Area strain represents a promising novel automatic index that may provide an accurate and reproducible alternative to current echocardiographic standards for quantitative assessment of global and regional LV function. Area strain seems to adequately identify regional wall motion abnormalities compared with the clinical standard of visual assessment by experienced echocardiographers.

Good intra-observer, inter-observer, and test-retest reliability support the use of three-dimensional STE for routine evaluation of LV volumes and EF. Global and segmental circumferential strain measurements also demonstrate high reliability, whereas analysis by a single observer is currently recommended for longitudinal and radial strain due to limited inter-observer and test-retest reliability.

No abstract

Although 3DSTE-derived LV volumes are underestimated in most patients compared with MRI, measurement of the LVEF revealed excellent accuracy. Measurements of CS were systematically greater (i.e. more negative) with 3DSTE than MRI, which likely reflects various inter-technique differences that preclude direct comparability of their measurements.

3DE is a feasible and reliable tool for assessment of LV dyssynchrony and may have additional value to current selection criteria for accurate prediction of response to CRT.