In developing a good legal system, three important variables are needed to drive its legitimacy, namely law making, law administrating and law enforcing. In the reformulation of the KPK Law, a delegitimization process towards both law administrating and law enforcing. Whereas, law making as a legal policy must be able to sustain these two variables in order to work complementarily. The passing of the KPK Law is precisely procedural flawed as a result of the delegitimative political configuration regime towards eradicating corruption. Therefore, this paper would like to understand the existence of the KPK in the corridors of anti-corruption policy and the conditions of corruption eradication in Indonesia after the enactment of the KPK Law. The result of the discussion explained that there are several contradictiory articles, the unclear position of the KPK between an independent institution or a subordinate body of executive power, ambigous position of the supervisory board, wiretapping misconceptions, domestication of investigators and employees to become civil servants, police investigator under the coordination of his home institution, authority to determine SP3 for two years. As for what can be done to address these problems is through formal review in the constitutional court and through issued by the president.
Systems regarding the legal remedy of communication interception can be found in several regulations. However, those systems are not supported by horizontal harmonization since each regulation governs the mechanism differently, so there is a disparity among interception regulation. This paper analyzes the harmonization of wiretapping regulations in Indonesia from a law enforcement perspective with an inventory of regulations governing the current mechanism of interception. The results concluded that first, the disparity in intercepting authority of communication interception practice regulated by several institutions in the same form of crime eradication authority must be reformulated to restore overlapping regulations. Secondly, the interception regulation as a coercive force that derogates the right to privacy must contain detailed provisions in terms of a permit request and the wiretapping authority. The permit application must contain the purpose of the request for wiretapping permission descriptively. Moreover, these provisions must explicitly regulate legal subjects that are authorized to conduct wiretapping practice in the form of clear mechanisms and coordination with the direct superiors and court supervision regulating the interception procedure as well as the cooperation between law enforcement officials and telecommunications service providers. Third, prospectively interception regulations can be assessed from the political will of the legislators. The decision of the Constitutional Court No. 5/PUU-VIII/2010 mandates the need for horizontal harmonization of interception regulations in the form of the Interception Bill, which is also included in the 2019 National Legislation Program.
Abstrak:Problem mendasar yang menyebabkan terjadinya overcrowded di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan tidak lepas dari paradigma pemidanaan yang masih berorientasi retributive justice. Kebijakan kriminal yang didesain pasca reformasi justru masih terjebak pada paradigma pidana penjara sebagai bentuk paling efektif dan rasional dalam fungsi kontrol sosial. Hal ini dapat dilihat dari masifnya ancaman pidana dalam rentang 1998-2014 sehingga terkesan overkriminalistik. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini ingin menelaah proyeksi kebijakan kriminal yang dapat menekan laju pertumbuhan overcrowded di Lapas. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga membahas grand design kebijakan kriminal di bawah naungan Kementerian Hukum dan HAM dalam menanggulangi kondisi overcrowded Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Sifat penelitian adalah deskriptif, analitik dan preskriptif. Sumber data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tren kriminalisasi mengarah pada overkriminalisasi dengan dominasi ancaman pidana penjara. Kebijakan tersebut sangat berperan bagi laju pertumbuhan overcrowded. Proyeksi yang dibangun untuk menanggulanginya adalah konsep individualisasi pidana dalam RKUHP, diversi dan mediasi penal, subsidairitas terbalik pada model pemidanaan yang mengutamakan ultimum remedium, berkembangnya pola pembinaan extramural treatment dan sinkronisasi regulasi terkait. Adapun grand design yang dibangun adalah perlunya segera dilakukan sinkronisasi regulasi terkait tata kelola dan manajemen pegawai, penguatan kelembagaan di bawah kendali Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan, memperkuat peran penelitian masyarakat dan pola pembinaan ke arah extramural treatment. Abstract:The fundamental problem that causes overcrowding at the correctional institution cannot be separated from the sentencing paradigm which is still retributive justice oriented. The criminal policy designed after the reformation period is still trapped in the paradigm of imprisonment as the most effective and rational form in the function of social control. This matter can be seen from the nature of the imprisonment in the range 1998-2014 so that, it seems overcriminalistic.Threfore, the aim of this research is to review criminal policy projections that can reduce the growth of overcrowding at the correctional institution. This research also discusses the grand design of criminal policy under the authority of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights in tackling overcrowding at the correctional institution. This research is qualitative research with a juridical normative approach. The nature of this research are descriptive, analytic and prescriptive methode. The source of data uses secondary data with the composition of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The result of this research show that criminalization trends are overcriminalistic with the dominance of imprisonment. These trends have an impact on the overcrowded growth rate. Projections that built to reduce it are the concept of individualization in criminal punishment, diversion and mediation program, subsidiarity of sentencing model to prioritize ultimum remedium, extramural treatment as the progressive treatment for prisoners and regulatory synchronization on criminal regulations. Grand designs that have been developed are necessary to synchronize regulations related to the correctional administration, institutional management, strengthen institution under the authority of the directorate general of correction, strengthen the role of community research and to develop extramural treatment.
This paper will discuss Islamic Religious Education and internalization of anti-corruption values as the effort to prevent corruption. The effort to overcome corruption crime not only with prosecution and eradication, but also with prevention efforts. One of the prevention efforts is education. Therefore, it needs anti-corruption education model as the resistence efforts toward corruptive behavior and to internalize the value of morality. It has to do literatively to build anti-corruption view. The aim of this paper is to understand integration of anti-corruption values in Islamic Religious Education model. Furthermore, this paper also discusses transformation of Islamic Religious Education that integrating anti-corruption values as the prevention efforts of widespread corruptive behavior and to increase corruption perception index. In this case, Islamic Religious Education must be able to make a methodological transformation in terms of cognitive anti-corruption literacy in each learning activity to all those learners. Furthermore, by building an analysis of social symptoms and public issues with a research approach, it must be able to build public morality. The success of the concept will be able to internalize anti-corruption values and to increase corruption perception index in the world.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.