The aim of the present study was to establish Japanese reference material on the third molar development of Japanese juveniles for forensic application. Observations were performed on the orthopantomograms of 1282 Japanese patients between the ages of 14.0 and 24.0 years. Demirjian formation stages of the maxillary and mandibular third molars were recorded for chronological evaluation of wisdom teeth and applied for further statistical analysis. Statistically significant differences were noted between the upper and lower jaws and genders. Accordingly, males achieved root developmental grades earlier than females. We assessed the mean ages for all formation grades and predicted the probability that a Japanese juvenile would be older than the relevant ages of 14, 16, and 20 as defined by Japanese Juvenile Law. We determined the likelihood that a Japanese youth is older than the relevant age of 18 as defined by legislation in the United States.

The results indicate that the Dental 3D-CT imaging system is suitable for clinical assessment of alveolar bone grafting before and after installation of dental implants or orthodontic treatment of the cleft-adjacent teeth.

No abstract

No abstract

For one year we studied postoperative computed tomograms (CT) and intraoral radiographs for 29 patients with unilateral alveolar clefts. Interdental bone height and the bony boundary on the nasal side were assessed on intraoral films and compared with the evaluation by CT. Twenty-four cases had adequate interdental bone height as assessed by intraoral films. However, 10 of these 24 cases showed insufficient anteroposterior depth on CT. Two of the remaining five cases were also overestimated by the intraoral radiograph. All cases had sufficient bony boundary on the nasal side on intraoral radiography. However, CT showed that bone formation on the nasal side off two cases was significantly worse than that on the non-cleft side. Consequently, about 40% of surgical outcomes may be overestimated by intraoral radiographs. CT therefore seems to give a better assessment of the clinical outcome than intraoral radiographs and should be considered as an adjunct in difficult clinical cases.