Objective To review published reports of surgically treated adrenal myelolipomas and report experience with a further eight cases. Patients and methods Eight patients (three men and five women, mean age 50.7 years) with adrenal myelolipoma were treated surgically because of the tumour size, symptomatology and/or associated renal pathology. Associated medical problems included hypertension in three patients and diabetes mellitus in one but none of the tumours was endocrinologically active. Results Five patients were diagnosed definitively by abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography and angiography while the other three were incidentally diagnosed during surgical intervention for ipsilateral renal cell carcinoma in one patient, hydronephrotic kidney in another and multiple renal stones in the third. On pathological examination, the masses removed were surrounded by a thin fibrous capsule and compressed cortical tissue. A cut section was bright yellow with foci of red‐brown discoloration. Microscopically, the tumour consisted mainly of mature adipose tissue with scattered islands of haemopoietic cells. There was no operative mortality and no gross morbidity. Conclusion The management of adrenal myelolipoma should be appropriate to each individual case. Operative intervention should be reserved for symptomatic patients or those with large ‘silent’ tumours that may produce life‐threatening shock secondary to spontaneous haemorrhage. Small asymptomatic tumours with definite radiological findings can be followed expectantly.

No abstract

Background One year has passed since the announcement of COVID-19 as a pandemic and two waves had already stricken Egypt. The authors witnessed several atypical radiological features through the second pandemic wave, either early at the active infective stage or delayed at the post-infectious convalescent period. They believed every radiologist should be familiar with these features. Therefore, they performed this comparative study on 2000 Egyptian patients using multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) to highlight the radiological differences between the first and second pandemic waves and correlate them to the clinical status. Results This random multi-center comparative study was retrospectively conducted on 2000 COVID-19 Egyptian patients; 1000 patients were registered at the first pandemic wave from April 2020 till September 2020, while the other 1000 patients were registered at the second pandemic wave from October 2020 till March 2020. Follow up CT examinations were performed for 49 and 122 patients through the first and second pandemic waves respectively. MSCT examinations were carefully evaluated by four expert consulting radiologists who came to a consensus. Meanwhile, the correlation with the clinical outcome was performed by two consulting pulmonologists. During the second pandemic wave, the prevalence rate of the “crazy-paving” pattern had significantly increased by 1.3 times (P value = 0.002). Additionally, the prevalence rate of the “air-bubble” sign had significantly increased by 1.9 times (P value = 0.02). Similarly, the presence of enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes (> 1 cm in short-axis diameter) had significantly increased by 1.7 times (P value = 0.036). Furthermore, the prevalence rate of pericardial effusion had significantly increased by 2.5 times (P value = 0.003). The above-mentioned signs were correlated to increased clinical severity and higher rates of hospitalization. Unexpectedly, other atypical radiological signs were only encountered through the second pandemic wave, including bronchiectatic changes (2.5%), “head-cheese” pattern (0.8%), cavitation (0.5%), and “bulls-eye” sign (0.2%). The prevalence rate of post-COVID fibrosis had doubled through the second wave but not in a significant way (P value = 0.234). Secondary fungal infection was only encountered throughout the second pandemic wave in four patients. COVID-19 reinfection was encountered in a single patient only during the second pandemic wave. Conclusion After 1 year from the announcement of COVID-19 as a pandemic, the radiological presentation of COVID-19 patients showed some significant differences between its first and second waves.

No abstract

Background Pituitary stalk interruption syndrome (PSIS) is one of the rare endocrinal aetiologies of the abnormal short stature. This is a syndrome characterized by a specific tirade, an absent or hypoplastic anterior pituitary gland, thin or absent infundibulum, and ectopic posterior pituitary location. This type of pituitary dwarfism is usually presented in the first decade of life and may be first isolated with normal other pituitary hormones. Results Only 3 out of 117 dwarf patients (2.5%) were found to have pituitary stalk interruption syndrome. Conclusion Although of rare incidence, pituitary stalk interruption syndrome (PSIS) is an entity which leads to pituitary dwarfism and should be kept in mind while investigating a child with pituitary dwarfism and radiologists should be aware of its rarely encountered diagnostic MRI findings for early diagnosis and treatment.