Background This study aimed to highlight cultural barriers faced by surgeons pursuing a surgical career faced by surgeons at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. As more females opt for a surgical career, barriers faced by female surgeons are becoming increasingly evident, many of which are rooted in cultural norms. In Pakistan, a predominantly Muslim‐majority, low middle‐income country, certain societal expectations add additionally complexity and challenges to existing cultural barriers. Methods A cross‐sectional survey was administered via e‐mail to the full‐time faculty and trainees in the Department of Surgery at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from July 2019 to November 2019. Results In total, 100 participants were included in this study, with the majority being residents (55.6%) and consultants (33.3%). 71.9% of female surgeons felt that cultural barriers towards a surgical career existed for their gender, as compared to 25.4% of male surgeons (p < 0.001). 40.6% of females reported having been discouraged by family/close friends from pursuing surgery, as compared to only 9.0% of males (p < 0.001). Moreover, a greater percentage of females surgeons were responsible for household cooking, cleaning and laundry, as compared to male surgeons (all p < 0.001). Lastly, 71.4% of female surgeons felt that having children had hindered their surgical career, as compared to 4.8% of males (p < 0001). Conclusion Our study shows that significant cultural barriers exist for females pursuing a surgical career in our setting. Findings such as these emphasize the need for policy makers to work towards overcoming cultural barriers.
Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use: https://youtu.be/NggAFXxX9vwPurpose: The single most significant barrier to healthcare for people who identify as transgender is poor access to healthcare providers trained in trans-health. Despite this, transhealth education is far from being a routine component of the undergraduate medical curriculum in developing countries like Pakistan. This study aimed to assess knowledge and attitudes regarding people who identify as transgender, as well as the perceived need for trans-health in the curriculum, amongst medical students in Pakistan.Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study using a self-designed questionnaire was carried out amongst undergraduate medical students at the Aga Khan University. Stratified random sampling was used, whereby students were stratified based on their current year of medical education.Results: A total of 249 students were included in this survey. The majority (61%) had poor overall knowledge, with a significantly higher percentage of pre-clinical students (79.6%) having poor knowledge regarding differences in transgender health needs compared to clinical students (60.3%; p = 0.001). Most students acknowledged that individuals who identified as transgender faced a lack of access to healthcare (78.3%), were poorly integrated into society (92.0%) and were treated differently in a clinical setting (58.6%). Many students were unsure of how to address (49.8%) and clinically examine (38.2%) patients identifying as transgender. However, most students demonstrated good (49.4%) or fair (45.0%) attitudes towards individuals who identified as transgender, and the majority reported a high (54.6%) or moderate (42.2%) perceived need for the inclusion of trans-health in the medical curriculum. Conclusion:Despite deficiencies in trans-health education in the medical school curriculum, positive attitudes and a high perceived need among students lay the foundation for developing a medical curriculum that gives due priority to trans-health. In developing countries, this can help bridge disparities in healthcare provision to people who identify as transgender.
Background Sociocultural norms and gender biases may result in surgeon gender preferences among the general public. This study aimed to understand preferences and perceptions related to surgeon gender among the general population in Pakistan, a lower-middle-income country. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted by the Aga Khan University, Karachi, among the adult general population in Pakistan. Sequential mixed-mode data collection was performed via online dissemination on social media platforms and in-person surveying at different geographic locations in Karachi. Results Among 1604 respondents, 50% did not report having surgeon gender preferences in general. Among respondents with gender preferences, there was a highly significant preference for gender concordance across all surgical subspecialties (p \0.001) except cardiothoracic surgery and neurosurgery. Exceptions where women preferred a male surgeon were neurosurgery (59.7% vs. 40.3%; p \0.001) and cardiothoracic surgery (53.1% vs. 46.9%; p \0.001). Moreover, respondents felt more comfortable communicating with (67.6%) and being examined by (73.3%) gender concordant surgeons. Men more commonly perceived male surgeons as more competent (26% vs. 14.5%; p \0.001) and warmer (18.3% vs. 9.8%; p \0.001) than female surgeons. Nevertheless, the most important factors influencing selection of a surgeon were the surgeon's reputation (69.6%) and experience (50.5%). Most respondents (84.5%) believed that more females should practice surgery. Conclusion While around half of respondents do not have gender preferences, a significant proportion prefers a gender concordant surgeon across subspecialties. In a society where conservative sociocultural norms play a significant role when seeking health care, this makes yet another compelling argument for gender parity in surgery.
Background Our group investigates objective performance indicators (OPIs) to analyze robotic colorectal surgery. Analyses of OPI data are difficult in dual-console procedures (DCPs) as there is currently no reliable, efficient, or scalable technique to assign console-specific OPIs during a DCP. We developed and validated a novel metric to assign tasks to appropriate surgeons during DCPs. Methods A colorectal surgeon and fellow reviewed 21 unedited, dual-console proctectomy videos with no information to identify the operating surgeons. The reviewers watched a small number of random tasks and assigned “attending” or “trainee” to each task. Based on this sampling, the remainder of task assignments for each procedure was extrapolated. In parallel, we applied our newly developed OPI, ratio of economy of motion (rEOM), to assign consoles. Results from the 2 methods were compared. Results A total of 1811 individual surgical tasks were recorded during 21 proctectomy videos. A median of 6.5 random tasks (137 total) were reviewed during each video, and the remainder of task assignments were extrapolated based on the 7.6% of tasks audited. The task assignment agreement was 91.2% for video review vs rEOM, with rEOM providing ground truth. It took 2.5 hours to manually review video and assign tasks. Ratio of economy of motion task assignment was immediately available based on OPI recordings and automated calculation. Discussion We developed and validated rEOM as an accurate, efficient, and scalable OPI to assign individual surgical tasks to appropriate surgeons during DCPs. This new resource will be useful to everyone involved in OPI research across all surgical specialties.
INTRODUCTION Gliomas are the most common malignant brain tumors of the central nervous system in adults. Specialized treatment modalities have improved morbidity and mortality within high-income countries. In lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the overall mortality rate is still seen to be alarmingly high. As there is a shortage of statistical data available regarding the epidemiology of these tumors and their management within the country, the objective of this study is to define the landscape of treatment patterns and current epidemiological data regarding gliomas in Pakistan. METHODS As part of the Pakistan Brain Tumor Epidemiology Study (PBTES), data was collected from major neurosurgical centers across the country, consisting of 35 hospitals in all 4 provinces. Our retrospective study looked at patients who underwent surgical procedures for gliomas in 2019, where a surgical pathology was available. The data was collated and analyzed using appropriate statistical methods. RESULTS 791 patients with gliomas were identified (61.8 % in public sector hospitals, 39.1% in private sector). The most common histopathological subtypes were glioblastoma (33.5%), followed by astrocytoma (18.8%) and oligodendroglioma (11.9%). Gender distribution was skewed towards men (65%). The most commonly performed initial surgical procedure was gross total resection (50% in public hospitals, 41% in private hospitals). Private institution hospitals performed surgical biopsies as the first surgical procedure (23%) more often than public hospitals (9%). Regarding adjuvant treatments, only 26% of patients were given chemotherapy, and there was no data regarding 53% of patients. Similarly, only 15% of patients received radiation therapy, and there was no data for 60% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Our study was able to identify the gaps in glioma management within Pakistan, particularly with regards to chemoradiotherapy. Identifying these unmet needs is the first step in developing comprehensive care for glioma patients.
INTRODUCTION Global oncology development within LMICs (low- and middle-income countries) requires bridging gaps in healthcare systems. Brain tumor care in Pakistan is currently sparse and concentrated in urban centers. Distance traveled to a hospital dictates a patient’s access to care, neurosurgical access, and continuity of care through adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and primary care providers can be disrupted if patients cannot overcome the barriers due to extensive distances traveled. METHODS Data was collected as part of the Pakistan Brain Tumor Epidemiology Study (PBTES) regarding patients with brain tumors who underwent surgical procedures in 2019 at private and public major neurosurgical centers across Pakistan. Using patient addresses, we used a mapping software to calculate the distance traveled by each patient to the primary hospital. Analysis was done using appropriate statistical methods. RESULTS Out of 2403 patients, the mean distance traveled across the country was 240 km. The longest distance traveled within Pakistan was from Skardu to Karachi (2002 km) for resection of a pituitary adenoma (28 hours via car). Only 48% of patients were able to reach their primary hospital within 50 km. 52% of patients had to travel more than 50 km, and 18% had to travel upwards of 500 km to reach their primary hospital. Additionally, 101 patients traveled to Pakistan from other countries for brain tumor surgery (98 patients from Afghanistan [mean distance traveled: 723.6 km], 3 patients from Syria, Oman, and Sudan). CONCLUSION Prior studies have described a cut-off of 50 km as an acceptable limit for distance from the primary hospital in cancer patients for optimal follow-up and outcomes, which is achieved by only 48% of brain tumor patients in Pakistan. Most patients have poor access to surgical care for brain tumors, further compounded by repeat traveling for follow-ups and chemoradiotherapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.