BackgroundIn the intraoperative consultation of ovarian tumors, the histological diagnosis of frozen sections (FS) of large tumors is frequently difficult because of the limited number of tumor samples. The application of imprint cytology (IC), in which samples are obtained from wide areas of the tumors, is useful for intraoperative consultation. However, the useful aspects of IC have not been clearly defined. The present study is a detailed comparison of IC and FS that clearly defines the useful aspects of IC.MethodsFifty‐five cases of ovarian tumors that were examined using both IC and FS were evaluated. The histological diagnoses consisted of benign (16), borderline (6), and malignancy (33). All of the malignant tumors consisted of various types of carcinoma.ResultsBenignity and malignancy were accurately diagnosed by both IC and FS. In the borderline group, the diagnostic accuracy of IC was very low (1/6: 16.6%) compared with FS (4/6: 66.6%). The diagnostic accuracy including benign, borderline, and malignant groups was 90.9% (50/55) for IC and 96.3% (53/55) for FS. Concerning the diagnosis of the types of carcinoma, the overall diagnostic accuracy of IC (25/31: 80.6%) was greater than that of FS (21/31: 67.7%), especially for the diagnosis of clear cell carcinoma (IC, 100%; FS, 80%) and mixed carcinoma (IC, 66.6%; FS, 16.6%).ConclusionThe useful aspects of IC in the intraoperative consultation are the diagnosis of benignity or malignancy and the accuracy of diagnosing clear cell carcinoma and mixed carcinoma.
Background: Core needle biopsy (CNB) and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) are useful methods to diagnose cystic lesions of the breast. The first English article describing the returned cell block method (RCBM: cell block from a Papanicolaou staining smear on a glass slide) was reported by us, and we also reported the usefulness of RCBM for the FNAC-based evaluation of tumors of the breast. In the present study, diagnostic procedures of CNB and FNAC using RCBM for cystic lesions of the breast were studied.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.