No abstract

Chronic blepharitis and decreased tear secretion are the 2 most important and influencing factors in progression of ocular problems in SM injuries. The more severe the initial exposure, percentage of disability, and duration of ocular involvement, the higher the likelihood of mustard gas keratopathy.

Purpose To evaluate the disinfectant properties of the three multipurpose contact lens disinfecting solutions available in Iran, against clinical isolates and the standard ISO ATCC strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, based on the international organization for standardization (ISO) 14729 guidelines. Methods Three multipurpose solutions that were tested were ReNu Multiplus, Solo Care Aqua and All-Clean Soft. The test solutions were challenged with clinical isolates and the standard strains of P. aeruginosa (ATCC 9027) and S. aureus (ATCC 6538), based on the ISO Stand-alone procedure for disinfecting products. Solutions were sampled for surviving microorganisms at manufacturer's minimum recommended disinfection time. The number of viable organisms was determined and log reductions calculated. Results All of the three test solutions in this study provided a reduction greater than the required mean 3.0 logarithmic reduction against the recommended standard ATCC strains of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. Antibacterial effectiveness of Solo Care Aqua and All-Clean Soft against clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus were acceptable based on ISO 14729 Stand-alone test. ReNu MultiPlus showed a minimum acceptable efficacy against the clinical isolate of S. aureus, but did not reduce the clinical isolate by the same amount. Conclusions Although the contact lens disinfecting solutions meet/exceed the ISO 14729 Stand-alone primary acceptance criteria for standard strains of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, their efficacy may be insufficient against clinical isolates of these organisms.

Eyes are very sensitive to sulfur mustard (SM) gas because they have wet surfaces. The severity of ocular damage is related to the dose and duration of exposure to SM, and recovery may take up to several years after the exposure. We conducted a large cohort study to evaluate the ocular signs and symptoms of 367 chemical war victims in Sardasht City, Iran, 20 years after their exposure to mustard gas. The results of these chemical war victims (i.e., the cases) were compared with the results for 128 unaffected civilians (i.e., the controls). Photophobia was the most significant symptom in the cases (36.8%) (compared with 20.3% in the controls) (p < or = .001). Ocular surface discomfort (burning, itching, and redness) was the second most significant symptom in the cases (29.2%) (compared with 19.5% in the controls) (p = .034). Other symptoms such as foreign-body sensation, tearing, pain, blurring of vision, and dry eye sensation were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In the slit-lamp findings, bulbar conjunctival abnormality was the most significant sign in the cases (9.3%) (compared with 1.6% in the controls) (p = .004). Limbal tissue changes were the second most significant sign in the cases (3.0%) (compared with 0.0% in the controls) (p = .048). Other slit-lamp findings related to tearing and abnormalities in the lids and cornea were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Our findings in the present study showed that photophobia and ocular surface discomfort (burning, itching, and redness) were the most significant symptoms. In addition, bulbar conjunctival abnormalities and limbal tissue changes were the most significant signs among the sulfur mustard chemical war victims.

No abstract