Many risk factors can potentially influence sperm quality. Telomeres confer stability on the chromosome and their dysfunction has been implicated in conditions such as cancer, aging, and lifestyle. The impact of lifestyle on sperm cell telomeres is unclear. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the impact of lifestyle behaviors on telomere length in sperm and to follow the correlation with pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). In this prospective observational study, sperm was analyzed for telomere length (TL). Men were asked to report lifestyle behaviors including occupation (physical or sedentary), smoking duration and amount, physical activity, dietary habits, and where they keep their cellular phone (bag, pants, or shirt pocket). Correlations among semen analysis, TL, men’s habits, and embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes were evaluated. Among 34 patients recruited, 12 had longer TL and 13 shorter TL. Sperm motility was negatively correlated with TL (Pearson correlation = −.588, p = .002). Smoking adversely affected native sperm motility (53% motility in nonsmokers vs. 37% in smokers; p = .006). However, there was no significant impact on TL. The group with longer telomeres demonstrated significant association with healthy diet (10/12 vs. 6/13; p = .05) and a trend toward more sports activity, weekly (16/84 vs. 7/91; p = .04) compared with the shorter telomeres group. This study suggests that lifestyle, healthy diet, and sports activity are associated with long telomeres in sperm. Sperm quality is also influenced by patients’ habits. The study strongly recommends maintaining a healthy lifestyle to preserve general health and fertility.
The effect of the luteinizing hormone (LH) elevation before the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger in ovulatory frozen-thawed embryo transfer (Ovu-FET) cycles has not been determined. We aimed to investigate whether triggering ovulation in Ovu-FET cycles affects the live birth rate (LBR), and the contribution of elevated LH at the time of hCG trigger. This retrospective study included Ovu-FET cycles performed in our center from August 2016 to April 2021. Modified Ovu-FET (hCG trigger) and true Ovu-FET (without hCG trigger) were compared. The modified group was divided according to whether hCG was administered, before or after LH increased to > 15 IU/L and was twice the baseline value. The modified (n = 100) and true (n = 246) Ovu-FET groups and both subgroups of the modified Ovu-FET, those who were triggered before (n = 67) or after (n = 33) LH elevation, had comparable characteristics at baseline. Comparison of true vs. modified Ovu-FET outcomes revealed similar LBR (35.4% vs. 32.0%; P = 0.62), respectively. LBR were similar between the modified Ovu-FET subgroups regardless of the hCG trigger timing (31.3% before vs. 33.3% after LH elevation; P = 0.84). In conclusion, LBR of Ovu-FET were not affected by hCG trigger or whether LH was elevated at the time of hCG trigger. These results add reassurance regarding hCG triggering even after LH elevation.
This study investigates the incidence of irregular cleavage (IRC) among human embryos and their influence on IVF treatment outcomes. This study was designed as a prospective observational study in a single-centre IVF clinic including 1,001 women who underwent 1,976 assisted reproduction treatments during 2016–2021. Morphokinetics of embryos was analysed and evaluated for the association between IRC and women’s characteristics, treatment characteristics, and pregnancy outcome. We found IRC incidence to be 17.5% (1,689/9,632 embryos). Of these, 85% embryos had one IRC, and 15% had multiple IRC. 35% of IRC events occurred during the embryo's first cell cycle. IRC embryos were found to correlate with male factor (p = 0.01) and higher ICSI rate (p = 0.01). Age, BMI, parity, basal FSH level, stimulation protocol and number of retrieved oocytes did not differ between groups. Embryos with early IRC or more than one IRC event had lower blastulation rate (p = 0.01 and p = 0.01, respectively). Fresh cycles with IRC embryos had a lower clinical pregnancy rate (p = 0.01), and early IRC embryos had a lower live birth rate (p = 0.04) compared to embryos without IRC. Frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles of blastocyst embryos, with and without IRC, had comparable results. In conclusion, number of abnormal cleavage events and their timing are of great importance for the prognosis of the developing human embryo.
This study evaluated β-hCG changes during the early period of pregnancy in an attempt to predict successful pregnancy outcomes in ART. It determined the median values of the β-hCG and the 2-day β-hCG increments of clinical vs. biochemical pregnancies. The results of fresh day 3 embryo, frozen day 3 embryo and frozen day 5 embryo transfers were evaluated. The cutoff values of β-hCG and the 2-day increments predicting clinical pregnancy and delivery were determined. All women who underwent embryo transfer and had a singleton pregnancy from January 2017–December 2019 were included. As expected, clinical pregnancies had higher initial median β-hCG values compared to biochemical pregnancies (fresh day 3 (400 vs. 73 mIU/ml), frozen day 3 (600 vs. 268.5 mIU/ml) and frozen day 5 (937 vs. 317 mIU/ml). Nonetheless, the abortion rate was significantly lower in the group with β-hCG above the cutoff values in fresh (141 mIU/ml), and frozen (354.5 mIU/ml) cleavage stage transfers (17.2% vs. 44%, P<0.001 and 18.5% vs. 38%, P=0.003, respectively). Blastocyst transfers resulted in higher median initial β-hCG compared to cleavage embryo transfers (937 vs. 600 mIU/ml), and the initial β-hCG values from frozen cleavage embryos were higher compared to fresh cleavage embryos (600 vs. 400 mIU/ml). Earlier implantation in frozen cycles may be caused by freezing-thawing procedures. Moreover, in fresh cycles, negative effects of the hormonal milieu of fresh cycles may delay implantation. Results indicate that high initial β-hCG and high 2-day β-hCG increments demonstrated better outcomes, including more clinical pregnancies and fewer abortions.
Study question What is the prevalence of a T-shaped uterus among women undergoing fertility treatments based on ESHRE/ESGE (Grimbizis et al.,2013) and CUME (Ludwin et al.,2020)? Summary answer The prevalence of T-shaped uterus was 4.1% according to the ESHRE/ESGE, and according to the CUME, 1.1% T-shaped uterus and 0.9% borderline T-shaped uterus. What is known already The definition of a T-shaped uterus by the ESHRE/ESGE consensus (Grimbizis et al., 2013) was based on three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) images, defining it as a narrow uterine cavity caused by thickened lateral walls with a ratio of two-thirds uterine body and one-third cervix. This definition is subjective and therefore makes giving an objective diagnosis difficult. The CUME group (Ludwin et al., 2020) described practical diagnostic criteria for a T-shaped uterus according to 3D-US images. As there is no consensus regarding the definition, the overall prevalence according to different studies varied from 0.2 to 10.0%. Study design, size, duration A retrospective cohort study with prospective analysis of 3D-US images was conducted. All women who were admitted to our unit for fertility treatments and underwent 3D-US between 12/2017-12/2021 were included. Women were grouped according to infertility type. All 3D-US images of uteri suspected to be T-shaped according to ESHRE/ESGE were assessed according to the CUME criteria, based on the following three measurements: lateral indentation angle ≤130°, lateral indentation depth ≥7 mm, and T-angle ≤40°. Participants/materials, setting, methods The study was conducted in a single university-affiliated hospital. Women who underwent fertility treatments due to various indications were included. The exclusion criteria were women undergoing fertility preservation, egg donation and oocyte recipients. All 3D-US were performed by well-trained ultrasound technicians. We first screened all images and calculated the prevalence of T-shaped uteri in our population based on the ESHRE/ESGE consensus. Next, we performed the three measurements according to the CUME criteria. Main results and the role of chance Altogether 451 women were admitted to our fertility unit. Nine cases were excluded due to unsatisfactory 3D-US images because of technical difficulties. Finally, 442 women were included in the study and divided into in the following groups: anovulation 10.6% (n = 47), mechanical factor 11.1% (n = 49), male factor 38.7% (n = 171), and unexplained infertility 39.6% (n = 175). The prevalence of T-shaped uterus according to the ESHRE/ESGE was 4.1% (n = 18). Among them, 3.2% (n = 3) were from the female factor groups (anovulation + mechanical), 4.1% (n = 7) from the male factor group, and 4.6% (n = 8) from the unexplained infertility group. Afterwards, the 3D-US images were analyzed according to the CUME criteria. T-shaped uterus was defined when all three criteria were met, and borderline T-shaped uterus was defined when two out of three criteria were met. According to CUME criteria, the prevalence of T-shaped uterus was only 1.1% (n = 5), three being from the male factor group and two from the unexplained infertility group. No T-shaped uteri were found in the female factor groups. Additionally, 0.9% (n = 4) were considered borderline T-shaped. Limitations, reasons for caution The ESHRE/ESGE consensus is subjective and may lead to either under- or over-diagnosis. On the other hand, the CUME criteria are objective and well-defined, but due to their strictness, dysmorphic uteri with very narrow uterine cavities and thickened lateral walls may not be diagnosed as T-shaped uteri. Wider implications of the findings Diagnosis and management of women with T-shaped uteri are very controversial topics. Therefore, making the diagnosis more precise and objective can help us to screen for the most significant cases and tailor the management accordingly. The similar prevalence among different infertility groups reflects the incidental nature of this diagnosis. Trial registration number Not applicable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.