Background
The clinical course of COVID-19 may vary significantly. The presence of comorbidities prolongs the recovery time. The recovery in patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms might take 10 days, while in those with a critical illness or immunocompromised status could take 15 days. Considering the lack of data about predictors that could affect the recovery time, we conducted this study to identify them.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was implemented in the COVID-19 clinic of a teaching and referral university hospital in Tehran. Patients with the highly suggestive symptoms who had computed tomography (CT) imaging results with typical findings of COVID-19 or positive results of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were enrolled in the study. Inpatient and outpatient COVID-19 participants were followed up by regular visits or phone calls, and the recovery period was recorded.
Results
A total of 478 patients were enrolled. The mean age of patients was 54.11 ± 5.65 years, and 44.2% were female. The median time to recovery was 13.5 days (IQR: 9). Although in the bivariate analysis, multiple factors, including hypertension, fever, diabetes mellitus, gender, and admission location, significantly contributed to prolonging the recovery period, in multivariate analysis, only dyspnea had a significant association with this variable (p = 0.02, the adjusted OR of 2.05; 95% CI 1.12–3.75).
Conclusion
This study supports that dyspnea is a predictor of recovery time. It seems like optimal management of the comorbidities plays the most crucial role in recovery from COVID-19.
Highlights
The study showed a high prevalence of incorrect technique among patients with COPD.
There is an association between inhaler technique (>30% error) and lower quality of life in these patients.
The results of this study suggest that melatonin, a drug with more favorable drug interaction and adverse effect profile, could be more effective than oxazepam in improving the sleep quality and anxiety levels of patients presenting with STEMI, and it could be considered a new alternative to benzodiazepines in this setting.
Cytarabine is a pyrimidine analogue that is used for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia at different doses. Standard doses of cytarabine are used for induction therapy, while high doses are used for post-remission (consolidation) and relapsed/refractory treatment. One of the major side effects of its high doses is acute cerebellar toxicity occurring in 10 to 25% of patients. We report a case that developed this side effect after receiving two doses of high-dose cytarabine. The patient’s symptoms improved after withholding the drug. Thereafter, the patient tolerated treatment continuation with lower doses.
Background Severe hypersensitivity reaction is a dangerous adverse drug reaction in patients receiving cetuximab. It requires drug discontinuation and medical management. Case description A 48-year-old man, previously diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer, was admitted for therapy continuation. During the first infusion of cetuximab, the patient experienced acute signs of hypersensitivity reactions. The treatment team decided to administer cetuximab employing the desensitization protocol. Conclusions This study reports a severe hypersensitivity reaction to cetuximab in an adult patient with colorectal cancer. This patient was successfully managed with a new safe and rapid desensitization protocol.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.