Background The H2FPEF score is recognized as a simple method to diagnose heart failure (HF) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF). We investigated the value of the H2FPEF score in predicting subsequent cardiovascular events in HFpEF patients. Methods This study was a retrospective, single-center, observational study. We calculated the H2FPEF scores for 404 consecutive HFpEF patients. Subjects were subdivided into low- (0–3), intermediate- (4–6), and high-score (7–9) groups and followed for 50 months. The primary and secondary endpoints were composite cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, hospitalization for HF decompensation, and nonfatal stroke) occurrence and HF-related events (hospitalization for HF decompensation) occurrence at 50 months, respectively. Results Kaplan–Meier analyses demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events among those with a higher H2FPEF score (log-rank test, P = 0.005). The HF-related event rate was higher in proportion to the H2FPEF score (log-rank test, P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox hazard analyses identified the H2FPEF score (per 1 point) as an independent predictor of cardiovascular and HF-related events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.179; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.066–1.305; P = 0.001 and HR, 1.288; 95% CI, 1.134–1.463; P = 0.001, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the H2FPEF significantly predicted cardiovascular events (area under the curve [AUC], 0.626; 95% CI, 0.557–0.693; P < 0.001) and HF-related events (AUC, 0.680; 95% CI, 0.600–0.759; P < 0.001). The cutoff H2FPEF score was 5.5 for the identification of cardiovascular and HF-related events. Conclusion The H2FPEF score might be a potentially useful marker for the prediction of cardiovascular and HF-related events in HFpEF patients. Clinical Trails Registration Trail Number UMIN000029600.
Total thrombus‐formation analysis system (T‐TAS) quantitatively measures platelet thrombus formation. We examined the utility of T‐TAS in patients with coronary artery disease. T‐TAS can discriminate different types of the antiplatelet therapy in the same measuring method. Genetic background, cytochrome P‐450 2C19 genotypes, also influenced T‐TAS parameters. Summary BackgroundAccurate evaluation of thrombogenicity helps to prevent thrombosis and excessive bleeding. The total thrombus‐formation analysis system (T‐TAS) was developed for quantitative analysis of platelet thrombus formation by the use of microchips with thrombogenic surfaces (collagen, platelet chip [PL‐chip]; collagen plus tissue factor, atherome chip [AR‐chip]). We examined the utility of the T‐TAS in the assessment of the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods and ResultsIn this cross‐sectional study, 372 consecutive patients admitted to the cardiovascular department were divided into three groups: patients not receiving any antiplatelet therapy (control, n = 56), patients receiving aspirin only (n = 69), and patients receiving aspirin and clopidogrel (n = 149). Blood samples were used for the T‐TAS to measure the platelet thrombus‐formation area under the curve (AUC) at various shear rates (1500 s−1 [PL18‐AUC10] and 2000 s−1 [PL24‐AUC10] for the PL‐chip; 300 s−1 [AR10‐AUC30] for the AR‐chip). The on‐clopidogrel platelet aggregation was measured by the use of P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs) with the VerifyNow system. The mean PL24‐AUC10 levels were 358 ± 111 (± standard deviation) (95% confidence interval [CI] 328.9–387.1) in the control group, 256 ± 108 (95% CI 230.5–281.5) in the aspirin group, and 113 ± 91 (95% CI 98.4–127.6) in the aspirin/clopidogrel group. In the aspirin/clopidogrel group, the PL24‐AUC10 was higher in poor metabolizers (PMs) with cytochrome P450 2C19(CYP2C19) polymorphisms (152 ± 112, 95% CI 103.4–200.6) than in the non‐PM group (87 ± 74, 95% CI 73.8–100.2). ConclusionsOur findings suggest that the PL24‐AUC10 level measured by the T‐TAS is a potentially suitable index for the assessment of antiplatelet therapy in CAD patients.
BackgroundNon–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are used to prevent thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. The T‐TAS “Total Thrombus‐formation Analysis System” (Fujimori Kogyo Co Ltd) was developed for quantitative analysis of thrombus formation using microchips with thrombogenic surfaces (collagen, platelet chip [PL] ; collagen plus tissue factor, atheroma chip [AR]). We evaluated the utility of T‐TAS in predicting periprocedural bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA).Methods and ResultsAfter exclusion of 20 from 148 consecutive patients undergoing CA, the remaining 128 patients were divided into 2 treatment groups: the warfarin group (n=30) and the non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group (n=98). Blood samples obtained on the day of CA (anticoagulant‐free point) and at 3 and 30 days after CA were used in T‐TAS to compute the thrombus formation area under the curve (AUC; AUC for the first 10 minutes for PL tested at flow rate of 24 μL/min [PL 24‐AUC 10]; AUC for the first 30 minutes for AR tested at flow rate of 10 μL/min [AR 10‐AUC 30]). AR 10‐AUC 30 and PL 24‐AUC 10 levels were similar in the 2 groups on the day of CA. Levels of AR 10‐AUC 30, but not PL 24‐AUC 10, were significantly lower in the 2 groups at days 3 and 30 after CA. Multiple logistic regression analyses identified the AR 10‐AUC 30 level on the day of CA as a significant predictor of periprocedural bleeding events (odds ratio 5.7; 95% CI 1.54–21.1; P=0.009). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the AR 10‐AUC 30 level on the day of CA significantly predicted periprocedural bleeding events (AUC 0.859, 95% CI 0.766–0.951; P<0.001). The cutoff AR 10‐AUC 30 level was 1648 for identification of periprocedural bleeding events.ConclusionsThese results suggested that the AR 10‐AUC 30 level determined by T‐TAS is a potentially useful marker for prediction of bleeding events in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing CA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.