This paper employs GRS test to empirically compare the applicability of five alternatives of asset pricing models for 55 shares listed on the EGX100 for the Egyptian stock market: 1) the CAPM, 2) the Fama-French three factor model, 3) the Cahart four factor model, 4) liquidity-augmented four factor model, 5) and the five factor model (liquidity and momentum-augmented Fama-French three factor model. The sample is split into six portfolios sorted on size and book-to market ratio and 45 shares are excluded due to data unavailability. Our results based on GRS (1989) show evidence that Fama-French model is the best and reject the other models.

The study aims at executing five tantamount asset pricing models in Egypt, in particular: 1) “the CAPM”, 2) “the Fama-French three-factor model (1993)”, 3) “the Carhart model (1997)”, 4) “the four-factor model of Chan and Faff (2005)”, and 5) “the five-factor model (Liquidity and Momentum-Augmented Fama-French three factor model)”. This research effort pursues Fama-French arranging approach in view of the size and Book-to-Market proportion (B-M ratio) for 55 securities out of the most 100 stocks in the Egyptian Stock Exchange (EGX) over a five years’ time period. We utilized “the time series regression of Black, Jensen and Scholes (1972)”. The findings of the study revealed that in terms of predictability, FF three-factor model prompts a significant improvement over the CAPM, while alternate models do not demonstrate a noteworthy increment over the FF three factor model.

No abstract

No abstract

This paper is an attempt to investigate the relation of financial anomalies, namely size, book-to-market and turn-of-the-year and their relation with risk and average return in the Egyptian stock market from 2003 to 2007. The sample consists of 55 stocks listed on the EGX100 and split into six portfolios sorted on size and book-to-market ratio based on Fama-French (1992) technique. The results show evidence that there is negative relationship between size and average return, and between value and average return for small stocks. Also, both size and book-to-market have negative relation with risk.

No abstract