS: Adults having open partial nephrectomies were randomly allocated to epidural or unilateral subcostal anterior quadratus lumborum block. The joint primary outcomes were opioid consumption measured in morphine equivalents and pain measured on a numeric rating scale (0–10) from postanesthesia care unit (PACU) until 72 hours after surgery. The noninferiority deltas were 30% for opioid consumption and 1 point on a 0–10 scale for pain. Secondary outcomes included patient global assessment of pain management on the third postoperative day, the number of antiemetic medication doses through the third postoperative day, duration of PACU stay, and postoperative duration of hospitalization. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were randomized to anterior quadratus lumborum block and 29 to epidural analgesia. Neither pain scores nor opioid consumption in the quadratus lumborum patients were noninferior to epidural analgesia. At 72 hours, mean ± standard deviation pain scores in subcoastal anterior quadratus lumborum block and epidural group were 4.7 ± 1.8 and 4.1 ± 1.7, with an estimated difference in pain scores of 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-1.99; noninferiority P = .21). The median [Q1, Q3] opioid consumption was more than doubled in quadratus lumborum patients at 70 mg [43, 125] versus 30 mg [18, 75] in the epidural group with an estimated ratio of geometric means of 1.69 (95% CI, 0.66-4.33; noninferiority P = .80). Patient global assessment and duration of PACU and hospital stays did not differ significantly in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to show that subcostal anterior quadratus lumborum block are noninferior to epidural analgesia in terms of pain scores and opioid consumption for open partial nephrectomies. Effectiveness of novel blocks should be rigorously tested in specific surgical setting before widespread adoption.

Context:Various adjuvants are being used with local anesthetics for prolongation of intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. The α2-adrenergic agonist clonidine and potent opioid buprenorphine have the ability to potentiate the effects of local anesthetics.Aims:The purpose of this prospective, double-blind study was to compare onset, duration of sensory and motor block, effect on hemodynamics, level of sedation, duration of postoperative analgesia, and any adverse effects of clonidine and buprenorphine.Settings and Design:Seventy-five American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I and II patients undergoing lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated into three Groups A, B, and C.Subjects and Methods:Control Group A received injection bupivacaine 0.5% (heavy) 2.5 ml + saline 0.5 ml whereas Group B received injection bupivacaine 0.5% (heavy) 2.5 ml + injection buprenorphine 50 μg and Group C received injection bupivacaine 0.5% (heavy) 2.5 ml + preservative free injection clonidine 50 μg intrathecally.Statistical Analysis Used:Unpaired Student's t-test and Z-test were used for comparing data.Results:Statistically highly significant differences in mean time of sensory regression to L1, mean time to attain the Bromage Score of 1, and mean time of first rescue analgesic request were observed between the three groups. The patients did not suffer any serious side effects.Conclusion:Administration of buprenorphine and clonidine intrathecally does potentiate the duration of analgesia, sensory and motor block, with buprenorphine having a long-lasting effect.

No abstract

No abstract

BACKGROUND: Avoiding intraoperative hypotension might serve as a measure of clinician skill. We, therefore, estimated the range of hypotension in patients of nurse anesthetists, and whether observed differences were associated with a composite of serious complications. METHODS: First, we developed a multivariable model to predict the amount of hypotension, defined as minutes of mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65 mm Hg, for noncardiac surgical cases from baseline characteristics excluding nurse anesthetist. Second, we compared observed and predicted amounts of hypotension for each case and summarized “excess” amounts across providers. Third, we estimated the extent to which hypotension on an individual case level was independently associated with a composite of serious complications. Finally, we assessed the range of actual and excess minutes of MAP <65 mm Hg on a provider level, and the extent to which these pressure exposures were associated with complications. RESULTS: We considered 110,391 hours of anesthesia by 99 nurse anesthetists. A total of 69% of 25,702 included cases had at least 1 minute of MAP <65 mm Hg, with a median (quartiles) of 4 (0–15) minutes on the case level. We were unable to explain much variance of intraoperative hypotension from baseline patient characteristics. However, cases in the highest 2 quartiles (>10 and >24 min/case more than predicted) were an estimated 27% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–1.4) and 31% (95% CI, 1.2–1.5) more likely to experience complications compared to those with 0 excess minutes (both P < .001). There was little variation of the average excess minutes <65 mm Hg across the nurse anesthetists, with median (quartiles) of 1.6 (1.2–1.9) min/h. There was no association in confounder-adjusted models on the nurse anesthetist level between average excess hypotension and complications, either for continuous exposure (P = .09) or as quintiles (P = .30). CONCLUSIONS: Hypotension is associated with complications on a case basis. But the average amount of hypotension for nurse anesthetists over hundreds of cases differed only slightly and was insufficient to explain meaningful differences in complications. Avoiding hypotension is a worthy clinical goal, but does not appear to be a useful metric of performance because the range of average amounts per clinician is not meaningfully associated with patient outcomes, at least among nurse anesthetists in 1 tertiary center.

BACKGROUNDSpinal anaesthesia was introduced in clinical practice by Karl August Bier in 1898. More than a century has passed and even today, it is one of the most popular techniques for both elective and emergency surgical procedures, particularly caesarean section, lower abdominal surgeries, orthopaedic and urological surgeries.The aim of this study was to compare the onset and height of sensory and motor block, haemodynamics, duration of analgesia in post-operative period, number of rescue analgesic epidural doses administered in 24 hours and record complications.

We report the rare complication of a retained peripheral nerve block catheter (PNBC). A 45-year-old man with intractable postamputation phantom limb pain was treated with continuous infusions via femoral and sciatic peripheral nerve catheters. The catheters were removed by an emergency department physician 2 days after placement. Five months later, the patient presented with a discharging sinus from the sciatic nerve catheter site. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was inconclusive. Surgical exploration showed 15 cm of retained peripheral nerve catheter, which was removed.