Objective: This study aimed to compare a new vitrification protocol with reduced cryoprotectant exposure to the slow freezing method in the cryopreservation of prepubertal rat testicular tissue.Methods: Five sexually immature male Wistar rats were submitted to bilateral orchiectomy. Tissue samples from each testicle were fragmented into small pieces and randomly assigned to three groups: Group A, fresh tissue (control); Group B, slow programmable freezing (SPF); and Group C (vitrification). Frozen/thawed, vitrified/warmed, and fresh testicular tissue were histologically compared. A pathologist blinded to the procedures assessed the morphology (cell differentiation, nuclei, and epithelium) of 10 seminiferous tubules from each testicle (100 tubules per Group).Results: Sertoli and spermatogonial stem cells were easily differentiated, and the nucleoli were easily viewed in the tubules assessed in all three groups. Small alterations in tissue architecture were observed in the control group as a result of tissue handling. Moderate alterations of the epithelium with the formation of small gaps and cell detachment from the basement membrane were observed in 28% of the frozen and 9% of the vitrified tubules. Condensed nuclei involving a small proportion of cells were observed in six and three tubules of the frozen and vitrified group, respectively. Despite the alterations, 97% of the frozen and 99% of the vitrified tubules were considered well preserved.Conclusions: The findings indicate that the vitrification protocol tested in this study adequately preserved the morphological integrity of prepubertal testicular tissue in a rat model. Further studies are required to confirm testicular tissue function after grafting.
Objeticve: To study the cumulative pregnancy outcome, particularly in terms of live births, with the consecutive transfer of embryos from fresh and vitrified/warmed oocytes to infertile patients in a routine infertility program. Methods: Patients were initially submitted to in vitro fertilization embryo transfer with fresh embryos, while surplus oocytes were vitrified with the Vitri-Ingá method. Patients who did not succeed to carry their gestation to term underwent a new cycle with embryos from their own warmed oocytes. Some of the patients participating in the first warming cycle, who still possessed surplus oocytes, underwent a second warming cycle. Clinical and pregnancy outcomes obtained with fresh and warming cycles were compared using the chi-square test at a level of significance of 5%. Results: Of the 211 participating patients, 97 (46%) got pregnant with fresh embryo transfer, and 69 (32.7%) carried their pregnancies to term. Of the patients participating in the first and second warming cycles, 32/100 (32%) and 6/20 (30.0%) resulted in live births, respectively. Thus, of the 211 participating patients, 107 carried their pregnancies to term, representing a cumulative live birth rate of 50.7%. No statistically significant differences between the use fresh and vitrified oocytes were found for any of the variables studied. Conclusions: Oocyte vitrification offered the possibility of gestation in more than one attempt after just one controlled hyperstimulation. Apart from alleviating the financial burden on patients, vitrification of oocytes may result in a feasible solution for the problems generated by abandoned frozen embryos.
Objective: To study the outcomes of testicular sperm extraction (TESE) among men with pure Sertoli cell-only histology identified during diagnostic testicular biopsy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved 1680 cases of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) diagnosed with pure Sertoli cell-only histology who underwent testicular biopsy with TESE in a reference center in Brazil by a single surgeon. Sperm retrieval rates (SSR) were the main outcome measure. Results: Overall, 14.83% of patients with Sertoli cell-only had sperm retrieved with TESE in quantity that allowed the performance of ICSI. No differences were observed in SSR based on testis volume (<15 mL vs. <15 mL) or serum FSH level. Conclusions: Patients with Sertoli cell-only histology can be counseled that they have some likelihood of sperm retrieval with TESE. Based on the findings, patients to be submitted to testicular biopsy for histologic analysis may be concomitantly prepared for ICSI with TESE in case sperm is available.
Objective: To report on a device designed for the vitrification of germinative tissue, and a systematic vitrification/warming protocol.Methods: We obtained six fragments of cortical germinative tissue from a human ovary. We randomly chose two fragments and sent them to histological analysis. We vitrified four test samples and stored them for one week in liquid nitrogen (LN), and warmed one week later. We sent the vitrified/warmed fragments to the pathology laboratory, where they analyzed them morphologically under an optical microscope (10-40X). They analyzed the nuclear and cytoplasmic characteristics of the follicular cells, luteal layer, and stroma. The primordial and primary follicles in the fresh and vitrified/warmed fragments were counted and compared with the Mann-Whitney test (p<0.05).Results: There were ovarian follicles in different phases of maturation in both fresh and vitrified/warmed fragments, with a predominance of healthy-looking primordial and primary follicles. In the test fragments, the fusocellular architecture supporting the stromal cells exhibited some foci of edema, and were associated with cells with hydropic degeneration, with cytoplasmic fragmentation and eosinophilia. However, there were no signs of tissue necrosis or autolysis. There was no statistically significant difference between the number of follicles found in the control and test tissue fragments (p>0.05).Conclusions: There were no significant morphological changes between fresh and vitrified/warmed germinative tissue. The vitrification device and protocol tested were effective in the preservation of human follicles, and should be considered for the banking germinative tissue for the restoration of fertility of women who are submitted to life-saving sterilizing treatments.
Objective: To analyze gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist in association with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (dual triggering) versus hCG alone (conventional triggering) for final oocyte maturation triggering in GnRH antagonist cycles in an unselected population of Brazilian women. Methods: This prospective case-control study involved 114 patients referred to autologous in vitro fertilization treatment between February 2018 and August 2019, recruited regardless of age, infertility factor or number of cycles. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups according to oocyte maturation triggering approach: group A (n = 48) - hCG only; and group B (n = 66) - hCG plus GnRH agonist. The main outcomes measured were the number of total and metaphase II (MII) oocytes retrieved. Results: The groups were homogenous in terms of age. There were no moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome events. There were no statistical differences concerning total or MII oocytes retrieved between the groups ( p > 0.05). The MII/total oocyte rate was 70.9% in group A, and 74.5% in group B ( p = 0.679). There was no oocyte retrieved in 2/48 patients (4.16%) in group A, 1/66 (1.5%) in group B. There were no MII oocytes in 4/48 patients (8.3%) in group A, and 2/66 (3%) in group B. Age was directly correlated to the number of total and MII oocytes retrieved ( p < 0.05). Conclusions: Dual triggering was equivalent to conventional hCH triggering in terms of the number of total and MII oocytes retrieved in the general population. Further studies are necessary to ascertain dual triggering indication in selected groups of women.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.