Introduction and Objectives: A comparative study of standard radical cystectomy and prostate capsule sparing radical cystectomy regarding functional and oncological outcomes. Materials and Methods: A randomized study of 96 patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder (December 2014 - June 2016) was done. We excluded cases with preoperative T4 staging, lymphadenopathy, prostatic specific antigen > 4 ng/dl, and cases with positive biopsies from the bladder neck, trigone, and/or prostatic urethra. Patients were divided into 2 groups, Group 1: standard radical cystectomy with orthotopic diversion (n = 51), Group 2: prostate capsule sparing cystectomy with orthotopic diversion (n = 45). Preoperative transrectal ultrasound and prostatic biopsies were done in Group 2 to exclude prostate cancer. We compared the urinary continence and erectile function in both groups after 6 months, 1, and 2 years. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups regarding preoperative demographic data, tumor stage, grade, site by cystoscopy, and biopsy. Intraoperative monitoring showed no significant differences regarding blood loss, surgical complications, or operative time (2.5 ± 0.48 vs. 2.4 ± 0.45 h). There was a significantly higher percentage of continence and potency in Group 2 than in Group 1. Sixteen cases (35.6%) in Group 2 but only 4 cases (7.8%) in Group 1 developed large post-voiding residual urine and needed intermittent self-catheterization cleaning (p = 0.001). The tumor recurrence rate was not significantly different between the groups after 2 years (p = 0.3). Conclusion: Prostate capsule sparing cystectomy is a good option in selected cases with better continence and potency and without compromising oncological outcomes after 2 years.
The purpose of this study was to report a surgical technique for closure of a traumatic corneal perforation in a patient with healthy endothelium.Methods: A 69-year-old male patient presented to Southend University Hospital with a 2.5 mm round temporal corneal perforation caused by a metallic foreign body from an industrial accident. Best-corrected visual acuity at presentation was 6/36. The patient received a tectonic small diameter Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (mini-DSAEK) to close the perforation. The patient subsequently developed traumatic cataract and underwent cataract surgery 8 months later. Clinical outcomes at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months were evaluated. The primary outcomes of interest were successful sustained closure of the perforation and surgical complications, with secondary outcomes of best-spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA, Snellen) and keratometric astigmatism (KA, Pentacam). Results:The anterior chamber was reformed by the graft, restoring the globe's mechanical integrity. The bare stroma reepithelized by 1 week. Neither intraoperative nor postoperative surgical complications were reported. The anterior chamber remained deep and formed during subsequent follow-ups through 9 months. At the 9-month follow-up, final best spectaclecorrected visual acuity was 6/6-1 (Snellen fraction). Keratometric astigmatism was 1.1 diopters.Conclusions: Tectonic mini-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty is a safe technique in the management of corneal perforations too large for tissue adhesives, with a low astigmatic profile and rapid visual recovery.
Purpose: To describe a surgical technique to achieve the desired plane during deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in eyes with Descemet membrane (DM) tears due to previous hydrops. Methods: This was a prospective, consecutive, interventional case series of DALK in 12 keratoconic eyes with healed hydrops. Dissection of the peripheral cornea was performed by air injection and using the microbubble incision technique as a guide to the clear predescemetic stroma. The central posterior scar was then removed by peeling to bare DM. Results: DALK was successfully completed in all eyes, with DM tears ranging from a microperforation to approximately 4 mm. At 12 months, the mean logMAR best-corrected visual acuity was 0.38 ± 0.07, the mean keratometric astigmatism was 5.2 ± 1.9 diopters, and the mean endothelial cell density was 2364 ± 316.9 cells/mm2. Conclusions: Peripheral pneumatic dissection and central scar peeling technique is a useful technique to complete DALK in eyes with scars due to previous hydrops.
Purpose To report the outcomes of a new technique, pull-through sutureless ‘mini-DSAEK’, to manage corneal perforations secondary to different aetiologies including trauma, neurotrophic ulcer following penetrating keratoplasty (PK), herpes simplex keratitis and microbial keratitis. Methods In this retrospective case series, we report the clinical outcomes of five cases of sutureless tectonic mini-DSAEK performed in patients presenting with large corneal perforations to Southend University Hospital between November 2019 and October 2020. One corneal perforation was sufficiently peripheral for the tectonic mini-DSAEK graft to be successfully positioned outside of the central visual axis. Four corneal perforations were central or paracentral for which the tectonic grafts involved the visual axis. Results Anterior chambers remained deep and formed with no evidence of leak in all subsequent follow ups in all patients representing 100% tectonic success. All tectonic grafts remained attached except one partially detached graft. One patient underwent uneventful phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implant 8 months after the primary intervention with excellent visual outcome. Two patients underwent two-piece mushroom PK and one patient underwent triple procedure (cataract extraction + intraocular lens + PK) for visual rehabilitation 2–6 months after the primary intervention with good visual outcome. Conclusion Sutureless tectonic pull-through mini-DSAEK is a useful technique in the management of corneal perforations, with a number of advantages compared with conventional techniques.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.