This quantitative study aims to identify the mastery level of Arabic academic vocabulary (AAV) as well as to identify differences in AAV mastery among students between six public universities in Malaysia using receptive and productive AAV test instruments. Researchers constructed AAV test questions based on the test format introduced by Schmitt (2000) with some modifications. A total number of 50 academic vocabularies were filtered from the Academic Word List (AWL) proposed by Davies and Gardner (2013) and was tested on 126 samples through purposive sampling. The data from the test were analysed descriptively using Microsoft Excel 2016 software and SPSS V25.0. The results of the study found that the overall mastery of AAV among Malaysian Public Universities (MPU) students is at a moderate level with a mean score of 66%. In addition, there is a significant gap in the mean percentage in AAV mastery, namely IIUM which recorded the highest level (mean = 88%), while UiTM has the lowest value (mean = 54%). The results of the Kruskal-Wallis test showed that there was a significant difference in AAV mastery among students between the public universities. The post-hoc Bonferroni test also recorded the same which the value of p = <0.05.
This study falls under discourse analysis studies, focusing on using the academic register in Arabic research articles. Language register refers to using a form of language in a specific context. The use of language register varies according to the structure of discourse and field. For example, language register is used in scientific discourse, entertainment, politics, and health. Using accurate and appropriate scientific language in terms of vocabulary can demonstrate the strength of an article in reporting research results. The current study was conducted to identify the use of the academic register in Arabic via research articles focusing on academic vocabulary. This study was prompted by several issues, such as the weakness of students and researchers in producing quality research reports from the aspect of scientific writing, in addition to the limited number of studies about the academic language register in Arabic. This study was descriptive, using a qualitative approach and content analysis techniques. The unit analyzed was academic vocabulary words taken from six journal articles on Arabic language issues. All articles were written by native Arabic speakers and published by the Arabic journal “al-Majallah al-Urduniyyah fi al-Ulum al-Tarbawiyyah” in Jordan. The academic language register was analyzed using the approach of Ure and Ellis (1977). It was based on the 100 academic vocabulary words (Academic Vocabulary List or AVL) generated by Gardner and Davies (2014). The study's results found that all the suggested words from the AVL were used by Arabic-language researchers in writing their articles with various frequencies. Out of the 100 words selected from the AVL, 71 to 90 vocabulary words were used in each article. The most used word was the word دِرَاسَة which appeared 464 times, but the word شَجَّعَ appeared only 3 times, the lowest frequency.
A language is a communication tool that has many functions. In academic writing, language performs certain functions, such as providing information, analyzing, comparing, and categorizing. Quality academic writing should show proper educational function through accurate and appropriate language. This study investigated academic language functions in Arabic language research articles. This study is based on several issues, such as the weaknesses of students and researchers in producing quality research reports, the need to understand the diversity of the academic language function in Arabic, as well as the lack of studies in the literary language based on the function of the academic language in Arabic. This study uses the descriptive qualitative approach and content analysis method. The analyzed content was sentenced that contained academic language functions. Sentences containing academic language functions were taken from 30 research articles in the field of Arabic written by native Arabic speakers. The analysis of language functions in the study was done using 12 academic language functions by Chamot and O'Malley (1994) and Dutro and Muran (2003). The study results found that writers use various academic functions to achieve the desired purpose. Various language registers are used for the function to be presented. Similarly, the use of language functions was also influenced by multiple aspects such as the research components (problem statement, objectives, etc), factors of the type of study (quantitative and qualitative), and others. For example, predicting and hypothesizing functions and problem-solving functions are more likely to be used in quantitative studies. This differs from qualitative studies that use other functions, such as informing and summarizing. In conclusion, the writers were seen to be successful in conveying the function of academic language in their writing by using appropriate vocabulary and sentences according to the function they wanted to share.
The issue of learning Arabic among university students is closely related to the mastery of Arabic academic vocabulary (AAV). This study aimed to investigate the mastery of the receptive and productive Arabic academic vocabulary amongst Malaysian Public Universities students. 126 Arabic students from 6 public universities have been selected via purposive sampling method. In order to collect the data, researchers used a set of receptive and productive academic vocabulary tests. 50 academic vocabularies have been used from a list of academic vocabulary provided by Davies and Gardner (2013). The research data were analysed using SPSS v25 (Shapiro-Wilk Test, Kruskal-Wallis Test and Post-Hoc Bonferroni Test). The results shows that the productive test scored higher compared to the results of the receptive test. The findings showed that there are significant differences as compared to the findings of previous vocabulary studies where almost all earlier research indicates that receptive test achievement is usually better than productive test achievement. Researchers argue that this is probably due to the more difficult academic vocabulary features, the number of words used in receptive questions is more than productive tests as well as a less effective test formats to be applied to Arabic language learners as foreign languages. Contribution/ Originality:The main finding of this study is that the achievement of productive academic vocabulary is higher than the achievement of receptive vocabulary among students who are learning Arabic as a foreign language. This finding is slightly different from the previous studies conducted among native speaker students. Since academic vocabulary is more technical in nature, it is possible that appropriate test should be used for foreign languages.
Rhetoric is one of the beautiful arts of expression in Arabic. Unfortunately, many students who learn Arabic Rhetoric are unable to acquire it well due to the lack of interesting materials. Past studies revealed that the mastery level of Arabic Rhetoric among secondary school students is at a moderate level. Therefore, the development of an Arabic Rhetoric application through Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) should be implemented in facilitating students to understand the concept of Arabic Rhetoric more effectively. Factors such as elaboration of contents via graphics, animation, audios, videos, and texts followed by the provision of exercises may attract students to learn independently as well as to improve their performance. This quantitative study aims to analyze the need for an Arabic Rhetorical application. The respondents comprised 40 form four students enrolled in a secondary school in Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. A questionnaire with a reliability value of 0.931 was administered online via Google Form. It consisted of four sections: i) demographics, ii) Arabic Rhetoric learning approaches, iii) Arabic Rhetoric learning issues, and iv) innovation design in Arabic Rhetoric learning. The analysis of data was conducted via descriptive statistics through percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The findings show that students need innovative design in learning Arabic Rhetoric through an Arabic Rhetorical application in order to facilitate the comprehension of information.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.