No abstract

We report our experience with potential donors for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), which is the first report from an area where there is no legalized deceased donation program. This is a single center retrospective analysis of potential living donors (n = 1004) between May 2004 and December 2012. This report focuses on the analysis of causes, duration, cost, and various implications of donor exclusion (n = 792). Most of the transplant candidates (82.3%) had an experience with more than one excluded donor (median = 3). Some recipients travelled abroad for a deceased donor transplant (n = 12) and some died before finding a suitable donor (n = 14). The evaluation of an excluded donor is a time-consuming process (median = 3 d, range 1 d to 47 d). It is also a costly process with a median cost of approximately 70 USD (range 35 USD to 885 USD). From these results, living donor exclusion has negative implications on the patients and transplant program with ethical dilemmas and an economic impact. Many strategies are adopted by other centers to expand the donor pool; however, they are not all applicable in our locality. We conclude that an active legalized deceased donor transplantation program is necessary to overcome the shortage of available liver grafts in Egypt.

No abstract

Living donor liver transplantation has shorter cold ischemia time, less preservative volume, and lower metabolic load compared to transplantation from deceased donors. We investigated the impact of rinsing the graft contents into the systemic circulation on operative course and postoperative outcomes. Donors had right hepatectomy, and grafts were preserved with cold histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution. On ending portal vein anastomosis, grafts were flushed by patient's portal blood either through incompletely anastomosed hepatic vein (extracorporeal rinse group, EcRg, n = 40) or into systemic circulation (circulatory rinse group, CRg, n = 40). The primary outcome objective was the lowest mean arterial blood pressure within 5 min after portal unclamping as a marker for postreperfusion syndrome (PRS). Secondary objectives included hemodynamics and early graft's and patient's outcomes. Within 5 min postreperfusion, mean arterial blood pressure was significantly lower in the CRg compared to the EcRg, yet this was clinically insignificant. Postoperative graft functions, early biliary and vascular complications, and three-month survival were comparable in both groups. Rinsing the graft into the circulation increased the incidence of PRS without significant impact on early graft or patient outcome in relatively healthy recipients.

No abstract