With both catalytic and genetic functions, ribonucleic acid (RNA) is perhaps the most pluripotent chemical species in molecular biology, and its functions are intimately linked to its structure and dynamics. Computer simulations, and in particular atomistic molecular dynamics (MD), allow structural dynamics of biomolecular systems to be investigated with unprecedented temporal and spatial resolution. We here provide a comprehensive overview of the fast-developing field of MD simulations of RNA molecules. We begin with an in-depth, evaluatory coverage of the most fundamental methodological challenges that set the basis for the future development of the field, in particular, the current developments and inherent physical limitations of the atomistic force fields and the recent advances in a broad spectrum of enhanced sampling methods. We also survey the closely related field of coarse-grained modeling of RNA systems. After dealing with the methodological aspects, we provide an exhaustive overview of the available RNA simulation literature, ranging from studies of the smallest RNA oligonucleotides to investigations of the entire ribosome. Our review encompasses tetranucleotides, tetraloops, a number of small RNA motifs, A-helix RNA, kissing-loop complexes, the TAR RNA element, the decoding center and other important regions of the ribosome, as well as assorted others systems. Extended sections are devoted to RNA–ion interactions, ribozymes, riboswitches, and protein/RNA complexes. Our overview is written for as broad of an audience as possible, aiming to provide a much-needed interdisciplinary bridge between computation and experiment, together with a perspective on the future of the field.

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations became a leading tool for investigation of structural dynamics of nucleic acids. Despite recent efforts to improve the empirical potentials (force fields, ffs), RNA ffs have persisting deficiencies, which hamper their utilization in quantitatively accurate simulations. Previous studies have shown that at least two salient problems contribute to difficulties in the description of free-energy landscapes of small RNA motifs: (i) excessive stabilization of the unfolded single-stranded RNA ensemble by intramolecular base–phosphate and sugar–phosphate interactions and (ii) destabilization of the native folded state by underestimation of stability of base pairing. Here, we introduce a general ff term (gHBfix) that can selectively fine-tune nonbonding interaction terms in RNA ffs, in particular, the H bonds. The gHBfix potential affects the pairwise interactions between all possible pairs of the specific atom types, while all other interactions remain intact; i.e., it is not a structure-based model. In order to probe the ability of the gHBfix potential to refine the ff nonbonded terms, we performed an extensive set of folding simulations of RNA tetranucleotides and tetraloops. On the basis of these data, we propose particular gHBfix parameters to modify the AMBER RNA ff. The suggested parametrization significantly improves the agreement between experimental data and the simulation conformational ensembles, although our current ff version still remains far from being flawless. While attempts to tune the RNA ffs by conventional reparametrizations of dihedral potentials or nonbonded terms can lead to major undesired side effects, as we demonstrate for some recently published ffs, gHBfix has a clear promising potential to improve the ff performance while avoiding introduction of major new imbalances.

Refinement of empirical force fields for nucleic acids requires their extensive testing using as wide range of systems as possible. However, finding unambiguous reference data is not easy. In this paper, we analyze four systems which we suggest should be included in standard portfolio of molecules to test nucleic acids force fields, namely, parallel and antiparallel stranded DNA guanine quadruplex stems, RNA quadruplex stem, and Z-DNA. We highlight parameters that should be monitored to assess the force field performance. The work is primarily based on 8.4 μs of 100–250 ns trajectories analyzed in detail followed by 9.6 μs of additional selected back up trajectories that were monitored to verify that the results of the initial analyses are correct. Four versions of the Cornell et al. AMBER force field are tested, including an entirely new parmχOL4 variant with χ dihedral specifically reparametrized for DNA molecules containing syn nucleotides. We test also different water models and ion conditions. While improvement for DNA quadruplexes is visible, the force fields still do not fully represent the intricate Z-DNA backbone conformation.