No abstract

Background Lesions associated with the biceps tendon are commonly detected during arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears. Acquiring a preferable technique to repair both cuff and long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) lesions was the aim of several recent studies. This study aimed to compare clinical and functional outcomes of open subpectoral versus arthroscopic intraarticular tenodesis in patients with repairable rotator cuff tear associated with LHBT degeneration. Patients and methods In this randomized clinical trial, 60 eligible candidates for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (mean age 55.7 ± 6.9 years) were allocated to a control group (open subpectoral, SP) or intervention group (intraarticular, IA). In the IA group, an anchor suture was used for both rotator cuff repair and LHBT tenodesis. In the SP group, after arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff, subpectoral tenodesis of LHBT was performed using an interference screw. Patients were evaluated for 2 years follow-up regarding pain intensity using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and shoulder function using the Constant Score and Simple Shoulder Test. Results The two groups were similar with regard to demographic characteristics and preoperative evaluations (all P > 0.05). The functional status of both groups was improved, but not significantly differently so between the two groups ( P = 0.1 and P = 0.4, respectively). Pain intensity decreased during the 2-year follow-up period, similarly so in the two groups. Patient satisfaction was also similar in the two groups. Conclusion Large and massive rotator cuff tears (tears > 3 cm) associated with LHBT pathologies benefited from intraarticular or subpectoral tenodesis similarly, with no differences in short- or mid-term results between these two techniques. Level of evidence II.

Purpose Recent studies have shown that several genetic factors can cause susceptibility to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. The aim of the present study was to evaluate certain underlying factors that increase the risk of ACL rupture. Methods Eight hundred thirty‐six patients with ACL rupture who underwent ACL reconstructive surgery from 2010 to 2013 at an academic center completed a minimum of 5 years post‐operation follow‐up. The collected variables included sex, age, height, weight, exercise level, time interval between ACL rupture in the first knee and contralateral ACL rupture, dominant leg, side of the involved knee and sibling history of ACL rupture. Results The median follow‐up duration was 6.5 (range: 5–8) years. Eighty‐three patients (9.9%) had a contralateral ACL rupture, and 155 patients (18.5%) had siblings with a history of ACL rupture. The rate of contralateral ACL rupture was three times higher in women than in men and in patients with siblings with a history of ACL rupture than in those without such history. In addition, the risk of contralateral ACL rupture was higher in those younger than 30 years of age, those with a BMI of 20–25 kg/m2 and those who participated in regular sports activity. However, whether the involved knee was on the dominant or nondominant side had no effect on the incidence of contralateral ACL rupture. The results of the study showed that 69 (83.1%) of the contralateral ACL ruptures occurred within the first 2 years after the primary operation. Conclusion In a 5‐ to 8‐year follow‐up, one out of every ten patients had a contralateral ACL rupture, and two out of every ten patients had siblings with a history of ACL rupture. The findings suggest that having a sibling with a history of ACL rupture and being female are important risk factors for ACL rupture of the contralateral knee. Level of evidence III