Differentiation of pluripotent embryonic stem (ES) cells through multipotent neural stem (NS) cells into differentiated neurons is accompanied by wholesale changes in transcriptional programs. One factor that is present at all three stages and a key to neuronal differentiation is the RE1-silencing transcription factor (REST/NRSF). Here, we have used a novel chromatin immunoprecipitation-based cloning strategy (SACHI) to identify 89 REST target genes in ES cells, embryonic hippocampal NS cells and mature hippocampus. The gene products are involved in all aspects of neuronal function, especially neuronal differentiation, axonal growth, vesicular transport and release, and ionic conductance. Most target genes are silent or expressed at low levels in ES and NS cells, but are expressed at much higher levels in hippocampus. These data indicate that the REST regulon is specific to each developmental stage and support the notion that REST plays distinct roles in regulating gene expression in pluripotent ES cells, multipotent NS cells, and mature neurons.

The control of gene expression in neural stem cells is key to understanding their developmental and therapeutic potential, yet we know little of the transcriptional mechanisms that underlie their differentiation. Recent evidence has implicated the RE1 silencing transcription factor (REST) in neuronal differentiation. However, the means by which REST regulates transcription in neural stem cells remain unclear. Here, we show that REST recruits distinct corepressor platforms in neural stem cells. REST is able to both silence and repress neuronal genes in embryonic hippocampal neural stem cells by creating a chromatin environment that contains both repressive local epigenetic signature (characterized by low levels of histones H4 and H3K9 acetylation and elevated dimethylation of H3K9) and H3K4 methylation, which are characteristic of gene activation. Furthermore, inhibition of REST function leads to activation of several neuron-specific genes but does not lead to overt formation of mature neurons, supporting the notion that REST regulates part, but not all, of the neuronal differentiation program.

Establishment of neuronal identity requires co-ordinated expression of specific batteries of genes. These programs of gene expression are executed by activation of neuron-specific genes in neuronal cells and their repression in non-neuronal cells. Such co-ordinate regulation requires that individual activators and repressors regulate transcription from specific subsets of their potential target genes, yet we know little of the mechanisms that underlie this selective process. The RE-1 silencing transcription factor (REST) is a repressor that is proposed to silence transcription of numerous neuron-specific genes in non-neuronal cells via recruitment of two independent histone deacetylase (HDAC)-containing co-repressor complexes. However, in vivo, REST appears to be an obligate silencer for only a minority of RE-1-bearing genes. Here we examine the interaction of REST, Co-REST, Sin3A, HDAC1, and HDAC2 with two archetypical endogenous target genes, the M4 muscarinic receptor and the sodium type II channel (NaV1.2) genes. We find that these genes are present in distinct chromosomal domains. The NaV1.2 gene is actively transcribed but repressed by REST independently of histone deacetylation or DNA methylation and does not co-localize with epigenetic markers of silence, including dimethylation of H3K9 and HP1. In contrast, the M4 gene is maintained in a silent state independently of REST and co-localizes with dimethylated H3K9 and HP1␣ and HP1␥, characteristic of silenced or senescent euchromatic DNA. This contrasts with the coordinate REST-dependent regulation of this locus reported previously. Taken together, we infer that distinct repressor complexes and mechanisms are operative at particular loci even in cell lines derived from a common embryological origin.

Mammalian annexins are implicated in several physiological mechanisms based on their calcium-dependent phospholipid/membrane binding and carbohydrate-binding activities. In this study, we investigated gene expression profiles of all four Caenorhabditis elegans annexins, nex-1, -2, -3 and -4, throughout the development, and compared phospholipid- and carbohydrate-binding properties of their protein products, NEX-1, -2, -3 and -4. We found that nex-1 and -3 are transcribed continuously during the developmental stages, while expression of nex-2 and -4 appeared to be temporal, peaking at the L1 stage followed by a gradual decrease toward the adult stage. NEX-1 and -3 were detected as single protein band in total worm extracts by immunoblotting, but NEX-2 was heterogenic in size. NEX-1, -2, and -3 showed the binding activities to phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylethanolamine, but not to phosphatidylcholine. In contrast to their uniform phospholipids-binding properties, their glycosaminoglycan-binding activities were distinctive. NEX-2 bound to heparan sulfate and chondroitin, NEX-3 bound only to heparan sulfate, and NEX-1 showed no lectin activities under tested conditions. NEX-4 had neither phospholipids- nor carbohydrate-binding properties. Differentiated expression profiles and ligand-binding properties of NEX-1, -2, -3 and -4, shown in our study, may represent distinctive roles for each C. elegans annexins.

Development of the nervous system is accompanied by expansion and differentiation of the neuronal progenitors within the embryonic neuroepithelium. Although the role of growth factors in this process is well documented, there is increasing evidence for a role of neurotransmitters. Acetylcholine is known to exert many actions on developing neural cells, but its potential role in neurogenesis is unclear. Here, we show that the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor is expressed in the neuroepithelium of the rat forebrain, where it is found on both nestin + progenitor cells and TuJ1 + newly differentiated neurons. Furthermore, transcription is governed, at least in part, by regulatory cis elements that are also responsible for driving transcription in neuroblastoma cells. This represents the first demonstration of M1 receptors on neuronal progenitor cells and supports the notion that M1 muscarinic receptors may play a role in development of the nervous system prior to the onset of synaptogenesis and their subsequent role in neurotransmission.

Spectrin is a cytoskeletal protein that plays a role in formation of the specialized plasma membrane domains. However, little is known of the molecular mechanism that regulates responses of spectrin to extracellular stimuli, such as activation of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). We have found that αII spectrin is a component of the Gαq/11-associated protein complex in CHO cells stably expressing the M1 muscarinic receptor, and investigated the effect of activation of GPCR on the cellular localization of yellow-fluorescent-protein-tagged αII spectrin. Stimulation of Gαq/11-coupled M1 muscarinic receptor triggered reversible redistribution of αII spectrin following a rise in intracellular Ca2+ concentration. This redistribution, accompanied by non-apoptotic membrane blebbing, required an intact actin cytoskeleton and was dependent on activation of phospholipase C, protein kinase C, and Rho-associated kinase ROCK. Muscarinic-agonist-induced spectrin remodeling appeared particularly active at localized domains, which is clear contrast to that caused by constitutive activation of ROCK and to global rearrangement of the spectrin lattice caused by changes in osmotic pressure. These results suggest a role for spectrin in providing a dynamic and reversible signaling platform to the specific domains of the plasma membrane in response to stimulation of GPCR.

No abstract

No abstract