Objectives Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic. The majority of patients experience asymptomatic to mild self-limited disease, but some cases progress to respiratory and multi-organ failure. However, so far, no approved antiviral therapy has been available for treatment of COVID-19. Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) is an approved anti-HCV drug that is capable of suppressing other families of positive-sense RNA viruses with conserved polymerase and may be effective against SARS-CoV-2. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the SOF/VEL combination in addition to the national standard of care versus the national standard of care alone (hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir as well as supportive care) in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 infection. Methods This single-centre, randomized, open-labelled, prospective clinical trial was done in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 admitted to Farabi Hospital in Kermanshah Province, Iran. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the SOF/VEL arm (SOF/VEL plus the national standard of care) or the control arm (the national standard of care alone). The main outcome of the study was the mortality on Day 28 after randomization. Secondary outcomes were time from the start of medication to clinical improvement, hospital length of stay, need for mechanical ventilation, duration of mechanical ventilation and conversion of RT–PCR results from positive to negative from the time of randomization to discharge. Adverse events were evaluated in all patients who started their assigned treatment. Results Between 11 April and 8 June 2020, 80 patients were recruited and randomly assigned into the SOF/VEL (n = 40) and control (n = 40) arms. The primary outcome was not significantly different between the two arms (P = 1.00). Secondary outcomes, including time to clinical improvement, hospital length of stay, need for mechanical ventilation, duration of mechanical ventilation and RT–PCR conversion, were not significantly different between arms either (P > 0.05). SOF/VEL treatment and the national standard of care were tolerated similarly. Conclusions Although treatment with SOF/VEL was safe, adding SOF/VEL to the standard of care did not improve the clinical status or reduce mortality in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. However, larger randomized clinical trials including more parameters are needed for accurate estimation of the efficacy of SOF/VEL.
Background: Because alcohol use disorders (AUDs) in patients living with HIV/AIDS are associated with a reduction in therapeutic outcomes and increases the risk of morbidity/mortality, finding an appropriate pharmacotherapy treatment for this disorder is necessary. Objectives: This systematic review contains studies that examine the effects of pharmacological intervention (oral naltrexone (NTX) or injectable extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX)) on the persons living with HIV and AUDs. Methods: A systematic literature search using three electronic databases including Pubmed Medline, Scopus and the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar was conducted and includes articles published from 1995 to 2019. Records were collected by searching relevant keywords and those that meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria are included. Results: Overall, in this systematic review, the results of 7 relevant studies including pilot and randomized controlled/ clinical trials were summarized and reviewed. Among selected records 2 of these assessed the efficacy of NTX and 5 tested the XR-NTX effectiveness in treating AUDs among persons living with HIV (PLH). In summary, with some expectations, NTX and XR-NTX administration in persons living with HIV and AUDs led to reduced alcohol use, improved viral suppression, unchanged ART adherence and has no significant adverse events. Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review suggest the beneficial effects and safety of the NTX and XR-NTX for treating AUDs in PLH. Further studies are needed in the future to focus on the treatment of AUDs in people living with HIV.
Background:This study was aimed to determine frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility of Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) among colonized patients in outpatient status.Materials and Methods:A total of 2000 nasal nares specimens were collected and inoculated on mannitol salt agar. MRSAs were identified based on mannitol positivity and coagulase test followed by cefoxitin disc diffusion test. Antimicrobial susceptibility of MRSA isolates was performed by E-test method for vancomycin and doxycycline as well as disc diffusion method for sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SMX-TMP), erythromycin, linezolid, and clindamycin. D-test was performed for detection of inducible resistance to clindamycin.Results:Overall, nasal carrier rate of S. aureus and CA-MRSA was estimated 22% and 1.25%, respectively. Out of the 440 S. aureus isolates, 25 isolates were MRSA. All were susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid, and susceptibility rates to SMX-TMP, erythromycin, levofloxacin, doxycycline, and clindamycin were 68%, 44%, 48%, 40% and 44%, respectively; furthermore, 28.5% of resistant isolates to erythromycin had inducible resistance to clindamycin.Conclusion:It seems susceptibility to clindamycin and SMX-TMP, recommended agents for empirical treatment of suspected CA-MRSA, are not promising. Vancomycin and linezolid are effective and reliable antibiotics for the treatment of S. aureus infections.
Background: Assessment of bacteria such as Klebsiella pneumonia has shown that Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) affects antibiotics resistance (e.g., quinolones). Objectives: We studied the prevalence of qnr and aac(6’)Ib-cr genes in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing K. pneumonia strains isolated from burn wounds of patients in the city of Kermanshah, Iran. Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted on 126 K. pneumonia strains isolated collected from burn wounds. Biochemical tests were used to detect the strains. The frequency of the ESBL-producing isolates was determined by phenotypic tests of the combination disk (CD) method after determining the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the isolates through the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion test. The prevalence of the qnr and aac(6’)-Ib-cr genes was determined using their special primers as well as polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results: Of the 126 K. pneumonia isolates, 52 (41.3%) were identified as ESBL-producing strains. ESBL-producing isolates showed higher resistance against antibiotics than non-ESBL-producing ones. PMQR relevance and resistance to ciprofloxacin were, respectively, determined at 80.76% and 59.6%. The most frequent gene was aac(6’)-Ib-cr (n = 70, 55.6%), followed by the qnrB (n = 44, 34.9%. Conclusions: This study showed a high prevalence of qnr genes in ESBL-producing K. pneumonia isolates and antibiotic resistance. Given the horizontal transmission of antibiotic resistance genes among bacteria by mobile genetic elements, timely identification of infections caused by ESBL-producing and antimicrobial-resistant K. pneumonia strains is of paramount importance.
Background One of the most important routes of HIV transmission is through injections of drugs, and this group, due to unawareness of their infection, causes the spread of HIV. The coexistence of other opportunistic infections and diseases with HIV among people who inject drugs (PWID) imposes healthcare costs and is associated with high morbidity/mortality rates. Early detection of HIV among PWID is essential to prevent and control the spread of the disease. Objectives This study aimed to determine the prevalence of PWID among those with late presentation (LP). Methods Three electronic databases of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of science were searched using appropriate keywords. Besides the prevalence data reported for PWID among LP, the other outcomes of interest were LP defined as having CD4 count < 350 cells/μL or HIV or advanced disease defined with CD4 count < 200 cells/μL or HIV at the time of diagnosis. Results Of the 160 studies found, only eight met the inclusion criteria. Among those presented late, 36.5% were PWID (95% CI = 24.88–48.17). Compared with men who have sex with men (MSM), HIV-infected PWID had a higher risk of LP [OR = 1.51; 95% CI = 0.96–2.06]. Conclusion The results of this study show that HIV is diagnosed late in the majority of PWID when CD4 is less than 350 cells/μL. Targeted interventions/strategies are highly required to reduce LP among HIV-infected PWID.
Background: Integrons are known as mobile genetic elements (MGEs) with their own effects on transferring antibiotic resistance genes among bacteria. Objectives: The main purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of class I and II integrons in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) isolates in the city of Kermanshah, Iran. Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 86 isolates of S. aureus were collected and verified using specific biochemical tests, and then examined for antibiotic susceptibility by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. The frequency of class I and II integrons was also determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and specific primers. Results: The frequency percentages of class I and II integrons were 47.7% (n = 41 isolates) and 17.4% (n = 15 isolates), respectively. A statistically significant relationship was observed between the frequency of class I and II integrons and resistance to some antibiotics (P < 0.05). In the MRSA isolates, the most antibiotic resistance was to penicillin (100%) and gentamicin (80%) and the most antibiotic sensitivity was to vancomycin (100%) and linezolid (96.5%). Conclusions: Due to the frequency of the integrons in resistant strains of S. aureus, as well as the possibility of rapid transfer of these agents among the isolates, we are in dire need of continuous monitoring of resistance patterns and selection of appropriate antibiotics using the phenotypic and genotypic resistance measurements taken by hospital laboratories to reduce and control antibiotic resistance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.