Aim:The Covid-19 pandemic has delayed elective colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. The aim of this study was to see whether or not this may affect overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).Method: A systematic review was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020189158). Medline, EMBASE and Scopus were interrogated. Patients aged over 18 years with a diagnosis of colon or rectal cancer who received elective surgery as their primary treatment were included. Delay to elective surgery was defined as the period between CRC diagnosis and the day of surgery. Meta-analysis of the outcomes OS and DFS were conducted. Forest plots, funnel plots and tests of heterogeneity were produced. An estimated number needed to harm (NNH) was calculated for statistically significant pooled hazard ratios (HRs).Results: Of 3753 articles identified, seven met the inclusion criteria. Encompassing 314 560 patients, three of the seven studies showed that a delay to elective resection is associated with poorer OS or DFS. OS was assessed at a 1 month delay, the HR for six datasets was 1.13 (95% CI 1.02-1.26, p = 0.020) and at 3 months the pooled HR for three datasets was 1.57 (95% CI 1.16-2.12, p = 0.004). The estimated NNH for a delay at 1 month and 3 months was 35 and 10 respectively. Delay was nonsignificantly negatively associated with DFS on meta-analysis. Conclusion:This review recommends that elective surgery for CRC patients is not postponed longer than 4 weeks, as available evidence suggests extended delays from diagnosis are associated with poorer outcomes. Focused research is essential so patient groups can be prioritized based on risk factors in future delays or pandemics.
Whilst the use of various blended learning models preceded the COVID-19 pandemic, the abrupt shift to remote delivery served as catalyst within the sector in enhancing digital solutions to meet immediate student needs. As we emerge from the pandemic, a return to purely didactic and impersonal in-person teaching seems anticlimactic, with the return to the lecture theatre seeing many lecturers trialling various digital tools in creating more interactive in-person, synchronous, and asynchronous sessions. In evaluating students' experiences of the various tools and approaches applied by academic staff, a survey was developed by a multidisciplinary team of educators at Cardiff University's School of Medicine exploring student perceptions of e-learning resources (ELRs), as well as student experiences of various blended learning approaches. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate student experience, satisfaction, and engagement with ELRs and blended learning. A total of 179 students (undergraduate and postgraduate) completed the survey. 97% confirmed that e-learning resources were blended within the teaching they received, with 77% rating the quality of e-learning as good-to-excellent and 66% reporting a preference for asynchronous resources that enable them to learn at their own pace. A variety of platforms, tools, and approaches were identified by students as meeting their diverse learning needs. We therefore propose a personalised, evidencebased and inclusive learning (PEBIL) model enabling the application of digital technologies both on and offline.
Background COVID-19 is a disease of varying presentation and neurological sequelae of the disease are being studied. Following a cluster of paediatric facial nerve palsy (FNP) cases in an area of South Wales with a high prevalence of COVID-19, we conducted an opportunistic study to determine whether there has been an increase of incidence of FNP and if there is an association between the FNP and COVID-19 in children. Methods We performed a retrospective review of the incidence of FNP between 2015 and 2020 across two hospitals within the health board. The incidence was compared with that in 2020 including a cluster of six children in 14 weeks, presenting to Royal Glamorgan Hospital between June and October. Results There were 48 cases of children with FNP across both hospital within the study years. Seven (7) cases in 2020. The incidence was not statistically different in comparison to other years. Five out of six of these children in 2020 had antibody testing for COVID-19. All serology testing (100%) returned negative for SARS-CoV- 2 antibodies. Conclusions In high prevalence area for COVID-19, cases of children with FNP have not shown a commensurate increase. we have found no causal link between COVID-19 and FNP in children. While this is a small study, larger cohort studies are needed to support this finding. As new strains of COVID-19 are being reported in UK, South Africa and Brazil, physicians need to continue to be vigilant for consistent pattern of signs and symptoms, especially in children.
AimsPrenatal adversity is hypothesized to increase risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) via epigenetic changes. Maternal stress in late pregnancy may alter offspring neurodevelopmental outcomes by disrupting a unique period of rapid neurogenesis. Observational studies reporting an environmentally mediated programming pathway face challenges in drawing causal inferences including passive gene-environment correlation. This project aims to use a quasi-experimental genetically informed design to assess if reported correlations between maternal prenatal stress and offspring ASD traits were due to maternally inherited factors or consistent with a potentially causal prenatal exposure effect. No previous cross-fostering studies have assessed the effects of prenatal stress on childhood ASD.MethodThis study used an in-vitro fertilization cross-fostering sample with pregnant mothers related (n = 365) or unrelated (n = 111) to their offspring (mean age = 9.84 years). Prenatal stress was assessed using a subjective Likert scale during pregnancy. Questionnaires examined maternally rated offspring ASD traits using the Social and Communication Disorders Checklist. Birth weight and gestational age from medical records were used as comparison outcomes to validate the measure of stress as evidence suggests they are influenced by environmental factors. Correlations from multiple regression models were examined in relation to magnitude of effect size as well as significance. This is partly due to small sample size and that cross-fostering designs rely on comparing magnitudes of associations between related and unrelated groups. An interaction term was used to test the difference in the strength of association between related and unrelated mother-child groups.ResultSubjective assessment of prenatal maternal stress showed construct validity as it was associated with low birth weight (β = –0.297, p = 0.005) and reduced gestational age (β= –0.320, p = 0.001). Subjective late pregnancy stress was associated with increased offspring ASD traits in the whole sample (β = 0.089, p = 0.073) and in the related (β=0.045, p = 0.424) and unrelated mother-child (β=0.233, p = 0.029) subgroups. Non-significant interaction terms demonstrated that the mechanisms underlying the association between maternal stress and ASD and birth outcomes are likely to be similar and environmentally driven in the different conception groups.ConclusionFindings demonstrate the utility of genetically informed designs in disentangling inherited factors from environmental influences in the study of prenatal risk factors. Correlations between maternal prenatal stress and offspring ASD being present in both related and unrelated mother-child groups indicate an environmental link that is consistent with a potential causal effect. Associations detected are of imperative use for clinicians and policymakers, as they can guide the implementation of early psychosocial care for families at high liability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.