No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The Discover artificial cervical disc replacement offers favorable outcome compared with ACDF for a single-level cervical disk disease at short-term and long-term follow-up.

The authors retrospectively analysed two groups of consecutive patients who were similarly matched for brain injury severity. From a total of 39 severe head injury patients, 23 were treated according to the Guidelines for the Management of Severe Head Injury with intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring ("Guidelines group"). Such an approach allowed the maintenance of ICP within normal values, especially in patients with intraventricular ICP monitoring allowing the release of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from the ventricular system. In the Guidelines group only two patients were administered barbiturates, after all other means of ICP lowering had been exhausted. The second group consisted of 16 patients who were not monitored for ICP ("non-Guidelines group"). In this group, management consisted of the prophylactic administration of barbiturates, high dose osmotic diuretics and hyperventilation usually at levels below 25 mm Hg. In the Guidelines group the mortality rate was 30% compared to 44% in the non-Guidelines group. Almost twice as many patients achieved a "favourable" (good recovery and moderate disability) outcome (49%) compared to the non-Guidelines treated patients (25%). Furthermore, there was a 32% decrease in severe neurological disabilities in those patients in the Guidelines group. It seems that the implementation of "Guidelines" in the treatment of severe head injury, based on the result of our clinical study, reduces death and disability rates in patients with severe head injury. The administration of therapy based on the "Guidelines principles" and monitoring of ICP, can minimise the application of those therapeutic modalities (barbiturate coma and prolonged hyperventilation) which, in addition to favourable effects, may also have harmful effects on patients with severe head injury.

BACKGROUND:The flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been described as a unidirectional system with the choroid plexus serving as the primary secretor of CSF and the arachnoid granulations as primary reabsorption site. This theory of neurosurgical forefathers has been universally adopted and taught as dogma. Many neuroscientists have found difficulty reconciling this theory with common pathologies, and recent studies have found that this “classic” hypothesis may not represent the full picture.OBJECTIVE:To review modern CSF dynamic theories and to call for medical education reform.METHODS:We reviewed the literature from January 1990 to December 2020. We searched the PubMed database using key terms “cerebrospinal fluid circulation,” “cerebrospinal fluid dynamics,” “cerebrospinal fluid physiology,” “glymphatic system,” and “glymphatic pathway.” We selected articles with a primary aim to discuss either CSF dynamics and/or the glymphatic system.RESULTS:The Bulat–Klarica–Orešković hypothesis purports that CSF is secreted and reabsorbed throughout the craniospinal axis. CSF demonstrates similar physiology to that of water elsewhere in the body. CSF “circulates” throughout the subarachnoid space in a pulsatile to-and-fro fashion. Osmolarity plays a critical role in CSF dynamics. Aquaporin-4 and the glymphatic system contribute to CSF volume and flow by establishing osmolarity gradients and facilitating CSF movement. Multiple studies demonstrate that the choroid plexus does not play any significant role in CSF circulation.CONCLUSION:We have highlighted major studies to illustrate modern principles of CSF dynamics. Despite these, the medical education system has been slow to reform curricula and update learning resources.

Aim:Spinal ependymomas are among the most common intramedullary neoplasms in both adults and children. While surgical resection is the golden treatment standard, the role chemotherapy and radiotherapy have in patients with spinal ependymomas remains unclear. The aim of this study is to determine the predictors of functional outcome following spinal ependymoma resection to single out patients that may require adjuvant therapy.Methods:We conducted a retrospective study on patients that underwent spinal ependymoma resection in our institution in a 10-year period. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine was used to set the diagnosis of an intradural/intramedullary neoplasm. All patients underwent either gross tumor resection or tumor mass reduction. Histological diagnosis and histopathological grading of spinal ependymoma were done for all collected samples. Patients’ general and neurological examination were performed early after the surgery (within the 1st week) and in a 6-month follow-up.Results:A total of 51 intradural and intramedullary ependymoma resection surgeries on 43 patients were performed. There were slightly more male patients (57%) and the average patient age was 41 years. About 76.5% of patients presented with a tumor affecting one vertebrae level, while 23.5% presented with tumors expanding over two or more spinal regions. Gross tumor resection was achieved in 80% of cases, while 25% of procedures were performed on a recurring ependymomas. Most of the tumors (57%) were classified as G2 histological grade, while 8% were anaplastic ependymomas. In 80% of cases, early postoperative patient status was either better or equivalent to the preoperative one, while in a 6-month follow-up, up to 60% of cases showed a significant improvement over the preoperative status. Different demographic and clinical parameters were not proven to be predictors of postsurgical patient outcome including age, gender, and initial neurological presentation. Interestingly, most tumor characteristics were also not associated with postoperative functional outcome (histological grade, number of vertebrae levels affected, whether it is a primary or recurrent tumor). Even the scope of surgical procedure did not affect the functional outcome. The spinal region affected by the tumor was proven to be a predictor of early postoperative outcome (ρ= 0.346, P = 0.033), with lumbar spine being associated with the best outcomes. As expected, the scope of the surgery and whether gross tumor resection or tumor mass reduction was performed were the only significant predictors of tumor recurrence (ρ= 0.391, P = 0.005).Conclusions:Spinal ependymoma resection is an efficient procedure that improves the patient outcomes. Spinal region affected by the tumor is likely to be the most important predictor of functional outcome, while the procedure scope seems to be the most important predictor of tumor recurrence.